Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Effect of Scabs on the Rate of Epidermal Regeneration in the Skin Wounds of Guinea Pigs

Abstract

THE effect of scab on the healing of a wound is not well understood. MacCallum's1 idea that the scab may store nutritive material for the granulation tissue is not generally accepted. James2 demonstrated a high concentration of hydroxyproline in the scab hydrolysates but this was shown to be derived from the collagen fibres which had been incorporated into the scab3. Winter4 put forward some experimental evidence designed to show that the scabs retarded the rate of epidermization of wounds in the skin of pigs. During an examination of the various factors which influence the rate of wound healing, observations have been made which are very different from those of Winter's.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacCallum, W. G., A Textbook of Pathology (W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 1940).

    Google Scholar 

  2. James, D. W., J. Path. Bact., 69, 33 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zahir, M., J. Path. Bact., 84, 79 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Winter, G. D., Nature, 193, 293 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ZAHIR, M. Effect of Scabs on the Rate of Epidermal Regeneration in the Skin Wounds of Guinea Pigs. Nature 199, 1013–1014 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/1991013a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1991013a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing