Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Autografting

A comparison of inpatient and outpatient ASCT

Abstract

Outpatient high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been shown to be feasible in terms of physical morbidity and mortality outcomes, but few data exist on the psychosocial impact of delivering such aggressive therapy in this manner. The purpose of this observational study was to compare effects of inpatient (n = 20) and outpatient (n = 21) modes of care on physical status, psychological well-being, quality of life, personal finances and caregiver burden. Most patients were treated according to their preference for inpatient or outpatient care. Those choosing outpatient care were screened for eligibility according to established criteria for ambulatory management. Measures were taken at baseline, then at days 4–6, 12–16 and 30 post ASCT. Results showed that overall, the psychological, physical, social and financial outcomes of the outpatient ASCT group were comparable, to or better than inpatients. Factors that seem to be important for successful outpatient management are previous experience with cancer treatment, a satisfying quality of life, physical well-being, patient's preference for a particular mode of care and physical proximity to the treatment centre. The study results suggest that outpatient ASCT is an efficient, effective and acceptable form of care for motivated patients and caregivers who have the physical and psychological capability and desire to receive cancer treatment in this manner. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 26, 389–395.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldman JM, Schmitz N, Niethammer D et al. Allogeneic and autologous transplantation for haematological diseases, solid tumors, and immune disorders: current practice in Europe in 1998 Bone Marrow Transplant 1998 21: 1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Peters WP, Ross M, Vredenburgh JJ et al. The use of intensive clinic support to permit outpatient autologous bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer Semin Oncol 1994 12: (Suppl.7) 25–31

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meisenbery B, Miller W, McMilland R, Piro L . Near total outpatient transplant – accumulated experience in 125 transplants with a financial analysis on a subset of patients Blood 1995 86: (Suppl) 838

  4. Gluck S, Rochers CD . High-dose chemotherapy followed by blood cell transplantation: a safe and effective outpatient approach Bone Marrow Transplant 1997 20: 431–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Scott I, Bearman FR, Appelbaum C et al. Regimen-related toxicity in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation J Clin Oncol 1988 6: 1562–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowling A . Measuring Health: A Review of Quality of Life Measurements Scales Open University Press: Milton Keynes 1991

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G et al. The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure J Clin Oncol 1993 11: 570–579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson SC, Sobolew-Shubin A, Galbraith ME et al. Maintaining perceptions of control: Finding perceived control in low-control circumstances J Personality Soc Psych 1993 64: 293–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Given CW, Given B, Stommel M et al. The Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) for caregivers to persons with chronic physical and mental impairments Res Nurs Health 1992 15: 271–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Devins GM, Orme CM . Centre for epidemiologic studies depression scale. In: DJ Keyser, RC Sweetland (eds) Test Critiques Compendium: Review of Major Tests from TestCritiques Series Westport Publishers: Kansas City 1995 pp144159

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lawrence CC, Giblert CJ, Peters WP . Evaluation of symptoms distress in a bone marrow transplantation outpatient environment Ann Pharmacother 1996 30: 941–945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McCorkle R, Shegda Yost L, Jepson C et al. A cancer experience: relationship of patient psychosocial responses tocare-giver burden over time Psycho-Oncology 1993 2: 21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was financially supported by the Gary Owen Memorial Fund, Calgary Regional Health Authority.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Summers, N., Dawe, U. & Stewart, D. A comparison of inpatient and outpatient ASCT. Bone Marrow Transplant 26, 389–395 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1702534

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1702534

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links