Abstract
THE deviation of the lunar figure from hydrostatic form may impose theoretical limitations on the thermal state of the interior. This deviation is indicated, not by the geometrical form, but by the ellipsoid of inertia, and the triaxiality of this ellipsoid is several times greater than can be explained by the rotation plus the tidal influence of the Earth. According to Jeffreys1: (C−A)/C = 0.0006269 ± 27, (B−A)/C = 0.000118 ± 57 Although the equatorial ellipticity is far smaller than the general flattening, which is the main feature, some authors continue to suppose that the Moon possesses solidified tidal bulges associated with a former closer distance to the Earth. But then (C−A)/(B–A) would necessarily be 4/3. In view of the fact that (B−A)/C can be determined with only poor precision, it was long supposed that further observations would lead to better agreement with the hypothesis of a solidified tide, but the latest degree of precision now excludes this hope.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Jeffreys, H., The Earth as a Planet, edit. by Kuiper, G. P., Chap. 2 (Univ. Chicago Press, 1954).
Levin, B. J., Problems of Cosmogony, 6, 56 (1958) (in Russian).
Urey, H. C., The Planets, their Origin and Development (Yale Univ. Press, 1952).
MacDonald, G. J. F., J. Geophys. Res., 64, 1967 (1959); 67, 2945 (1962).
Levin, B., and Majeva, S., Doklady Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 133, 44 (1960). Levin, B., Proc. Intern. Symp. The Moon, 157 (1962).
Urey, H. C., Elsasser, W. M., and Rochester, M. G., Astrophys. J., 129, 842 (1959).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LEVIN, B. A New Hypothesis for the Non-equilibrium Figure of the Moon. Nature 202, 1201–1202 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/2021201a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2021201a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.