Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Cytotoxic Agents

Synergistic cytotoxicity of buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) and intensive melphalan (L-PAM) for neuroblastoma cell lines established at relapse after myeloablative therapy

Abstract

Patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (NB) initially respond to aggressive, alkylator-based therapy only to die from recurrent disease that is refractory to chemotherapy, including alkylating agents. We examined the ability of buthionine sulfoximine (BSO)-mediated glutathione (GSH) depletion to modulate melphalan (L-PAM) resistance in five NB cell lines established after progressive disease following myeloablative therapy (high-dose melphalan, carboplatin, etoposide and total body irradiation) supported by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT), and in 15 NB cell lines established at diagnosis or after non-myeloablative therapy (pre-AHSCT). Four of five post-AHSCT NB cell lines and 10 of 15 pre-AHSCT NB cell lines were sensitive to single agent BSO (LC90 <300 μM BSO), while two of five post-AHSCT lines and one of 15 pre-AHSCT lines showed high-level resistance to L-PAM (LC90>30 μM). Fixed ratio analysis demonstrated BSO/L-PAM synergy (combination index <1) for all five post-AHSCT and for all 15 pre-AHSCT cell lines tested. Multi-log cytotoxicity (often exceeding four logs of cell kill) was observed in post-AHSCT L-PAM-resistant cell lines (including p53 non-functional lines) only when clinically achievable concentrations of BSO were combined with myeloablative concentrations of L-PAM. We conclude that most neuroblastoma cell lines, including post-AHSCT NB cell lines that are highly resistant to myeloablative levels of L-PAM and lack p53 function, are sensitive to clinically achievable concentrations of L-PAM and BSO. However, some L-PAM-resistant NB cell lines (especially those lacking p53 function) require dose escalation of L-PAM to myeloablative concentrations in order to demonstrate significant synergistic cytotoxicity. Thus, optimal clinical application of BSO/L-PAM may require AHSCT.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reynolds CP, Seeger RC . Neuroblastoma In: Haskell CM (ed.) Cancer Treatment WB Saunders: Philadelphia 2000 pp 1214 1236

    Google Scholar 

  2. Seeger RC, Brodeur GM, Sather H et al. Association of multiple copies of the N-myc oncogene with rapid progression of neuroblastomas New Engl J Med 1985 313: 1111 1116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haase GM, Perez C, Atkinson JB . Current aspects of biology, risk assessment, and treatment of neuroblastoma Semin Surg Oncol 1999 16: 91 104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Castleberry RP . Biology and treatment of neuroblastoma Pediatr Clin North Am 1997 4: 919 937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. DuBois SG, Kalika Y, Lukens JN et al. Metastatic sites in stage IV and IVS neuroblastoma correlate with age, tumor biology, and survival J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1999 21: 181 189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Seeger RC, Reynolds CP, Gallego R et al. Quantitative tumor cell content of bone marrow and blood as a predictor of outcome in stage IV neuroblastoma: a Children's Cancer Group Study J Clin Oncol 2000 18: 4067 4076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Matthay KK, Villablanca JG, Seeger RC et al. Treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma with intensive chemotherapy, radiotherapy, autologous bone marrow transplantation, and 13-cis-retinoic acid. Children's Cancer Group New Engl J Med 1999 341: 1165 1173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Keshelava N, Zuo JJ, Chen P et al. Loss of p53 function confers high-level multi-drug resistance in neuroblastoma cell lines Cancer Res 2001 61: 6185 6193

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tew KD, Houghton PJ, Houghton JA . Preclinical and clinical modulation of anticancer drugs In Preclinical and Clinical Modulation of Anticancer Drugs CRC Press: Boca Raton 1993 pp 13 17

    Google Scholar 

  10. Biaglow JE, Varnes ME, Clark EP et al. The role of thiols in cellular response to radiation and drugs Radiat Res 1983 95: 437 455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meister A, Anderson ME . Glutathione Annu Rev Biochem 1983 52: 711 760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Russo A, DeGraff W, Friedman N et al. Selective modulation of glutathione levels in human normal versus tumor cells and subsequent differential response to chemotherapy drugs Cancer Res 1986 46: 2845 2848

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Green JA, Vistica DT, Young RC et al. Potentiation of melphalan cytotoxicity in human ovarian cancer cell lines by glutathione depletion Cancer Res 1984 44: 5427 5431

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hamilton TC, Winker MA, Louie KG et al. Augmentation of adriamycin, melphalan, and cisplatin cytotoxicity in drug-resistant and -sensitive human ovarian carcinoma cell lines by buthionine sulfoximine mediated glutathione depletion Biochem Pharmacol 1985 34: 2583 2586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Siemann DW, Beyers KL . In vivo therapeutic potential of combination thiol depletion and alkylating chemotherapy Br J Cancer 1993 68: 1071 1079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson CP, Tsai JM, Chan WW et al. Buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) is cytotoxic and enhances the activity of melphalan for human neuroblastoma cell lines Eur J Cancer 1997 33: 2016 2019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson CP, Tsai JM, Meek WE et al. Depletion of glutathione (GSH) by buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) is cytotoxic for human neuroblastoma cell lines via apoptosis Exp Cell Res 1999 246: 183 192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bailey HH, Mulcahy RT, Tutsch KD et al. Phase I clinical trial of intravenous L-buthionine sulfoximine and melphalan: an attempt at modulation of glutathione J Clin Oncol 1994 12: 194 205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bailey HH, Ripple G, Tutsch KD et al. Phase I study of continuous-infusion L-S,R-buthionine sulfoximine with intravenous melphalan J Natl Cancer Inst 1997 89: 1789 1796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Anderson CP, Seeger RC, Matthay KK et al. Pilot study of buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) and melphalan (L-PAM) in children with recurrent neuroblastoma Proc Amer Soc Clin Oncol 1998 17: 531a

    Google Scholar 

  21. O'Dwyer PJ, Hamilton TC, Young RC et al. Depletion of glutathione in normal and malignant human cells in vivo by buthionine sulfoximine: clinical and biochemical results (see comments) J Natl Cancer Inst 1992 84: 264 267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yao K, Godwin AK, Ozols RF et al. Variable baseline gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase messenger RNA expression in peripheral mononuclear cells of cancer patients, and its induction by buthionine sulfoximine treatment Cancer Res 1993 53: 3662 3666

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Keshelava N, Groshen S, Reynolds CP . Cross-resistance of topoisomerase I and II inhibitors in neuroblastoma cell lines Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2000 45: 1 8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Reynolds CP, Tomayko MM, Donner L et al. Biological classification of cell lines derived from human extra-cranial neural tumors Prog Clin Biol Res 1988 271: 291 306

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson CP, Seeger RC, Satake N et al. Buthionine sulfoximine and myeloablative concentrations of melphalan overcome resistance in melphalan-resistant neuroblastoma cell line J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2001 23: 500 505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Proffitt RT, Tran JV, Reynolds CP . A fluorescence digital image microscopy system for quantifying relative cell numbers in tissue culture plates Cytometry 1996 24: 204 213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Frgala T, Reynolds CP . Cytotoxic activity of deferoxamine and hydroxyurea for neuroblastoma in vitro Proc Amer Assoc Canc Res 1995 36: 303

    Google Scholar 

  28. Keshelava N, Yang YJ, Tsai JM et al. Drug resistance patterns in human neuroblastoma cell lines correlates with clinical therapy Eur J Cancer 1997 33: 2002 2006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Keshelava N, Seeger RC, Groshen S et al. Drug resistance patterns of human neuroblastoma cell lines derived from patients at different phases of therapy Cancer Res 1998 58: 5396 5405

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reynolds CP, Biedler JL, Spengler BA et al. Characterization of human neuroblastoma cell lines established before and after therapy J Natl Cancer Inst 1986 76: 375 387

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chou J, Chou T-C . Dose effect analysis with microcomputers. Dose Effect Analysis with Microcomputers Elsevier-Biosoft: Cambridge, UK 1988

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chou T-C, Talalay P . Quantitative analysis of dose–effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors Adv Enzyme Regul 1984 22: 27 55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Chou TC, Motzer RJ, Tong Y et al. Computerized quantitation of synergism and antagonism of taxol, topotecan, and cisplatin against human teratocarcinoma cell growth: a rational approach to clinical protocol design J Natl Cancer Inst 1994 86: 1517 1524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chou TC, Talaly P . A simple generalized equation for the analysis of multiple inhibitions of Michaelis–Menten kinetic systems J Biol Chem 1977 252: 6438 6442

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chou T-C, Rideout D, Chou J et al. Relationships between inhibition constants and fractional inhibitions in enzyme-catalyzed reactions with different numbers of reactants, different reaction mechanisms, and different types of mechanisms of inhibition Mol Pharmacol 1974 10: 235 247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Vandeputte C, Guizon I, Genestie-Denis I et al. A microtiter plate assay for total glutathione and glutathione disulfide contents in cultured/isolated cells: performance study of a new miniaturized protocol Cell Bio Toxicology 1994 10: 415 421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Anderson CP, Seeger RC, Matthay KK et al. Buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) and melphalan (L-Pam) is active against recurrent neuroblastoma Med Pediatr Oncol 1999 33: 158

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lazarus HM, Gray R, Ciobanu N et al. Phase I trial of high-dose melphalan, high-dose etoposide and autologous bone marrow re-infusion in solid tumors: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study Bone Marrow Transplant 1994 14: 443 448

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Pinguet F, Martel P, Fabbro M et al. Pharmacokinetics of high-dose intravenous melphalan in patients undergoing peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor-cell transplantation Anticancer Res 1997 17: 605 611

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hersh MR, Ludden TM, Kuhn JG et al. Pharmacokinetics of high dose melphalan Invest New Drugs 1983 1: 331 334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported in part by the Neil Bogart Memorial Laboratories of the TJ Martell Foundation for Leukemia, Cancer, and AIDS Research, by National Cancer Institute Grant CA82830, by a National Research Service Award 2 T32 CA 09659 for training in basic research in oncology, and by NIH GCRC Grant 3MO1ROO43-38.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to CP Reynolds.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, C., Reynolds, C. Synergistic cytotoxicity of buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) and intensive melphalan (L-PAM) for neuroblastoma cell lines established at relapse after myeloablative therapy. Bone Marrow Transplant 30, 135–140 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703605

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703605

Keywords

Search

Quick links