Letter | Published:

Purification of Fluorescent Protein Conjugates : Comparison of Charcoal and ‘Sephadex’

Nature volume 192, pages 10731074 (16 December 1961) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

REMOVAL of unreacted fluorescent material from fluorescent protein conjugates is essential for unambiguous interpretation of microscopical findings in immunofluorescence1. Many procedures have been suggested for conjugate purification, but extraction with powdered activated charcoal2 and gel filtration with ‘Sephadex’3,4 are at present the only efficient methods suitable for general application. These two methods have been compared as purification procedures for conjugates of lissamine rhodamine B (RB 200) and fluorescein isothiocyanate. We have confirmed the inefficiency of dialysis5: after exhaustive dialysis (7–10 days), conjugates still contain appreciable unreacted fluorescent material which can be removed by shaking with charcoal or passage through ‘Sephadex’.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , and , in Fluorescent Protein Tracing, edit. by Nairn, R. C., 24 (Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1962).

  2. 2.

    , , and , Immunol., 1, 315 (1958).

  3. 3.

    , and , Acta Histochem., 11, 306 (1961).

  4. 4.

    , , and , Nature, 192, 182 (1961).

  5. 5.

    , and , Immunol., 3, 363 (1960).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Departments of Biological Chemistry and Pathology, University of Aberdeen.

    • J. E. FOTHERGILL
    •  & R. C. NAIRN

Authors

  1. Search for J. E. FOTHERGILL in:

  2. Search for R. C. NAIRN in:

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/1921073a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.