Abstract
CONRAD 1–3 has shown that sequences of items which are difficult to discriminate when heard in noise are also hard to remember, even though presented visually. This result can be interpreted either: (a) as showing that there is a very strong acoustic factor in immediate memory, or (b) as an example of one of many types of similarity which impair recall. Since long-term sequence learning is hindered by various types of similarity4,5 if this latter interpretation is correct, it would support the view that long and short-term memory are basically very similar6.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Conrad, R., Nature, 193, 1314 (1962).
Conrad, R., Nature, 197, 4871 (1963).
Conrad, R., Brit. J. Psychol., 55, 75 (1964).
Underwood, B. J., and Goad, D., J. Exp. Psychol., 42, 125 (1951).
Horowitz, L. M., J. Exp. Psychol., 62, 51 (1961).
Melton, A. W., J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav., 2, 1 (1963).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BADDELEY, A. Semantic and Acoustic Similarity in Short-term Memory. Nature 204, 1116–1117 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/2041116a0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2041116a0
This article is cited by
-
Memory recovery after traumatic coma
Acta Neurochirurgica (1976)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.