Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Sound Signals and Alternation Behaviour in Pholidoptera

Abstract

THE classical work of Regen1 on the effect of artificially produced sounds on the stridulation behaviour of Pholidoptera (= Thamnotrizon) aptera (Fab.) has prompted similar work on the related British species Ph. griseoaptera (De Geer), with the view of clarifying our understanding of the factors involved in the alternation ‘singing’ of males and the response to sound by females. There appears to be some confusion in the literature about the conditions under which Regen induced his insects to ‘sing’ in alternation with artificial signals. The widely accepted view2,3 is that he was able to obtain this response only from newly moulted adults which had not already learnt to sing in concert with other males. In fact, Regen points out that young males do not alternate at all until they have ‘sung’ together for some time and his experiments did not begin until they had started to alternate for long periods. There seems to be little evidence that his earlier failures, with older males, were due to learning by the insect, and other work in this field4,5 supports the view that any recognition of the specific ‘song’ is due to inborn mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Regen, J., S.B. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 135, 329 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pumphrey, R. J., Biol. Rev., 15, 107 (1940).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haskell, P. T., Insect Sounds (Witherby, London, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weih, A. S., Z. Tierpsychol., 8, 1 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Busnel, R. G., and Loher, W., Colloque sur l'Acoustique des Orthopteres. Ann. Épiphyt. (tome hors serie), 365 (1955).

  6. Busnel, R. G., Dumortier, B., and Busnel, M. C., Bull. Biol., 90, 219 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

JONES, M. Sound Signals and Alternation Behaviour in Pholidoptera. Nature 199, 928–929 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/199928a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/199928a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing