Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Differences in Mechanism in Staining Reactions for Mast Cells

Abstract

MAST cells are usually identified histochemically by the use of aldehyde fuchsin1, Hale2 or Rinehart3 stain, or by the metachromasia they exhibit with certain basic dyes. All these methods demonstrate mucopolysaccharides, although differences in the degree of staining of various mucopolysaccharides with the several methods have been noted4. Peracetic acid oxidation.(Greenspan's mixture 30 min., 25° C.)5 of tissue sections has been found to induce staining of certain normally unreactive substances with aldehyde fuchsin6–8, and to alter the susceptibility of oxytalan fibres to hyaluronidase, lysozyme and elastase7. During the course of investigations of mucopolysaccharide reactivity after peracetic acid oxidation, an interesting change was observed in mast-cell cytoplasms. Peracetic acid oxidation followed by digestion with enzymes which hydrolyse mucopolysaccharides resulted in diverse staining reactions with the above three methods for mucopolysaccharides.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gomori, G., Amer. J. Clin. Path., 20, 665 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hale, C. W., Nature, 157, 802 (1946).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rinehart, J. F., and Abul-Haj, S. K., Arch. Path., 52, 189 (1951).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gomori, G., Brit. J. Exp. Path., 35, 377 (1954).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lillie, R. D., “Histopathologic Technic and Practical Histochemistry”, 2nd edit. (Blakiston, New York, 1954.)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fullmer, H. M., Science, 127, 1240 (1958).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fullmer, H. M., and Lillie, R. D., J. Histochem. and Cytochem., 6, 425 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fullmer, H. M., and Lillie, R. D., Proc. Histochem. Soc. (1958).

  9. Meyer, K., Thompson, R., Palmer, J. W., and Khorazo, D., J. Biol. Chem., 113, 303 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karunairatnam, M. C., Levy, G. A., Biochem. J., 43, 52 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Padawer, J., and Gordon, A. S., Anat. Rec., 121, 411 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Asboe-Hansen, G., and Glick, D., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. and Med., 98, 458 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Morris, A. L., and Krikos, G. A., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. and Med., 97, 527 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FULLMER, H. Differences in Mechanism in Staining Reactions for Mast Cells. Nature 183, 1274–1275 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1038/1831274a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1831274a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing