Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Subdivision of the Three Common Haptoglobin Types based on ‘Hidden’ Differences

Abstract

PURIFIED haptoglobins of the three common genetic types (Hp 1–1, Hp 2–1 and Hp 2–2), after reductive cleavage with mercaptoethanol in the presence of urea, yield two classes of product (Smithies, O., Connell, G. E., and Dixon, G. H.; in preparation). One group of the cleavage products fails to migrate in acidic starch-gels (except in the presence of 8 M urea), and appears to be common to haptoglobin of all the genetic types. The other cleavage products, which migrate readily, differ according to the genetic type of haptoglobin. The homozygous type haptoglobin 1–1 gives a migrating product different from that obtained with haptoglobin of the other homozygous type 2–2 ; heterozygous haptoglobin gives both products.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ingram, V. M., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 28, 539 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smithies, O., and Walker, N. F., Nature, 176, 1265 (1955); 178, 694 (1956).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, H., Sanger, F., and Kitai, R., Biochem. J., 60, 556 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CONNELL, G., DIXON, G. & SMITHIES, O. Subdivision of the Three Common Haptoglobin Types based on ‘Hidden’ Differences. Nature 193, 505–506 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/193505a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/193505a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing