Abstract
IN hierarchical classifications each sub-group may be formed from the splitting into two parts of a larger group, or alternatively from the union of two smaller groups. Both these procedures are repetitive, and in either case ‘false’ decisions (arising from the statistical variability of the data) made in the early stages of the analysis will distort its subsequent course. For this reason, divisive methods, which start with the whole sample, are in general safer than agglomerative methods. In the past, one attraction of agglomerative methods has been their flexibility; any two sub-groups could be considered for possible combination. With divisive methods, in all but the simplest cases some restriction is necessary on the possible subdivisions considered, since there are 2n−1 − 1 ways of dividing n individuals into two groups. One procedure1 is to consider only monothetic subdivisions, that is, those definable in terms of the possession or lack of a single attribute by the individuals concerned.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Williams, W. T., and Lance, G. N., Nature, 182, 1755 (1958).
Cochran, G., and Hopkins, C. E., Biometrics, 17, 10 (1961).
Rescigno, A., and Maccaccaro, G. A., in Symposium on Information Theory (Butterworth, London, 1960).
Edwards, A. W. F., Fifth Intern. Biometric Conf., Cambridge (1963).
Williams, W. T., Dale, M. B., and Macnaughton-Smith, P., Nature, 201, 426 (1964).
Williams, W. T., and Lambert, J. M., J. Ecol., 48, 689 (1960).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MACNAUGHTON-SMITH, P., WILLIAMS, W., DALE, M. et al. Dissimilarity Analysis: a new Technique of Hierarchical Sub-division. Nature 202, 1034–1035 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/2021034a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2021034a0
This article is cited by
-
Comprehensive survey on hierarchical clustering algorithms and the recent developments
Artificial Intelligence Review (2023)
-
A Comparative Study of Divisive and Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering Algorithms
Journal of Classification (2018)
-
Divisive hierarchical maximum likelihood clustering
BMC Bioinformatics (2017)
-
Identification of customer groups in the German term life market: a benefit segmentation
Annals of Operations Research (2017)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.