Abstract
CYTOPLASMIC division in Amoeba proteus can be suppressed by the application of strong light during the division process1. The same can be achieved as follows. Division is allowed to proceed undisturbed until nuclear division is complete. When the cell becomes elongated and the division furrow appears, slight pressure with a glass needle is applied for short intervals alternately on each one of them, thus shifting parts of the liquid endoplasm back and forth from one prospective daughter cell into the other. After about 7–10 min. of such treatment, without having completed the cleavage the cell resumed its normal interphase appearance. The surface, which had been covered with blebs, becomes smooth, pseudopodia are formed, and the cleavage furrow gradually disappears. Pressure applied for the same length of time before the completion of nuclear division does not prevent either nuclear or cytoplasmic division. Once the furrowing process is suppressed no cytoplasmic division occurs before the next full cell division about 20–28 hr. later.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Prescott, D. M., “Rhythmic and Synthetic Processes in Growth”, edit. by Rudnick, D., 59 (Princeton University Press, 1957).
Plesner, P. E., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 29, 462 (1958).
Swann, M. M., Cancer Res., 17, 727 (1958).
Guttes, E., and Guttes, S., Science, 129, 1483 (1959).
Prescott, D. M., Exp. Cell Res., 9, 328 (1955).
Mitchison, J. M., Exp. Cell Res., 13, 244 (1957).
Mitchison, J. M., Exp. Cell Res., 15, 214 (1958).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
GUTTES, E., GUTTES, S. Suppression of Cytoplasmic Division in Amoeba proteus . Nature 187, 520–521 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1038/187520b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/187520b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.