Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Post-Transplant Events

Difference in time to positivity is useful for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Bone Marrow Transplantation volume 35, pages 397–401 (2005)Cite this article

Summary:

Catheter-related bloodstream infections are associated with recognized morbidity and mortality. Accurate diagnosis of such infections results in proper management of patients and in reducing unnecessary removal of catheters. We carried out a prospective study in a bone marrow transplant unit to assess the validity of a test based on the earlier positivity of central venous blood cultures in comparison with peripheral blood cultures for predicting catheter-related bacteremia. Between May 2002 and June 2004, 38 bloodstream infections with positive simultaneous central venous catheter and peripheral vein blood cultures were included. A total of 22 patients had catheter-related bacteremias and 16 had noncatheter-related bacteremias, using the catheter-tip culture/clinical criteria as the criterion standard to define catheter-related bacteremia. Differential time to positivity of 120 min or more was associated with 86% sensitivity and 87% specificity. In conclusion, differential time to positivity of 120 min or more is sensitive and specific for catheter-related bacteremia in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients who have nontunnelled short-term catheters.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maki DG, Mermel LA . Infections due to infusion therapy. In: Bennett JV, Brachman PS (eds). Hospital Infections. Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia, 1998, pp 689–724.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jarvis WR, Edwards JR, Culver DH et al. Nosocomial infection rates in adult and pediatric intensive care units in the United States. National nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991; 91: 185S–191S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McGee DC, Gould MK . Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1123–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Siegman-Igra Y, Anglim AM, Shapiro DE et al. Diagnosis of vascular catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35: 928–936.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sheretz RJ, Heard SO, Raad II . Diagnosis of triple-lumen catheter infection: comparison of roll plate, sonication, and flushing methodologies. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35: 641–646.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Widmer AF, Nettleman M, Flint K, Wenzel RP . The clinical impact of culturing central venous catheters. A prospective study. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152: 1299–1302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fan ST, Teoh-Chan CH, Lau KF . Evaluation of central venous catheter sepsis by differential quantitative blood culture. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1989; 8: 142–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Capdevila JA, Planes AM, Palomar M et al. Value of differential quantitative blood cultures in the diagnosis of catheter-related sepsis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1992; 11: 403–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blot F, Schimdt E, Nitenberg G et al. Earlier positivity of central-venous versus peripheral-blood cultures is highly predictive of catheter-related sepsis. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36: 105–109.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Blot F, Nitenberg G, Chachaty E et al. Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteraemia: a prospective comparison of the time to positivity of hub-blood versus peripheral-blood cultures. Lancet 1999; 354: 1071–1077.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Malgrange VB, Escande MC, Theobald S . Validity of earlier positivity of central venous blood cultures in comparison with peripheral blood cultures for diagnosing catheter-related bacteremia in cancer patients. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39: 274–278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Seifert H, Cornely O, Seggewiss K et al. Bloodstream infection in neutropenic cancer patients related to short-term nontunnelled catheters determined by quantitative blood cultures, differential time to positivity, and molecular epidemiological typing with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 118–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaur AH, Flynn PM, Giannini MA et al. Difference in time to detection: a simple method to differentiate catheter-related from non catheter-related bloodstream infection in immunocompromised pediatric patients. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 37: 469–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Raad I, Hanna HA, Alakech B et al. Differential time to positivity: a useful method for diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rijnders BJ, Verwaest C, Peetermans WE et al. Difference in time to positivity of hub-blood versus nonhub-blood cultures is not useful for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 1399–1403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Seldinger SI . Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography: a new technique. Acta Radiol 1953; 39: 368–376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brun-Buisson C, Abrouk F, Legrand P et al. Diagnosis of central venous catheter-related sepsis. Arch Intern Med 1987; 147: 873–877.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Raad I, Bodey GP . Infectious complications of indwelling vascular catheters. Clin Infect Dis 1992; 15: 197–210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mermel LA, Farr BM, Sheretz RJ et al. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32: 1249–1272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Krzywda EA, Andris DA, Edmiston CE, Quebbeman EJ . Treatment of Hickman catheter sepsis using antibiotic lock technique. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995; 16: 596–608.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Messing B, Man F, Colimon R et al. Antibiotic lock technique is an effective treatment of bacterial catheter related sepsis during parenteral nutrition. Clin Nutr 1990; 9: 220–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre National de Greffe de Moelle Osseuse, Tunis, Tunisia

    A Abdelkefi, W Achour, T Ben Othman, L Torjman, S Ladeb, A Lakhal, L Kammoun, A Ben Hassen & A Ben Abdeladhim

  2. Institut National de la Santé Publique, Tunis, Tunisia

    M Hsaïri

Authors
  1. A Abdelkefi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W Achour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T Ben Othman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. L Torjman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S Ladeb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A Lakhal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M Hsaïri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. L Kammoun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. A Ben Hassen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. A Ben Abdeladhim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Abdelkefi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdelkefi, A., Achour, W., Ben Othman, T. et al. Difference in time to positivity is useful for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 35, 397–401 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704773

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704773

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links