Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Discrimination Learning : Non-additivity of Cues

Abstract

ANIMALS solve a discrimination problem more rapidly when two cues are present and relevant than when either cue is present on its own. Thus Eninger1 found that rats learned to take the correct turn in a maze faster when the correct turn was signalled by both a visual and an auditory cue than when it was signalled by one without the other. Warren2 found that monkeys learned to discriminate faster between objects differing in size and form than between objects differing in size or form alone. This phenomenon has been named ‘additivity of cues’ and has usually been interpreted to mean that individual animals solve problems containing two cues by learning to attach the correct responses to both: if animals learn to make the response as fast to each cue when they are presented together as they do to a single cue presented on its own, their discrimination performance will improve more rapidly when both cues are present than when one alone is present3.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eninger, M. U., J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 45, 511 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Warren, J. M., J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 46, 484 (1953).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Restle, F., Psychol. Rev., 62, 11 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Described in Mackintosh, N. J., Brit. J. Psychol., 54, 127 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sutherland, N. S., in Proc. Symp. Mechanization of Thought Processes, 2, 575 (H.M.S.O., 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mackintosh, N. J., J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 55, 555 (1962); Brit. J. Psychol., 54, 127 (1963); J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 56, 842 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SUTHERLAND, N., MACKINTOSH, J. Discrimination Learning : Non-additivity of Cues. Nature 201, 528–530 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/201528b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/201528b0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing