Abstract
A RECENT communication from this laboratory1 appears in some ways to have been misunderstood. We did not claim that the machine described was more sensitive than that of other workers, but described a system which we felt was of practical value for the examination of aqueous biological tissues and which, as stated in the communication, was a modified version of one used by Commoner and Townsend.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cook, P. D., and Mallard, J. R., Nature, 198, 145 (1963).
Stoodley, L. G., Nature, 198, 1077 (1963).
Stoodley, L. G., J. Electron. Contr., 14, 531 (1963).
Wilmshurst, T. H., Nature, 199, 477 (1963).
Hollocher, T. C., and Commoner, B., Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci., 47, 1355 (1961).
Assenheim, H. W. (private communication).
Pake, G. E., Free Radicals in Biological Systems, 91 (Academic Press, London, 1961).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
KENT, M., MALLARD, J. Use of Long Cavities for Aqueous Biological Tissue Samples in an Electron Spin Resonance Spectrometer. Nature 204, 396–397 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/204396a0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/204396a0
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.