Abstract
Hall and Neale1 have reported accurate measurements of the directions of thermoremanent magnetization acquired by rock specimens which cooled under stress in a low magnetic field. They observed small, but consistent, differences between the directions of thermoremanent magnetization in rocks cooled under stress and without stress, and suggested that their observations conflicted with our results2,3, which indicated the absence of measurable differences in isotropic rocks. However, we consider that the experiments of Hall and Neale are consistent both with our results and with our conclusions, which may be summarized as follows.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hall, J. M., and Neale, R. N., Nature, 188, 805 (1960).
Stott, P. M., and Stacey, F. D., Nature, 183, 384 (1959).
Stott, P. M., and Stacey, F. D., J. Geophys. Res., 65, 2419 (1960).
Stacey, F. D., Nature, 188, 134 (1960).
Stacey, F. D., J. Geophys. Res., 65, 2429 (1960).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
STOTT, P., STACEY, F. Stress Effects on Thermoremanent Magnetization. Nature 191, 585–586 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1038/191585a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/191585a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.