Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A High Relative Biological Efficiency of 650-keV Neutrons and 250-kVp X-rays in Somatic Mutation Induction

Abstract

THE mean linear energy transfers of 650-keV neutrons and of 250-kVp X-rays are so markedly different that it is not usually possible to establish a unique value for their relative biological efficiency. For example, it is well known that the densely ionizing neutrons induce linear dose-response relationships for chromosome aberrations, whereas the dose-response curves for X-rays are often non-linear. Moreover, the former radiation but not the latter is almost independent of environmental factors such as oxygen tension during irradiation. Under certain conditions, and with certain biological test systems, however, some of these difficulties are minimized. For example, Neary et al.1 compared the relative biological efficiency, in terms of chromosome aberration induction, of 0.7- and 3.0-MeV neutrons with cobalt-60 γ-rays administered at low dose rates. There the dose-response relationships were almost linear, and relative biological efficiency values of 35 were obtained; they also derived ultimate maximum relative biological efficiency values from a comparison of the one-hit components of the neutron and γ-dose-response curves and found that these could be as high as 100. Similarly, Smith et al.2, using a test system (somatic mutation induction in dry seed) in which the dose-response relationship for X-rays was linear, obtained an average relative biological efficiency value of about 75 for mono-energetic neutrons of 0.43–1.80 MeV.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neary, G. J., Savage, J. R. K., Evans, H. J., and Whittle, J., Intern. J. Radiation Biol., 6, 127 (1963).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith, H. H., Bateman, J. L., Quastler, H., and Rossi, H. H., I. A. E. A. Symp. Biological Effects of Neutron Irradiation (in the press).

  3. Davies, D. R., Sparrow, A. H., Woodley, R. G., and Maschke, A., Nature, 200, 277 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rossi, H. H., Bateman, J. L., Bond, V. P., Goodman, L. J., and Stickley, E. E., Rad. Res., 13, 503 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Conger, A. D., and Giles, jun., N. H., Genetics, 35, 397 (1950).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Nat. Bur. Stand. U.S. Handbook, No. 63 (1957).

  7. Bateman, J. B. (unpublished results).

  8. Rossi, H. H. (unpublished results).

  9. Cormack, D. Z., and Johns, H. E., Brit. J. Radiol., 25, 369 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Boag, J. W., Nat. Bur. Stand. U.S. Rep. No. 2946 (1953).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DAVIES, D., BATEMAN, J. A High Relative Biological Efficiency of 650-keV Neutrons and 250-kVp X-rays in Somatic Mutation Induction. Nature 200, 485–486 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/200485a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/200485a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing