Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Engraftment

Engraftment kinetics of human CD34+ cells from cord blood and mobilized peripheral blood co-transplanted into NOD/SCID mice

Summary:

We have reported short periods of post transplant neutropenia in human patients co-transplanted with cord blood (CB) and low numbers of haploidentical mobilized peripheral blood (MPB) CD34+ cells. To investigate the effect that the proportion of MPB to CB cells may have on engraftment kinetics, we have co-transplanted fixed numbers of human CB CD34+ cells mixed with different numbers of MPB CD34+ cells into NOD/SCID mice. We periodically quantified the proportion of human cells and the relative contribution of MPB and CB cells to the human engraftment on marrow aspirates. At the lowest MPB/CB ratios (5 : 1, 10 : 1), the contribution of CB cells predominated at all time points analyzed, and in three out of four experiments MPB cell contributions progressively decreased from day +15. At higher MPB/CB ratios, MPB cells had a more important contribution to both early and late engraftment, with the highest cell ratio resulting in only marginal CB cell engraftment. Therefore, our results showed greater potential, on a per cell basis, of human CB vs MPB cells for competitive sustained engraftment in the xenogeneic model used, which was only abrogated by the co-infusion of very high numbers of MPB cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gluckman E, Rocha V, Boyer-Chammard A et al. Outcome of cord blood transplantation from related and unrelated donors. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 373–381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rubinstein P, Carrier C, Scaradavou A et al. Outcome among 562 recipients of placental blood transplants from unrelated donors. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1565–1577.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gluckman E . Status of umbilical cord blood hematopoietic transplantation. Exp Hematol 2000; 28: 1197–1205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wagner JE, Barker JN, DeFor T et al. Transplantation of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood in 2 patients with malignant and non-malignant disease: influence of CD34+ cell dose and HLA disparity on treatment related mortality and survival. Blood 2002; 100: 1611–1618.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rocha V, Cornish J, Sievers EL et al. Comparison of outcomes of unrelated bone marrow and umbilical cord blood transplants in children with acute leukaemia. Blood 2001; 97: 2962–2971.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Michel G, Rocha V, Chevret S et al. Unrelated cord blood transplantation for childhood acute myeloid leukemia: a Eurocord group analysis. Blood 2003; 102: 4290–4297.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Takahashi S, Iseki T, Ooi J et al. Single-institute comparative analysis of unrelated bone marrow transplantation and cord blood transplantation for adult patients with hematological malignancies. Blood First Edition Paper. Prepublished Online July 27, 2004; DOI 10.1182/Blood-2004-03-1001.

  8. Fernández MN, Regidor C, Cabrera R et al. Unrelated umbilical cord blood transplants in adults: early recovery of neutrophils by supportive co-transplantation of a low number of highly purified peripheral blood CD34+ cells from an HLA-haploidentical donor. Exp Hematol 2003; 31: 535–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernández MN, Regidor C, Cabrera R et al. Dual transplants of unrelated cord blood and highly purified CD34+ cells from a related voluntary donor in adults: updated results (Eurocord-III study).– 30th Annual Meeting of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Barcelona, 2004. Bone Marrow Transplant 2004; 33 (Suppl 1) Abstract 320.

  10. Rosler ES, Brandt JE, Chute J, Hoffman R . An in vivo competitive repopulation assay for various sources of human hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 2000; 96: 3414–3421.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schiedlmeier B, Klump H, Will E et al. High-level ectopic HOXB4 expression confers a profound in vivo competitive growth advantage on human cord blood CD34+ cells, but impairs lymphomyeloid differentiation. Blood 2003; 101: 1759–1768.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hess DA, Karanu FN, Levac K et al. Coculture and transplant of purified CD34(+)Lin(−) and CD34(−)Lin(−) cells reveals functional interaction between repopulating hematopoietic stem cells. Leukemia 2003; 17: 1613–1625.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Regidor C, Posada M, Monteagudo D et al. Umbilical cord blood banking for unrelated transplantation: evaluation of cell and storage methods. Exp Hematol 1999; 27: 380–385.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rubinstein P, Dobrila L, Rosenfield RE et al. Processing and cryopreservation of placental/umbilical cord blood for unrelated bone marrow reconstitution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1995; 92: 10119–10122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Verlinden SF, van Es HH, van Bekkum DW . Serial bone marrow sampling for long-term follow up of human hematopoiesis in NOD/SCID mice. Exp Hematol 1998; 26: 627–630.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thiede C, Lion T . Quantitative analysis of chimerism after allogeneic stem cell transplantation using multiplex PCR amplification of short tandem repeat markers and fluorescence detection. Leukemia 2001; 15: 303–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Leung W, Ramirez M, Novelli EM, Civin CI . In vivo engraftment potential of clinical hematopoietic grafts. J Invest Med 1998; 46: 303–311.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Barker JN, Weisdorf DJ, Wagner JE . Creation of a double chimera after the transplantation of umbilical-cord blood from two partially matched unrelated donors. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1870–1871 (letter).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de Lima M, St. John LS, Wieder ED et al. Double-chimaerism after transplantation of two human leucocyte antigen mismatched, unrelated cord blood units. Br J Haematol 2002; 119: 773–776.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barker JN, Weisdorf DJ, Defor TE et al. Rapid and complete donor chimerism in adult recipients of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning. Blood 2003; 102: 1915–1919.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramirez M, Rottman GA, Shultz LD, Civin CI . Mature human hematopoietic cells in donor bone marrow complicate interpretation of stem/progenitor cell assays in xenogeneic hematopoietic chimeras. Exp Hematol 1998; 26: 332–344.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Güenechea G, Segovia JC, Abella B et al. Delayed engraftment of non-obese/severe immunodeficient mice transplanted with ex-vivo expanded human CD34+ cord blood cells. Blood 1999; 93: 1097–1105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D Sánchez-Mora and Y Gutiérrez (CPH), and Jesús Martínez (CIEMAT) for technical assistance. This work was conducted as part of the Eurocord III Project and with partial support of the FIS Grant PI-03/0961.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M N Fernández.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramírez, M., Regidor, C., Marugán, I. et al. Engraftment kinetics of human CD34+ cells from cord blood and mobilized peripheral blood co-transplanted into NOD/SCID mice. Bone Marrow Transplant 35, 271–275 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704765

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704765

Keywords

Search

Quick links