Abstract
IN his review of my book “Statistical Methods in Electrical Engineering” (Nature, March 19, p. 484), Mr. F. Downton criticizes my statement that Bayes' theorem is controversial. The heading of the paragraph in Sir Ronald Fisher's book which I cited is “The Rejection of Inverse Probability”. Coupled with the lack of mention of Bayes beyond the introductory chapter, I can only take this to mean that the author did not accept the rigorous validity of anything which Bayes formulated. To me, therefore, it appears that Mr. Downton's statement is demonstrably untrue. Faced with this controversial issue when writing a practical book, I decided to mention the existence of the controversy and then take a firm decision (the opposite of Fisher's) which was justified primarily on empirical grounds.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BELL, D. “Applied Statistics”. Nature 175, 1004 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1038/1751004a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1751004a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.