Letter | Published:

Thyroid Dysfunction in Aborted and New-born Calves

Nature volume 193, pages 595596 (10 February 1962) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

A SYNDROME of full-term still-births unassociated with any consistent evidence of infections or other specific causes is one which clinically has been associated with thyroid abnormality in cattle1–3. In a preliminary report on hypothyroidism in cattle2 it was pointed out that the evidence was insufficient to allow any conclusion on the significance of the apparent association of hypothyroidism, as reflected by blood iodine values and fœtal thyroid characteristics, with the clinical picture of aborted, stillborn and weakly calves. In an attempt to get more information on this apparent association, an examination was made of the thyroid glands of all complete aborted bovine fœtuses received at the Reading Veterinary Investigation Centre from the counties of Berkshire, Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire. Thyroid glands judged to be oversized were weighed, and when overweight for the age of fœtus, were prepared for histological examination and iodine analysis. Of 1,629 fœtuses plus a few new-born calves which were examined, 160 from farms where there was a suspected thyroid problem had thyroids which were either overweight or, in a few cases, of normal weight. Of these, 95 were from calves born recently dead at the full term of pregnancy, and 8 from calves born alive but dying within a few days. This syndrome of full-term still-birth is that which clinically has been associated with thyroid abnormality in cattle. Of the remainder, 17 were aborted at 8–9 months' gestation, 25 at 7–8 months, 5 at 6–7 months, 2 at approximately 4 months, and in 8 cases the age was not recorded.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , Mem. Soc. Endocrinol., No. 1, 21 (1953).

  2. 2.

    , , and , Vet. Rec., 66, 367 (1954).

  3. 3.

    , Vet. Rec., 70, 672, 842 (1958).

  4. 4.

    , , and , Brit. Med. J., i, 280 (1959).

  5. 5.

    , , , and , Med. Res. Coun. Mem. No. 18 (H.M.S.O., London, 1948).

  6. 6.

    , , and , Proc. Nutr. Soc., 20, xxxvii (1961).

  7. 7.

    , Imp. Bur. Animal Nutr. Tech. Comm. No. 15 (1944).

  8. 8.

    , , , , and , Excerpta Med. Intern. Cong., Ser. No. 26, Abst. 55 (1960).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Veterinary Investigation Centre, Reading, Berkshire.

    • R. M. LOOSMORE
  2. Central Veterinary Laboratory, Weybridge.

    • RUTH ALLCROFT
    •  & F. J. SALT
  3. Biochemistry Department and Unit of Cell Metabolism, South Parks Road, Oxford.

    • D. E. HUGHES
    • , J. T-Y. CHOU
    •  & DAGMAR C. WILSON

Authors

  1. Search for R. M. LOOSMORE in:

  2. Search for RUTH ALLCROFT in:

  3. Search for F. J. SALT in:

  4. Search for D. E. HUGHES in:

  5. Search for J. T-Y. CHOU in:

  6. Search for DAGMAR C. WILSON in:

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/193595b0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.