Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

HLA Matching

Impact of HLA matching on outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with inherited diseases: a single-center comparative analysis of genoidentical, haploidentical or unrelated donors

Summary:

Hematological inherited diseases can be cured by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from an human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling donor (MSD), but the outcome of unrelated donors (URD) or haploidentical donors (HMD) has been a cause of concern. In all, 94 children affected with inherited diseases underwent HSCT at a single center using MSD (group A, n=31), URD (group B, n=23) or HMD (group C, n=40). There was no difference in the rate of engraftment or in the incidence of grades III–IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) between the groups. Survival rate was 80.6% in group A, 62.5% in group B and 47.5% in group C (P=0.023). In group B, survival rate was 73.7% in the subgroup with zero or one class I mismatch, and 25% in the subgroup with two or more class I mismatches (P=0.04). In group C, survival rate was 83.3% in the 9/10-identical subgroup, 64.3% in the seven or 8/10 subgroup, and 25% in the five or 6/10 subgroup (P=0.0007). Thus, engraftment, incidence of GVHD and survival are similar in recipients of grafts from MSD, URD with 0–1 class I-mismatch, or HMD with at least 7/10 HLA matches. The low success of HSCT using more disparate donors suggests reserving them for patients with very poor prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hansen JA, Petersdorf E, Martin PJ, Anasetti C . Hematopoietic stem cell transplants from unrelated donors. Immunol Rev 1997; 157: 141–151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fischer A, Landais P, Friedrich W et al. European experience of bone-marrow transplantation for severe combined immunodeficiency. Lancet 1990; 336: 850–854.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beatty PG, Clift RA, Mickelson EM et al. Marrow transplantation from related donors other than HLA-identical siblings. N Engl J Med 1985; 313: 765–771.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kernan NA, Bartsch G, Ash RC et al. Analysis of 462 transplantations from unrelated donors facilitated by the National Marrow Donor Program. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 593–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Madrigal JA, Scott I, Arguello R et al. Factors influencing the outcome of bone marrow transplants using unrelated donors. Immunol Rev 1997; 157: 153–166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tiercy JM, Villard J, Roosnek E . Selection of unrelated bone marrow donors by serology, molecular typing and cellular assays. Transpl Immunol 2002; 10: 215–221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott I, O'Shea J, Bunce M et al. Molecular typing shows a high level of HLA class I incompatibility in serologically well matched donor/patient pairs: implications for unrelated bone marrow donor selection. Blood 1998; 92: 4864–4871.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Speiser DE, Tiercy JM, Rufer N et al. High resolution HLA matching associated with decreased mortality after unrelated bone marrow transplantation. Blood 1996; 87: 4455–4462.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hansen JA, Gooley TA, Martin PJ et al. Bone marrow transplants from unrelated donors for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 962–968.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Petersdorf EW, Longton GM, Anasetti C et al. The significance of HLA-DRB1 matching on clinical outcome after HLA-A, B, DR identical unrelated donor marrow transplantation. Blood 1995; 86: 1606–1613.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Devergie A, Apperley JF, Labopin M et al. European results of matched unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia. Impact of HLA class II matching. Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 20: 11–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Petersdorf EW, Hansen JA, Martin PJ et al. Major-histocompatibility-complex class I alleles and antigens in hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 1794–1800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Petersdorf EW, Gooley TA, Anasetti C et al. Optimizing outcome after unrelated marrow transplantation by comprehensive matching of HLA class I and II alleles in the donor and recipient. Blood 1998; 92: 3515–3520.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sasazuki T, Juji T, Morishima Y et al. Effect of matching of class I HLA alleles on clinical outcome after transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells from an unrelated donor. Japan Marrow Donor Program. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 1177–1185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Drobyski WR, Klein J, Flomenberg N et al. Superior survival associated with transplantation of matched unrelated versus one-antigen-mismatched unrelated or highly human leukocyte antigen-disparate haploidentical family donor marrow grafts for the treatment of hematologic malignancies: establishing a treatment algorithm for recipients of alternative donor grafts. Blood 2002; 99: 806–814.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Petersdorf EW, Anasetti C, Martin PJ, Hansen JA . Tissue typing in support of unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation. Tissue Antigens 2003; 61: 1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Casper J, Camitta B, Truitt R et al. Unrelated bone marrow donor transplants for children with leukemia or myelodysplasia. Blood 1995; 85: 2354–2363.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oakhill A, Pamphilon DH, Potter MN et al. Unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation for children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in second complete remission. Br J Haematol 1996; 94: 574–578.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Woolfrey AE, Anasetti C, Storer B et al. Factors associated with outcome after unrelated marrow transplantation for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. Blood 2002; 99: 2002–2008.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Al-Kasim FA, Thornley I, Rolland M et al. Single-centre experience with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in childhood: similar survival after matched-related and matched-unrelated donor transplants. Br J Haematol 2002; 116: 483–490.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Veys PA, Meral A, Hassan A et al. Haploidentical related transplants and unrelated donor transplants with T cell addback. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998; 21 (Suppl. 2): S42–S44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jabado N, Le Deist F, Cant A et al. Bone marrow transplantation from genetically HLA-nonidentical donors in children with fatal inherited disorders excluding severe combined immunodeficiencies: use of two monoclonal antibodies to prevent graft rejection. Pediatrics 1996; 98: 420–428.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A et al. Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow from HL-A-matched sibling donors. Transplantation 1974; 18: 295–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Petersdorf EW, Smith AG, Mickelson EM et al. The role of HLA-DPB1 disparity in the development of acute graft-versus- host disease following unrelated donor marrow transplantation. Blood 1993; 81: 1923–1932.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Prasad VK, Heller G, Kernan NA et al. The probability of HLA-C matching between patient and unrelated donor at the molecular level: estimations based on the linkage disequilibrium between DNA typed HLA-B and HLA-C alleles. Transplantation 1999; 68: 1044–1050.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hurley CK, Baxter-Lowe LA, Begovich AB et al. The extent of HLA class II allele level disparity in unrelated bone marrow transplantation: analysis of 1259 National Marrow Donor Program donor-recipient pairs. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 25: 385–393.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. El Kassar N, Legouvello S, Joseph CM et al. High resolution HLA class I and II typing and CTLp frequency in unrelated donor transplantation: a single-institution retrospective study of 69 BMTs. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 27: 35–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fleischhauer K, Kernan NA, O'Reilly RJ et al. Bone marrow-allograft rejection by T lymphocytes recognizing a single amino acid difference in HLA-B44. N Engl J Med 1990; 323: 1818–1822.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ferrara GB, Bacigalupo A, Lamparelli T et al. Bone marrow transplantation from unrelated donors: the impact of mismatches with substitutions at position 116 of the human leukocyte antigen class I heavy chain. Blood 2001; 98: 3150–3155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Guardiola P, Pasquini R, Dokal I et al. Outcome of 69 allogeneic stem cell transplantations for Fanconi anemia using HLA-matched unrelated donors: a study on behalf of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Blood 2000; 95: 422–429.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Antoine C, Muller S, Cant A et al. Long-term survival and transplantation of haemopoietic stem cells for immunodeficiencies: report of the European experience 1968–99. Lancet 2003; 361: 553–560.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Green A, Clarke E, Hunt L et al. Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who receive T-cell-depleted HLA mismatched marrow allografts from unrelated donors have an increased incidence of primary graft failure but a similar overall transplant outcome. Blood 1999; 94: 2236–2246.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Andre-Schmutz I, Le Deist F, Hacein-Bey-Abina S et al. Immune reconstitution without graft-versus-host disease after haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a phase 1/2 study. Lancet 2002; 360: 130–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Guinan EC, Boussiotis VA, Neuberg D et al. Transplantation of anergic histoincompatible bone marrow allografts. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1704–1714.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Colette Raffoux for critical reading of the manuscript. We thank Isabelle Hirsch for help in the collection of data, and Edith Audran, Patricia Przednowed and Christine Deshayes for excellent technical assistance.

This work was supported by Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris. We also thank France Greffe de Moelle for help in selection of donors, and Association Française des Myopathies for continuous support of the Laboratory of Cellular Therapy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Caillat-Zucman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caillat-Zucman, S., Le Deist, F., Haddad, E. et al. Impact of HLA matching on outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with inherited diseases: a single-center comparative analysis of genoidentical, haploidentical or unrelated donors. Bone Marrow Transplant 33, 1089–1095 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704510

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704510

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links