Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Progenitor Cell Mobilisation

Etoposide (VP-16) plus G-CSF mobilizes different dendritic cell subsets than does G-CSF alone

Summary:

Dendritic cells (DCs) are antigen-presenting cells that are critical to the generation of immunologic tumor responses. Myeloid DCs (DC1) express myeloid antigen CD11c; lymphoid DCs (DC2) express CD123+ and are CD11c. Analysis of DC subsets from peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) collected from normal donors mobilized with G-CSF shows a predominance of DC2 cells. Whether PBPCs mobilization by chemotherapy yields different subsets of DCs has not been studied. We analyzed DC subsets in apheresis products from 44 patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation from 6/00 to 5/01. Patients received either G-CSF alone (10 μg/kg per day, n=11) or etoposide (2 g/m2) plus G-CSF (n=33) for progenitor cell mobilization. The patients were apheresed for 2–10 days (median 3) to reach a minimum of 2.0×106 CD34+ cells/kg. Patients receiving G-CSF alone mobilized significantly more total DC2s than did those receiving etoposide plus G-CSF (median 6.2×106/kg vs 2.9×106/kg, P=0.001). The DC2/DC1 ratio was also significantly different in the two groups, with the G-CSF group having a higher ratio (median 1.2 vs 0.4, P<0.001). We conclude that the combination of chemotherapy plus G-CSF yields different mobilized dendritic cell subsets than does G-CSF alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thomas R, Lipsky PE . Human peripheral blood dendritic cell subsets: isolation and characterization of precursor and mature antigen-presenting cells. J Immunol 1994; 153: 4016–4028.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liso A, Stockerl-Goldstein KE, Aufferman-Gretzinger S et al. Idiotype vaccination using dendritic cells after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2000; 6: 621–627.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Small EJ, Fratesi P, Deese DM et al. Immunotherapy of hormone-refractory prostate cancer with antigen loaded dendritic cells. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 3894–3903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Morse MA, Nair S, Fernandez-Casal M et al. Preoperative mobilization of circulating dendritic cells by Flt 3 ligand administration to patients with metastatic colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 3883–3893.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Waller E, Rosenthal H, Jones T et al. Larger numbers of CD4bright dendritic cells in donor bone marrow are associated with increased relapse after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood 2001; 97: 2948–2956.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Willmann K, Olweus J . Application note: Peripheral blood dendritic cells revealed by flow cytometry. BDBiosciences, San Jose, CA 23-3580-01, September 2000, www.bdbiosciences.com.

  7. Arpinati M, Green C, Heimfeld S et al. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor mobilizes T-helper 2-inducing dendritic cells. Blood 2000; 95: 2484–2490.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Morse MA, Vredenburgh J, Lyerly HK . A comparative study of the generation of dendritic cells from mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells of patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. J Hematother Stem Cell Res 1999; 8: 577–584.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lebsack ME, Maraskovsky E, Roux E et al. Increased circulating dendritic cells in healthy human volunteers following administration of Flt3 ligand alone or in combination with GM-CSF or G-CSF. Blood 1998; 92 (Suppl 1): 5079.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lonial S, Rosenthal H, Feinstein B et al. A randomized study of G-CSF vs the combination of G-CSF/GM-CSF on mobilization of dendritic cells in peripheral stem cell grafts. Blood 2000; 96 (Suppl. 1): 518a.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bolwell, B., Sobecks, R., Pohlman, B. et al. Etoposide (VP-16) plus G-CSF mobilizes different dendritic cell subsets than does G-CSF alone. Bone Marrow Transplant 31, 95–98 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703791

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703791

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links