Abstract
DURING the age-grading of female mosquitoes it frequently happens that a large proportion of the dissecting time is devoted to the recognition of those that are nulliparous, when it is usually only the parous ones which require detailed examination. Such a difficulty is encountered to a marked degree in large samples of forest mosquitoes in Uganda, of which more than 95 per cent may be nulliparous. It is therefore desirable to establish means whereby as many nullipars as possible can be recognized without dissection. The use of two external characters for age-grading mosquitoes has been suggested previously1,2, but only recently have techniques become available3 whereby their reliability can be adequately checked. The work reported here was undertaken to determine whether these and two other external characters could be used with confidence to distinguish nullipars of certain African mosquitoes. The condition of each mosquito was checked by dissection of the ovaries4. Results show that in certain species the use of these characters can enable up to 90 per cent of nullipars to be recognized, thereby effecting a great economy in the age-grading of samples.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Perry, R. L., Paludism, 5, 32 (1912).
Gillett, J. D., Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit., 51, 151 (1957).
Detinova, T. S., WHO Course in Advanced Entomological Techniques (London, 1959) (Roneotyped).
Corbet, P. S., Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 53, 297 (1959).
Wharton, R. H., Nature, 184, 830 (1959).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CORBET, P. Recognition of Nulliparous Mosquitoes without Dissection. Nature 187, 525–526 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1038/187525a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/187525a0
This article is cited by
-
10.1007/BF00300528
CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs (2011)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.