ALL theories of behaviour have to make predictions about observable responses. Despite the arguments of Kendler1, this should, not be allowed to conceal the fact that different behaviour theories differ radically as to the rules by which they determine membership of a response class. If we are to go on using the term ‘response’ for the units of behaviour among which we seek orderly relationships, it is important that we should be clear what we mean by it.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Kendler, H. H., Psych. Rev., 59, 269 (1952).
Macfarlane, D. A., Univ. California Pub. Psych., 4, No. 18 (1930).
Lashley, K. S., and McCarthy, D. A., J. Comp. Psych., 6, 423 (1926).
Lashley, K. S., and Ball, J., J. Comp. Psych., 9, 71 (1929).
Deutsch, J. A., The Structural Basis of Behaviour, (Cambridge, 1960).
Deutsch, J. A., Quart. J. Exp. Psych., 11, 155 (1959).
Deutsch, J. A., and Clarkson, J. K., Quart. J. Exp. Psych., 11, 150 (1959).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SHELDON, M. Response Learning. Nature 202, 1141–1142 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/2021141b0
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.