Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Equatorial Angle Distribution between the Electrons captured in the Outer Van Allen Radiation Belt

Abstract

FROM the measurements registered by Explorer VI in the outer Van Allen radiation belt, C. Y. Fan, P. Mayer and J. A. Simpson1 succeeded in determining the number of particles which, in their longitudinal motion between two magnetic mirrors, cross the equator with a given pitch angle. In the polar diagram (number of particles versus equatorial pitch angle, χe) obtained by those authors a maximum exists for the equatorial pitch χe = 35°. This maximum has a sort of dynamical stability, because it is restored after a magnetic storm. In fact the authors observed a perturbation of the magnetic field, which shifted the maximum from 35° to 48°, but the value χe = 35° was resumed in spite of the fact that the number of electrons with a given velocity v was changed by a factor about 3.8.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fan, C. Y., Mayer, P., and Simpson, J. A., Space Research, 2 (Amsterdam, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alfvén, H., Cosmical Electrodynamics (Oxford). Calamai, G., Il Nuovo Cimento, X, 26, 1090 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CALAMAI, G. Equatorial Angle Distribution between the Electrons captured in the Outer Van Allen Radiation Belt. Nature 207, 1179–1180 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1038/2071179a0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2071179a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing