Cord Blood Stem Cell

Phase II study of unrelated cord blood transplantation for adults with high-risk hematologic malignancies

Article metrics

Abstract

Cell dose is a critical determinant of outcomes in unrelated cord blood (CB) transplantation. We investigated a strategy in which CB units should contain at least 2 × 107 total nucleated cells/kg of recipient weight, otherwise a second unit had to be added. We report the results of a study that was prematurely closed owing to toxicity. Patients with advanced hematologic malignancies without a human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling or unrelated donor were eligible. Conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine and 12 Gy of total body irradiation (n=11), or melphalan (n=4), with antithymocyte globulin. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis was tacrolimus and methotrexate. Fifteen patients with acute leukemia (n=9), chronic myelogenous leukemia (n=2), multiple myeloma (n=2) and lymphoma (n=2) were treated; 60% had relapsed disease at transplantation. Three patients received double CB transplants. The 100-day and 1-year treatment-related mortality rates were 40 and 53%, respectively. Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 22 days (n=10) and 37 days (n=10), respectively. One patient had secondary graft failure and five patients failed to engraft. Two patients are alive and disease free; 4-year actuarial survival is 33 versus 0% for patients transplanted in remission versus in relapse. We concluded that disease status was the main determinant of treatment failure in this study.

Introduction

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the treatment of choice for a variety of hematologic malignancies, but only 20–30% of the patients in need of HSCT are expected to have a suitable donor in the family.1 Conversely, the probability of success of a bone marrow- or peripheral blood-matched unrelated donor search is related to ethnicity, and is limited by stringent matching criteria. Furthermore, delays intrinsic to the search process may impact decidedly in the outcome of transplantation for diseases at high risk of relapse or progression. Using mismatched unrelated donors may increase the donor pool, but this type of transplant carries a high risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and severely impaired immune recovery.

Umbilical cord blood (UCB) provides an alternative to mismatched hematopoietic grafts.2 Cord blood (CB) procurement is fast and there are reports indicating a reduced incidence of severe GVHD.3, 4, 5 Interestingly, lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells from CB have been shown to have higher apoptotic-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro, when compared to bone marrow-derived LAK cells. This provides one of the potential explanations for preserved graft-versus-leukemia effect with this type of graft,6, 7 which contains a small number of lymphocytes.

The major limitation of the use of UCB transplantation for adults is the relatively small number of hematopoietic stem cells. This problem is associated with high rates of early treatment-related mortality (TRM) owing to delayed engraftment. In order to overcome this barrier, we investigated a strategy by which patients without higher priority donors were to be transplanted with an unrelated CB unit that should contain at least 2 × 107 total nucleated cells (TNCs)/kg of recipient weight. If one unit containing that cell number was not available, a second unit had to be added in order to achieve that target. Here, we report the results of a phase II trial that enrolled heavily pretreated patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies that was prematurely interrupted owing to high rates of engraftment failure and excessive mortality.

Methods

Eligibility criteria

The upper age limit for participation was 55 years. Patients should have high-risk hematologic malignancies. Up to three human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches between CB units and recipients were allowed (low resolution typing at HLA-A and -B loci, and high-resolution typing at HLA-DRB1). If one unit providing at least 2 × 107 TNC/kg was not available, pooled units (up to three CB units) were to be used in order to achieve that target. This cell dose was arbitrarily chosen in order to maximize the speed of engraftment. Patients with adequate organ function, capable of providing written informed consent were eligible. Patients were not eligible if they had an HLA-compatible related or unrelated donor, defined as an unrelated donor that matched on HLA-A, -B and DRB1, or a related donor that either matched on HLA-A, -B and -DRB1 or had one mismatch in these loci. The Institutional Review Board of the MD Anderson Cancer Center approved the study protocol, and all patients gave informed consent upon enrollment.

Pretransplantation conditioning

Patients eligible for a myeloablative preparative regimen were treated with a total of 3 Gy of total body irradiation (TBI) daily on days −9 to −6. Fludarabine (30 mg/m2) was given on days −5 to −2 daily, and transplant was performed on day 0. Patients with multiple myeloma or those not eligible for the TBI-based regimen owing to co-morbid conditions were given fludarabine at the same dose, and melphalan 180 mg/m2. Filgrastim (5 μg/kg/day) was given from day +7 until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) reached 1000/μl for at least 3 days. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus (targeting levels of 5–15 ng/ml) and methotrexate (5 mg/m2) on transplant days 1, 3 and 6. All patients received rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) 3 mg/kg, administered on transplant days −5, −4, −3 and −2. Supportive care including prophylactic antibiotics and transfusion of blood products followed institutional standards. Cytomegalovirus antigenemia was monitored twice weekly, and pre-emptive treatment with foscarnet started in case of any positive result. Whenever possible, autologous stem cells were collected and stored as a back up in case of graft failure.

Engraftment, GVHD and chimerism

Engraftment was defined as the first of three consecutive days with an ANC greater than 0.5. × 109/l. Platelet engraftment was defined as the first of seven consecutive days when the platelet count exceeded 20 × 109/l without transfusion support. Failure to engraft neutrophils by day 42 was considered as primary graft failure. GVHD was scored as per consensus criteria.8 Chimerism was monitored using fluorescent in situ hybridization studies in sex-mismatched cases for Y chromosome, and by DNA microsatellite polymorphisms by polymerase chain reaction with D6S264, D3S1282, D18S62 and D3S1300 fluorescence-labeled primers.

Statistical considerations

This was a phase II trial that used a Bayesian sequential monitoring design for single-arm clinical trials with multiple outcomes, as proposed by Thall et al.9 Patients were scored as ‘success’ if they were alive, engrafted and without GVHD on day +100. The trial was prematurely stopped in January 2003 owing to excessive number of early failures.

Results

Patients and preparative regimens

Fifteen patients with a median age of 34 years (range, 19–56 years) and a median weight of 71 kg (range, 49–99 kg) received a median TNC of 3.2 × 107 (range, 1.9 × 107−5.2 × 107) from one or two cords. Three donor–recipient pairs had only one HLA mismatch, whereas all others had more than one HLA mismatch. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Only six patients (40%) were in complete remission at the time of transplantation.

Table 1 Patient and CB characteristics

We used the melphalan-based conditioning regimen to treat four patients, with multiple myeloma (n=2), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=1) and acute lymphocytic leukemia (n=1). Eleven patients received the TBI-based preparative regimen.

Engraftment

Ten patients engrafted neutrophils at a median of 22 days (range, 15–38 days). Autologous peripheral blood stem cells were used to rescue a patient in sepsis and delayed pancytopenia (UPIN 6). Another patient had recovery of autologous hemopoiesis. Three additional patients had neither engraftment nor autologous hematopoietic reconstitution. Platelet engraftment was documented in 10 cases at a median of 37 days (range, 23–60 days). Six patients achieved a platelet count greater than 50 000/mm3, and three patients reached a count greater than 100 000/mm3 without transfusions. Red cell transfusion independence was achieved in seven cases.

Graft-versus-host disease

Acute skin GVHD was diagnosed in three patients (incidence of 33%; grade I in one case and grade II in two cases). There were no instances of grade III or IV acute GVHD, and no cases of hepatic or gastrointestinal GVHD. One of the two patients with acute grade II GVHD went on to develop extensive chronic skin GVHD that required systemic treatment with steroids, daclizumab and PUVA. All cases of acute GVHD were responsive to steroids, but one patient died of chronic GVHD-related complications.

Survival and non-relapse mortality

Two patients transplanted in remission are alive and disease free. Median survival was 124 days. Actuarial 1- and 4-year survival rates were 13 and 13%, respectively. Kaplan–Meier estimate of survival is shown in Figure 1. The 100-day and 1-year TRM rates for the whole group were 40 and 53%, respectively. TRM rates at 100 days and 1 year after treatment were 17 and 50% for patients transplanted in remission, as opposed to 44 and 55% for those treated with active disease. Two patients died of diffuse alveolar hemorrhage and two patients developed adenovirus infections (fatal in one case). Eleven patients developed a severe fungal or viral infection, whereas GVHD-related complications were the cause of demise in one case. Four patients surviving more than 30 days did not engraft. Diagnoses were chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) (n=2), multiple myeloma (n=1) and diffuse large-cell lymphoma (n=1). Furthermore, one patient died early, 13 days after transplantation, without signs of engraftment. Outcomes are summarized in Table 2.

Figure 1
figure1

Survival and disease status at transplantation. Overall survival after unrelated donor CB transplantation as a function of disease status (P=0.04, log rank test).

Table 2 Patient outcome

Discussion

Long-term follow-up of our small cohort of heavily pretreated patients showed a 4-year survival rate of approximately 33% for patients in remission. The early mortality and engraftment failure rates were deemed excessive and led to premature trial discontinuation.

There are several potential explanations for these results. The most important variable was disease status at transplantation, associated with extensive prior treatment and poor tolerance to transplant-associated toxicities, factors that likely increased TRM. Here, selection of relatively large CB units with a median total infused nucleated cell count/kg of 3.2 × 107 did not impact early mortality, as observed in other series.10, 11 Use of CB units containing TNC doses below 1–1.5 × 107 is associated with high rates of engraftment failure, and accordingly, we attempted combination of units in three cases in order to optimize the cell dose. Despite our approach, we observed a high rate of primary engraftment failure. It is possible that a diagnosis of CML was an added risk factor in two of our cases as it has been suggested.11 In the multicenter Cord Blood Transplantation (COBLT) study, 34% of the adult patients failed to achieve donor hematopoiesis.12 Comparisons of published results are sometimes difficult to perform given that definitions of engraftment failure differ in the literature, but it is commonly accepted that lack of neutrophil recovery by day 42 indicates a very low likelihood of success. The competing risk of death before engraftment is frequently not taken into consideration, an approach that makes the interpretation of the data very difficult and subject to biases.

Our 100-day mortality rate of 40% was similar to that observed in the COBLT study, which reported a 100-day survival probability of 0.47, with approximately 17% of the patients alive after 12 months.12 Similarly, Sanz et al.13 reported a 100-day TRM of 43% in a cohort of 22 adults (median age of 29 years) with hematologic malignancies. All patients with acute leukemia were in complete remission, whereas most of the CML patients were in chronic phase, comprising a better risk group. Lower 100-day mortality has been reported by several single-center studies.14, 15 The Minnesota group transplanted 23 patients with a median age of 24 years and observed a 6-month TRM of 22%.14 Although these results may indicate the influence of growing experience using this source of stem cells, one cannot underestimate the effect of patient selection on outcomes.

At the time our trial was initiated, we allowed the use of units with three HLA mismatches. Such degree of donor–recipient mismatch is now a well-known risk factor for poor survival.11 Three patients were so treated (combined with another unit in one instance). Therefore, the degree of matching contributed to the poor results. Another potential criticism is our GVHD prophylaxis that employed ‘mini’ methotrexate. There is evidence that this drug may contribute to excess mortality, at least when used in higher doses than the ones employed here. Interestingly, the combination of tacrolimus and mini-methotrexate has been used without excessive toxicity in the pediatric setting.16

Fludarabine and melphalan was the preparative regimen in four cases. One patient engrafted, whereas three patients did not. In light of these results, we cannot recommend the use of this regimen in this setting. Other groups have however reported improved results using a reduced-intensity approach to reduce TRM.17, 18 High-dose ATG was part of our conditioning regimens, but its use to improve engraftment and possibly decrease the incidence of GVHD is controversial. This drug has been reported to delay immune recovery, and we are currently using significantly reduced doses.19

Only three of our nine engrafted patients developed acute GVHD without visceral involvement, whereas one patient died of chronic GVHD. Again, the competing risk of early mortality owing to infections and toxicity makes this low rate difficult to interpret. In the COBLT study, GVHD was the leading cause of death.12

How can these results be improved? Cell dose is critical. It is unclear, however, if doubling the cell dose by combining two units, for example, will be enough to improve outcomes. At this point, there are no controlled studies comparing double versus single CB transplants. Another approach that we are currently investigating involves ex vivo expansion of CB progenitor cells, in an attempt to circumvent cell dose-related problems.20, 21, 22

CB carries the potential to extend hematopoietic transplantation to a variety of patients otherwise not eligible for this form of treatment. However, our results would indicate that high-risk patients have an increased probability of TRM even with the use of units containing higher TNC counts, and that treatment of relapsed patients should only be pursued under controlled clinical trials.

References

  1. 1

    Appelbaum FR . The current status of hematopoietic cell transplantation. Annu Rev Med 2003; 54: 491–512.

  2. 2

    Barker JN, Weisdorf DJ, Wagner JE . Creation of a double chimera after the transplantation of umbilical-cord blood from two partially matched unrelated donors. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1870–1871.

  3. 3

    Rocha V, Labopin M, Sanz G, Arcese W, Schwerdtfeger R, Bosi A et al. Transplants of umbilical cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with Acute Leukemia. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2276–2285.

  4. 4

    Gluckman E, Rocha V, Arcese W, Michel G, Sanz G, Chan KW et al. Factors associated with outcomes of unrelated cord blood transplant: guidelines for donor choice. Exp Hematol 2004; 32: 397–407.

  5. 5

    Laughlin MJ, Eapen M, Rubinstein P, Wagner JE, Zhang MJ, Champlin RE et al. Outcomes after transplantation of cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with leukemia. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2265–2275.

  6. 6

    Haut PR, Gonzalez-Ryan L, Wang LJ, Olszewski M, Morgan E, Kletzel M . Induction of a transient graft vs leukemia effect following unrelated cord blood transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2002; 6: 348–351.

  7. 7

    Gardiner CM, Carver J, Abraham BL, Wilson JB, Huisman TH . Differential cytotoxicity of cord blood and bone marrow-derived natural killer cells. Blood 1998; 91: 207–213.

  8. 8

    Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemman HG, Beatty P, Hows J et al. 1994 consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transplant 1994; 15: 824–828.

  9. 9

    Thall PF, Simon RM, Estey EH . Bayesian sequential monitoring designs for single-arm clinical trials with multiple outcomes. Stat Med 1995; 14: 357–379.

  10. 10

    Laughlin MJ, Barker J, Barbach B, Koc ON, Rizzieri DA, Wagner JE et al. Hematopoietic engraftment and survival in adults recipients of umbilical-cord blood from unrelated donors. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1815–1822.

  11. 11

    Rubinstein P, Carrier C, Scaradavou A, Kurtzberg J, Adamson J, Migliaccio AR et al. Outcomes among 562 recipients of placental-blood transplants from unrelated donors. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1565–1577.

  12. 12

    Cornetta K, Laughlin M, Carter S, Wall D, Weinthal J, Delaney C et al. Umbilical cord blood transplantation in adults: results of the prospective Cord Blood Transplantation (COBLT). Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2005; 11: 149–160.

  13. 13

    Sanz GF, Saavedra S, Phanelles D, Senent L, Cervera J, Barragan E et al. Standardized, unrelated donor cord blood transplantation in adults with hematologic malignancies. Blood 2001; 98: 2332–2338.

  14. 14

    Barker JN, Weisdorf DJ, Defor TE, Blazar BR, McGlave PB, Miller JS et al. Transplantation of 2 partially HLA-matched umbilical cord blood units to enhance engraftment in adults with hematologic malignancy. Blood 2005; 105: 1343–1347.

  15. 15

    Takahashi S, Iseki T, Ooi J, Tomonari A, Takasugi K, Shimohakamada Y et al. Single-institute comparative analysis of unrelated bone marrow transplantation and cord blood transplantation for adult patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood 2004; 104: 3813–3820.

  16. 16

    Przepiorka D, Petropoulos D, Mullen CA, Danielson M, Mattewada V, Chan KW . Tacrolimus for prevention of graft-versus-host disease after mismatched unrelated donor cord blood transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 12: 1291–1295.

  17. 17

    Miyakoshi S, Yuji K, Kami M, Kusumi E, Kishi Y, Kobayashi K et al. Successful engraftment after reduced-intensity umbilical cord blood transplantation for adult patients with advanced hematological diseases. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 3586–3592.

  18. 18

    Barker JN, Weisdorf DJ, DeFor TE, Blazar BR, Miller JS, Wagner JE . Rapid and complete donor chimerism in adult recipients of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning. Blood 2003; 102: 1915–1919.

  19. 19

    Meijer E, Bloem AC, Dekker AW, Verdonck LF . Effect of antithymocyte globulin on quantitative immune recovery and graft-versus-host disease after partially T-cell-depleted bone marrow transplantation: a comparison between recipients of matched related and matched unrelated donor grafts. Transplantation 2003; 75: 1910–1913.

  20. 20

    Peled T, Mandel J, Goudsmid RN, Landor C, Hasson N, Harati D et al. Pre-clinical development of cord blood-derived progenitor cell graft expanded ex vivo with cytokines and the polyamine copper chelator tetraethylenepentamine. Cytotherapy 2004; 6: 344–355.

  21. 21

    McNiece I, Harrington J, Turney J, Kellner J, Shpall EJ . Ex vivo expansion of cord blood mononuclear cells on mesenchymal stem cells. Cytotherapy 2004; 6: 311–317.

  22. 22

    Shpall E, Quinones R, Giller R, Zeng C, Baron AE, Jones RB et al. Transplantation of ex vivo expanded cord blood. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2002; 8: 376–381.

  23. 23

    de Lima M, St John LS, Wieder ED, Lee MS, McMannis J, Karandish S et al. Double-chimaerism after transplantation of two human leucocyte antigen mismatched, unrelated cord blood units. Brit J Haem 2002; 119: 773–776.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to M de Lima.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Keywords

  • cord blood transplantation
  • leukemia
  • phase II study

Further reading