Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.


When one eye is better than two

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Keeping an eye on things — independent eye movements in the chameleon and sandlance.
Figure 2: How the sandlance and the chameleon could gauge depth by rotating a single eye.


  1. Pettigrew, J. D., Collin, S. P. & Ott, M. Curr. Biol. 9, 421–424 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fritsches, K. A. & Marshall, N. J. Curr. Biol. 9, R272-R273 (1999).

  3. Land, M. F. Curr. Biol. 9, R286-R288 (1999).

  4. Pettigrew, J. D. & Collin, S. P. J. Comp. Physiol. A 177, 397–408 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harkness, L. Nature 267, 346–349 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Land, M. F. Nature 373, 658–659 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wallace, G. K. J. Exp. Biol. 36, 512–525 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kral, K. Behav. Processes 43, 71–77 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Walls, G. L. Vision Res. 2, 69–80 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srinivasan, M. When one eye is better than two. Nature 399, 305–307 (1999).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing