Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Suppression of Cytoplasmic Division in Amoeba proteus

Abstract

CYTOPLASMIC division in Amoeba proteus can be suppressed by the application of strong light during the division process1. The same can be achieved as follows. Division is allowed to proceed undisturbed until nuclear division is complete. When the cell becomes elongated and the division furrow appears, slight pressure with a glass needle is applied for short intervals alternately on each one of them, thus shifting parts of the liquid endoplasm back and forth from one prospective daughter cell into the other. After about 7–10 min. of such treatment, without having completed the cleavage the cell resumed its normal interphase appearance. The surface, which had been covered with blebs, becomes smooth, pseudopodia are formed, and the cleavage furrow gradually disappears. Pressure applied for the same length of time before the completion of nuclear division does not prevent either nuclear or cytoplasmic division. Once the furrowing process is suppressed no cytoplasmic division occurs before the next full cell division about 20–28 hr. later.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prescott, D. M., “Rhythmic and Synthetic Processes in Growth”, edit. by Rudnick, D., 59 (Princeton University Press, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Plesner, P. E., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 29, 462 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Swann, M. M., Cancer Res., 17, 727 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guttes, E., and Guttes, S., Science, 129, 1483 (1959).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Prescott, D. M., Exp. Cell Res., 9, 328 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitchison, J. M., Exp. Cell Res., 13, 244 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitchison, J. M., Exp. Cell Res., 15, 214 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GUTTES, E., GUTTES, S. Suppression of Cytoplasmic Division in Amoeba proteus . Nature 187, 520–521 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1038/187520b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/187520b0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing