Letter | Published:

Quantitative Estimation of Peak Areas in Gas-Liquid Chromatography

Nature volume 192, pages 965966 (09 December 1961) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

IN proposing the method referred to by Dijkstra, I tried to stress its convenience rather than its extreme accuracy and the examples which I gave were chosen to show that some lack of agreement might be expected in comparing areas determined by this method with areas determined by other methods. However, as Dijkstra points out, results obtained with other methods are less reproducible. Slight differences in the way in which triangles are drawn and small inaccuracies in cutting out curves can give rise to appreciable differences in estimated area. It is also more difficult to measure peak widths at half height accurately than it is to measure retention times. Furthermore, in the case of overlapping peaks it is frequently impossible to get a good estimate of the individual areas by other methods whereas the retention times and peak heights can still be measured and appropriate corrections for peak height applied if necessary.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Collip Medical Research Laboratory, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.

    • K. K. CARROLL

Authors

  1. Search for K. K. CARROLL in:

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/192965b0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.