Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Technical Report
  • Published:

Efficacy and safety of femoral vascular access for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection

Summary:

Central venous catheters are frequently used in leukapheresis to provide high flow rates. The most common locations are the subclavian or jugular vein, but insertion-related complications and inadequate flow are frequent problems. Experience using femoral venous access is limited, because this has been discouraged due to the high incidence of infectious or thromboembolic complications. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of 108 short-term femoral venous dialysis catheters used for the collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). All catheters were placed by a member of the dialysis unit, and they remained in situ for the days needed to reach the target number of CD34+cells. No prophylactic antibiotic or antithrombotic therapy was used. A total of 232 apheresis sessions was performed. The longest duration a catheter remained in situ was 5 days. Most of the patients finished the collection in one or two apheresis sessions. There were no thrombotic or infectious complications, and insertion-related complications or mechanical problems were minimal. Apheresis results were similar to those reported using subclavian or jugular venous access. The short-term use of femoral venous dialysis catheters appears safe and effective for PBSC collection, simplifying the procedure, improving patient comfort, and reducing cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smolowicz AC, Villman K, Tidefelt U . Large-volume apheresis for the harvest of peripheral blood progenitor cells for autologous transplantation. Transfusion 1997; 37: 188–192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson L . Central venous catheters for apheresis access. J Clin Apheresis 1992; 7: 154–157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Johansson E, Hansson M, Sollén Nilsson A, Engervall P . Vascular access devices used during harvest of peripheral blood stem cells: high complication rate in patients with a long-term dialysis central catheter. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 24: 793–797.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alegre A, Requena MJ, Fernández-Villalta M et al. Quinton–Mahurkar catheter as short-term central venous access for PBSC collection: single-centre experience or 370 apheresis in 110 patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 18: 865–869.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hahn U et al. Large-bore central venous catheters for the collection of peripheral blood stem cells. J Clin Apheresis 1995; 10: 12–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Madero L et al. Non-tunnelled catheters for the collection and transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells in children. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 20: 53–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bander SJ, Schwab J . Central venous angioaccess for hemodialysis and its complications. Semin Dial 1992; 5: 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Olivier MJ . Acute dialysis catheters. Semin Dial 2001; 14: 432–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stenzel JP et al. Percutaneous femoral venous catheterization: a prospective study of complications. J Pediatr 1989; 114: 411–415.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Durbec O et al. A prospective evaluation of the use of femoral venous catheters in critically ill adults. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 1986–1989.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Trottier S, Veremakis C, O'Brien J, Auer AI . Femoral deep vein thrombosis associated with central venous catheterization: results from a prospective, randomised trial. Crit Care Med 1995; 23: 52–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F et al. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients. A randomised controlled trial. JAMA 2001; 286: 700–707.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Oliver MJ et al. Risk of bacteriemia from temporary hemodialysis catheters by site of insertion and duration of use: a prospective study. Kidney Int 2000; 58: 2543–2545.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lazarus HM, Creger RJ, Bloom AD, Shenk R . Percutaneous placement of femoral central venous catheter in patients undergoing transplantation of bone marrow. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 170: 403–406.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shariatmadar S, Noto TA . Femoral vascular access for large-volume collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells. J Clin Apheresis 1998; 13: 99–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Adorno G, Zinno F, Bruno A et al. Femoral catheters: safety and efficacy in peripheral blood stem cell collection. Int J Artif Organs 1999; 22: 710–712.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Moreiras-Plaza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moreiras-Plaza, M., Albo, C. & Ares, C. Efficacy and safety of femoral vascular access for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection. Bone Marrow Transplant 33, 347–350 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704357

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704357

Keywords

Search

Quick links