Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Infections Post Transplant

Infectious complications in breast cancer patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: a single center retrospective analysis towards outpatient strategy

Abstract

Infectious complications were retrospectively analyzed in 129 transplants, performed in 90 patients, to identify characteristics that qualify breast cancer patients for outpatient-based PBSCT. Thirty-one cases (24%) did not develop fever. Of the remaining 98 cases, 84.7% developed fever during severe neutropenia. On univariate analysis, disease stages II–III, first PBSCT, mucositis grades II–IV and the use of two alkylators were associated with a higher risk of fever development. The latter two factors also affected fever occurrence on multivariate analysis. A longer median time to fever onset was observed in patients conditioned with single as compared to double alkylating agent-containing regimens (respectively 8th vs 6th day, P < 0.00001). As compared with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), high risk breast cancer showed a 2.3-fold increased risk of developing early fever during neutropenia (CI 2.3–3.8), remaining the only variable still significant on multivariate analysis (P = 0.0039). Combination antibiotic therapy was equivalent to single agent therapy. Patients suffering from microbiologically documented fever were at higher risk of undergoing second-line antibiotic therapy. In conclusion, MBC patients treated with a conditioning regimen containing only one alkylating agent and adequate prophylaxis for mucositis may qualify for outpatient-based PBSCT on the basis of a lower risk of infection. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2001) 28, 883–888.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lazarus HM . Hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in breast cancer: current status and future directions Cancer Invest 1998 16: 1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Antman KH, Rowlings PA, Vaughan WP et al. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support for breast cancer in North America J Clin Oncol 1997 15: 1870–1879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morabito F, Palazzo S, Iacopino P per il Gruppo Oncologico Calabrese Multidisciplinare (GOCAM) . Trapianto di cellule staminali periferiche nel carcinoma della mammella – (Ia parte) carcinoma metastatico Oncol Hematol Rev 1999 1: 35–43

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morabito F, Palazzo S, Iacopino P per il Gruppo Oncologico Calabrese Multidisciplinare (GOCAM) . Trapianto di cellule staminali periferiche nel carcinoma della mammella – (IIa parte) pazienti ad alto rischio di ricaduta Oncol Hematol Rev 1999 2: 25–34

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stadtmauer EA, O'Neill A, Goldstein LJ et al. Conventional-dose chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer New Engl J Med 2000 342: 1069–1076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Iacopino P, Palazzo S, Patrone F . High-dose chemotherapy plus hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for metastatic breast cancer New Engl J Med 2000 343: 439 (letter)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meyers JD . Infection of bone marrow transplant recipient Am J Med 1986 81: 27–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sable CA, Donowitz GR . Infections in bone marrow transplant recipients Clin Infect Dis 1994 18: 273–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmitz N, Linch D, Dreger P et al. Randomised trial of filgrastim-mobilised peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation versus autologous bone-marrow transplantation inlymphoma patients Lancet 1996 347: 353–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hartmann O, Le Corroller AG, Blaise D et al. Peripheral blood stem cell and bone marrow transplantation for solid tumors and lymphomas: hematologic recovery and costs Ann Intern Med 1997 126: 600–607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Engels EA, Lau J, Barza M . Efficacy of quinolone prophylaxis in neutropenic cancer patients: a meta-analysis J Clin Oncol 1998 16: 1179–1187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Slavin MA, Osborne B, Adams R et al. Efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis for fungal infections after bone marrow transplantation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study J Infect Dis 1995 171: 1545–1552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rizzo J, Vogelsang GB, Krumm S et al. Outpatient-based bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies: cost saving or cost shifting? J Clin Oncol 1999 9: 2811–2818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gianni AM, Siena S, Bregni M et al. Efficacy, toxicity and applicability of high dose sequential chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment in operable breast cancer with 10 or more involved axillary nodes: five-year results J Clin Oncol 1997 15: 2312–2321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Patrone F, Ballestrero A, Riccardi A et al. Interim results of GROCTA 8 adjuvant trial in breast cancer patients with ten or more involved nodes Bone Marrow Transplant 2000 267: (Suppl. 1): (Abstr. 11)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Offidani M, Corvatta L, Olivieri A et al. Infectious complications after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation followed by G-CSF Bone Marrow Transplant 1999 24: 1079–1087

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Seropian S, Nadkarni R, Jillella AP et al. Neutropenic infections in 100 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or Hodgkin's disease treated with high-dose BEAM chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplant: outpatient treatment is a viable option Bone Marrow Transplant 1999 23: 599–605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gluck S, Germond C, Lopez P et al. A phase I trial of high-dose paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide and mitoxantrone with autologous blood stem cell support for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer Eur J Cancer 1998 34: 1008–1014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Prince HM, Millward MJ, Rischin D et al. Repetitive high-dose therapy with ifosfamide, thiotepa and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell and filgrastim support for metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer: results of a phase I study Ann Oncol 1999 10: 479–481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Greinix HT, Linkesch W, Seifert M et al. Paclitaxel-containing high-dose chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients Acta Oncol 2000 39: 47–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rossetti A, Azzarà M, Castiglione S et al. Low incidence of mucositis using a new compound (magnesium chloride) for mucositis prevention after allogeneic BMT and autologous PBSCT Bone Marrow Transplant 1997 19: (Suppl. 1) (Abstr. 22)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Karthaus M, Rosenthal C, Ganser A . Prophylaxis and treatment of chemo- and radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis – are there new strategies? Bone Marrow Transplant 1999 24: 1095–1108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Capelli D, Santini G, De Souza C et al. Amifostine can reduce mucosal damage after high-dose melphalan conditioning for peripheral blood progenitor cell autotransplant: a retrospective study Br J Haematol 2000 110: 300–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rintala E . Incidence and clinical significance of positive blood cultures in febrile episodes of patients with hematological malignancies Scand J Infect Dis 1994 26: 77–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Serody JS, Berrey MM, Albritton K et al. Utility of obtaining blood cultures in febrile neutropenic patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation Bone Marrow Transplant 2000 26: 533–538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kurthaus M, Wolf HH, Kampfe D et al. Ceftriaxone monotherapy in the treatment of low-risk febrile neutropenia Chemotherapy 1998 44: 343–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morabito, F., Irrera, G., Oliva, E. et al. Infectious complications in breast cancer patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: a single center retrospective analysis towards outpatient strategy. Bone Marrow Transplant 28, 883–888 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703246

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703246

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links