Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Infections Post Transplant

Fluconazole vs low-dose amphotericin B for the prevention of fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation: a study of the North American Marrow Transplant Group

Abstract

systemic fungal infections are a major problem in bone marrow transplant recipients who have prolonged neutropenia or who receive high-dose corticosteroids. prophylaxis with fluconazole or low-dose amphotericin b reduces, but does not eliminate these infections. to determine which prophylactic agent is better, we performed a prospective randomized study. patients undergoing allogeneic (related or unrelated) or autologous marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation were randomized to receive fluconazole (400 mg/day p.o. or i.v.) or amphotericin b (0.2 mg/kg/day i.v.) beginning 1 day prior to stem cell transplantation and continuing until recovery of neutrophils to >500/μl. patients were removed from their study drug for drug-associated toxicity, invasive fungal infection or suspected fungal infection (defined as the presence of fever >38°C without positive culture while on broad-spectrum anti-bacterial antibiotics). Proven or suspected fungal infections were treated with high-dose amphotericin B (0.5–0.7 mg/kg/day). Patients were randomized at each institution and stratified for the type of transplant. The primary end-point of the study was prevention of documented fungal infection; secondary endpoints included fungal colonization, drug toxicity, duration of hospitalization, duration of fever, duration of neutropenia, duration and total dose of high-dose amphotericin B and overall survival to hospital discharge. From July 1992 to October 1994, a total of 355 patients entered into the trial with 159 patients randomized to amphotericin B and 196 to Fluconazole. Patient groups were comparable for diagnosis, age, sex, prior antibiotic or antifungal therapy, use of corticosteroids prior to transplantation and total duration of neutropenia. Amphotericin B was significantly more toxic than Fluconazole especially in related allogeneic transplantation where 19% of patients developed toxicity vs 0% of Fluconazole recipients (p < 0.05). approximately 44% of all patients were removed from prophylaxis for presumed fungal infection. proven fungal infections occurred in 4.1% and 7.5% of fluconazole and amphotericin-treated patients, respectively. proven fungal infections occurred in 9.1% and 14.3% of related allogeneic marrow recipients receiving fluconazole or amphotericin b, respectively, and 2.1% and 5.6% of autologous marrow recipients receiving fluconazole or amphotericin b, respectively (P > 0.05). In this prospective trial, low-dose amphotericin B prophylaxis was as effective as Fluconazole prophylaxis, but Fluconazole was significantly better tolerated. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25 , 853–859.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khardori N, Bodey, GP . Infections in hematologic malignancies Hematology 1991 14: 363–424

    Google Scholar 

  2. Verfaillie C, Weisdorf D, Haake R et al. Candida infections in bone marrow transplant recipients Bone Marrow Transplant 1991 8: 177–184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Klastersky J . Febrile neutropenia Curr Opin Oncol 1993 5: 625–632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Koll BS, Brown AE . Changing patterns of infections in the immunocompromised patient with cancer Hematol/Oncol Clin North Am 1993 7: 753–769

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heurlin N, Bergstrom SE, Winiarski J et al. Fungal pneumonia: the predominant lung infection causing death in children undergoing bone marrow transplantation Acta Paediatr 1996 85: 168–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gamis AS, Gudnason T, Giebink GS, Ramsay NKC . Disseminated infection with fusarium in recipients of bone marrow transplants Rev Infect Dis 1991 13: 1077–1088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Uderzo C, Angelo PD, Rizzari C et al. Central venous catheter-related complications after bone marrow transplantation in children with hematological malignancies Bone Marrow Transplant 1991 9: 113–117

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guiot HF, Fibbe WE, van't Wout JW . Risk factors for fungal infection in patients with malignant hematologic disorders: implications for empirical therapy and prophylaxis Clin Infect Dis 1994 18: 525–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodman JL, Winston DJ, Greenfield RA et al. A controlled trial of fluconazole to prevent fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation New Engl J Med 1992 326: 845–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Winston DJ, Chandrasekar PH, Lazarus HM et al. Fluconazole prophylaxis of fungal infections in patients with acute leukemia. Results of a randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial Ann Intern Med 1993 118: 495–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Slavin MA, Osborne B, Adams R et al. Efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis for fungal infections after marrow transplantation – a prospective, randomized, double-blind study J Infect Dis 1995 171: 1545–1552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kruger W, Sobottka I, Stockschlader M et al. Fatal outcome of disseminated candidosis after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation under treatment with liposomal and conventional amphotericin-B. A report of 4 cases with determination of the Mic values Scand J Infect Dis 1996 28: 313–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jehu V . Managing fungal and viral infections in the immunocompromised host Rec Res Cancer Res 1988 108: 61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Winston DJ . Prophylaxis and treatment of infection in the bone marrow transplant recipient Curr Clin Topics Infect Dis 1993 13: 293–321

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Walsh TJ, Finberg RW, Arndt C et al. Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group New Engl J Med 1999 340: 764–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pasic S, Flannagan L, Cant AJ . Liposomal amphotericin (AmBisome) is safe in bone marrow transplantation for primary immunodeficiency Bone Marrow Transplant 1997 19: 1229–1232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chopra R, Fielding A, Goldstone AH . Successful treatment of fungal infections in neutropenic patients with liposomal amphotericin (AmBisome) – a report on 40 cases from a single centre Leuk Lymphoma 1992 7: (Suppl1) 73–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kruger W, Stockschlader M, Russmann B et al. Experience with liposomal Amphotericin-B in 60 patients undergoing high-dose therapy and bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation Br J Haematol 1995 91: 684–690

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kruger W, Stockschlader M, Sobottka I et al. Antimycotic therapy with liposomal amphotericin-B for patients undergoing bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation Leuk Lymphoma 1997 24: 491–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fluconazole Med Lett 1990 32: 50–52

  21. Gotzsche PC, Johansen HK . Meta-analysis of prophylactic or empirical antifungal treatment vs placebo or no treatment in patients with cancer complicated by neutropenia Br Med J 1997 314: 1238–1244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ehninger G, Schuler HK, Sarnow E . Fluconazole in the prophylaxis of fungal infection after bone marrow transplantation Mycoses 1996 39: 259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. O'Donnell MR, Schmidt GM, Tegtmeier BR et al. Prediction of systemic fungal infection in allogeneic marrow recipients: impact of amphotericin prophylaxis in high-risk patients J Clin Oncol 1994 12: 827–834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Powles RL, Milliken S . The prophylaxis of fungal infections J Antimicrob Chemother 1991 28: (Suppl. A) 97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Quabeck K, Muller KD, Beelen DW et al. Prophylaxis and treatment of fungal infections with fluconazole in bone marrow transplant patients Mycoses 1992 35: 221–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tollemar J, Ringden O, Andersson S et al. Randomized double-blind study of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in bone marrow transplant recipients Bone Marrow Transplant 1993 12: 577–582

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ringden O, Andstrom EE, Remberger M et al. Prophylaxis and therapy using liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) for invasive fungal infections in children undergoing organ or allogeneic bone-marrow transplantation Pediatr Transplant 1997 1: 124–129

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Perfect JR, Klotman ME, Gilbert CC et al. Prophylactic intravenous Amphotericin B in neutropenic autologous bone marrow transplant recipients J Infect Dis 1992 165: 891–897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schwartz S, Behre G, Heinemann V et al. Aerosolized amphotericin B inhalations as prophylaxis of invasive aspergillus infections during prolonged neutropenia: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial Blood 1999 93: 3654–3661

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hertenstein B, Kern WV, Schmeiser T et al. Low incidence of invasive fungal infections after bone marrow transplantation in patients receiving amphotericin B inhalations during neutropenia Ann Hematol 1994 68: 21–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kelsey SM, Goldman JM, McCann S et al. Liposomal amphotericin (AmBisome) in the prophylaxis of fungal infections in neutropenic patients: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study Bone Marrow Transplant 1999 23: 163–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wingard JR, Merz WG, Rinaldi MG et al. Increase in Candida krusei infection among patients with bone marrow transplantation and neutropenia treated prophylactically with fluconazole New Engl J Med 1991 325: 1274–1277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bearman SI, Appelbaum FR, Buckner CD et al. Regimen-related toxicity in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation J Clin Oncol 1988 6: 1562–1568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. De Laurenzi A, Matteocci A, Lanti A et al. Amphotericin B prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients: a single center experience from 1980 to 1995 Infection 1996 24: 361–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chandrasekar PH, Gatny CM . The effect of fluconazole prophylaxis on fungal colonization in neutropenic cancer patients. Bone Marrow Transplantation Team J Antimicrob Chemother 1994 33: 309–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rousey SR, Russler S, Gottlieb M, Ash RC . Low-dose amphotericin B prophylaxis against invasive aspergillus infections in allogeneic marrow transplantation Am J Med 1991 91: 484–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Chandrasekar PH, Gatny CM . Effect of fluconazole prophylaxis on fever and use of amphotericin in neutropenic cancer patients. Bone Marrow Transplantation Team Chemotherapy 1994 40: 136–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolff, S., Fay, J., Stevens, D. et al. Fluconazole vs low-dose amphotericin B for the prevention of fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation: a study of the North American Marrow Transplant Group. Bone Marrow Transplant 25, 853–859 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1702233

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1702233

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links