Why can't people be more like bats?

Article metrics

Cheating Monkeys and Citizen Bees: The Nature of Cooperation in Animals and Humans

Free Press: 1999. 174pp. $25, £1699

What have hermaphroditic sea bass, Mother Teresa and naked mole rats in common? This is not the latest dirty joke, but rather a serious issue treated in Lee Dugatkin's latest book Cheating Monkeys and Citizen Bees. These are three of the many organisms cited as displaying examples of cooperative behaviour, without which any society would, sooner or later, crumble. In order to avoid this fatal outcome, Dugatkin suggests, we should study the evolution of animal cooperation, because such a study “can be used to help us better understand and promote human cooperation”. As animals present behaviours that are free of the influence of human culture, they can give us clues about cooperative strategies where moral will is absent, and where the only judge is natural selection.

Like four pillars of wisdom, Dugatkin describes four different strategies of cooperation: family dynamics, in which one is more likely to help relatives than strangers; reciprocal transactions, in which individuals cooperate with those they trust; selfish teamwork, in which cooperation can often be seen as a mere by-product of a selfish behaviour; and group altruism, in which individual altruistic behaviour (even though sacrificial) may be maintained when the unit of selection is the group where it belongs. This segmentation does not mean that animal cooperative behaviours are always so simple that they must necessarily belong to one of these categories, but these “four paths to cooperation” are based on sufficiently different evolutionary mechanisms to justify their distinction.

Each chapter is richly illustrated by well-chosen and often illuminating examples of cooperative behaviours, such as the baby-sitting behaviour of dwarf mongooses, the regurgitation of blood meals in vampire bats for their starving roostmates, the formation of coalition to rapt females in baboons, the exploratory tour of guppy fishes in front of predators, the helping behaviour of bee-eater birds towards their baby brothers and sisters, and the better-known social behaviours of ants, termite or bees. In all these cases, the author presents a very credible evolutionary explanation for the emergence and preservation of those behaviours by natural selection. Then, in an altruistic manner, he turns to the question of using this newly acquired knowledge to foster cooperation in humans.

This is where the book goes off course. The potential applications of animal models of cooperation to humans are often appallingly simplistic, and mainly consist of a collection of recipes to improve the efficiency of teamwork. Police officers, soldiers, fire-fighters and work colleagues are the main groups he thinks could improve their cooperative behaviour. He suggests various measures to achieve this aim. Army or police units should be structured around relatedness, for example, since kin are more willing to help each other in dangerous situations. Small teams of related individuals would work harder because of kin-related benefits. Pairs of police officers should be teamed for long periods to increase their chances of interacting and helping each other. Reducing the size of teams could remove any temptation to cheat by working less.

As this book is targeted for a lay audience these ideas may well attract attention from people delighted (or afraid) to find some biological justification for nepotism or the creation of harsher working environments.

The book is a mixture of well-presented behavioural ecology and cheap sociology. Though Dugatkin is a recognized behavioural ecologist, he is far from being an outstanding philosopher. The human applications mentioned above almost all deal with people exposed to some sort of pressure (war, thieves, fire or work), where some penalty is imposed on cheats (death or a pay cut). The author's mistake is to transpose natural selection, a powerful explanatory paradigm in animals, into a mere coercive force in humans, implying that cooperation can be increased by additional constraints. Will the spirit of 1984 rule the twenty-first century? Probably, if we try to foster cooperation rather than harmony.

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.