Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Progenitor Cell Mobilisation

Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells with paclitaxel (taxol) as a single chemotheraupetic agent, associated with rhG-CSF

Abstract

We assessed the mobilization capacity of taxol with rhG-CSF, both as a single chemotherapeutic agent and in the presence of cyclophosphamide (CY), and compared the effect with yields achieved when mobilization was performed solely with rhG-CSF. Fifteen patients with breast cancer received taxol 170 mg/m2 (continuous infusion, day 1) and rhG-CSF (8 μg/kg/day, from day 2 until the end of apheresis) (T-G group), while seven breast cancer patients were additionally treated with CY (4 g/m2) on day 2, followed by rhG-CSF starting at similar doses on day 3 (T-CY-G group). The PBSC collections after taxol with/without CY were compared with those of 30 breast cancer patients who had received rhG-CSF (8 μg/kg/day) for mobilization. No differences were found in the characteristics of patients included in any of the three mobilization groups. The median yield of CD34+ cells from all patients included in taxol containing schedules was 9 × 106/kg (range 2–26) collected with a median of one apheresis procedure (range 1–4). Leukaphereses began earlier in the T-G group (median day 8, range 7–10) than in the T-CY-G group (median day 13, range 11–17). In most patients (20 out of 22) who received taxol containing regimens, more than 2.5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, a threshold considered to be sufficient for hematopoietic reconstitution, were collected with a single apheresis. Those patients in the T-G group experienced less neutropenic and thrombocytopenic days, with all neutropenic fever episodes developing in patients treated with the T-CY-G schedule (43%). When considering priming with rhG-CSF alone in our historical cohort of 30 breast cancer patients, a significant detrimental effect was observed in comparison with taxol mobilizing schedules, in the number of aphereses performed, in the total yield CD34+cells and in the number of patients who achieved the target dose of 2.5 × 106/kg CD34+ cells within the first collection procedure. We conclude that taxol containing schedules are effective in mobilizing PBSC and facilitate the collection of high yields of CD34+ cells (usually more than 5 × 106/kg recipient body weight) with a reduced number of apheresis procedures. Taxol, as a single agent with rhG-CSF, exhibits less hematological toxicity than the combination chemotherapy mobilization regimen including CY. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 231–235.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bensinger W, Appelbaum F, Rowley S et al. Factors that influence collection and engraftment of autologous peripheral blood stem cells J Clin Oncol 1995 13: 2547–2555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eisenhauer EA, Vermorken JB . The taxoids. Comparative clinical pharmacology and therapeutic potential Drugs 1998 55: 5–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Demirer T, Rowley S, Buckner D et al. Peripheral blood stem cell collection after paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with breast and ovarian cancer J Clin Oncol 1995 13: 1714–1719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shea TC . Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy Semin Oncol 1997 24: (Suppl.2) 105–107

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weaver CH, Schwartzberg LS, Birch R et al. Collection of peripheral blood stem cells following administration of paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, and filgrastim in patients with breast and ovarian cancer Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 1997 3: 83–90

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pedrazzoli P, Perotti C, Da Prada GA et al. Collection of circulating progenitor cells after epirubicin, paclitaxel and filgrastim in patients with metastatic breast cancer Br J Cancer 1997 75: 1368–1372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bengala C, Pazzagli Y, Tibaldi C et al. Mobilization, collection, and characterisation of peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitors after chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor administered to patients with metastatic breast carcinoma Cancer 1998 85: 867–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Demirer T, Buckner CD, Storer B et al. Effect of different chemotherapy regimens on peripheral-blood stem cell collection in patients with breast cancer receiving granulocyte colony stimulating factor J Clin Oncol 1997 15: 684–690

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. De Arriba F, Lozano ML, Ortuño F et al. Prospective randomised study comparing the efficacy of bioequivalent doses of glycosylated and nonglycosylated rhG-CSF for mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells Br J Haematol 1997 96: 418–420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sutherland DR, Anania S, Nayar R et al. Accurate enumeration of CD34+ cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood of patients after chemotherapy and GM-CSF Exp Haematol 1993 21: 1163–1166

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burtness BA, Psyrri A, Rose M et al. A phase I study of paclitaxel for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells Bone Marrow Transplant 1999 23: 311–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Burtness B, Henderson-Bakas M, Di Andrea E . Single agent paclitaxel mobilized CD34+ cells effectively Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1995 14: 108 (Abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rajagopal C, Areman E, Verman U et al. Paclitaxel as a single agent is superior to cyclophosphamide for mobilizing CD34+ cell transplantation Blood 1995 86: (Suppl.1) 405a

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ketterer N, Salles G, Raba M et al. High CD34+ counts decrease hematologic toxicity of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation Blood 1998 9: 3148–3155

    Google Scholar 

  15. Olivieri A, Offidani M, Montarani M et al. Factors affecting hematopietic recovery after high dose therapy and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: a single center experience Haematologica 1998 83: 329–337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weaver CH, Potz J, Redmond J et al. Engraftment and outcomes of patients receiving myeloablative therapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cells with a low CD34+ cell content Bone Marrow Transplant 1997 19: 1103–1110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwella N, Beyer I, Schwaner I et al. Impact of preleukapheresis cell counts on collection results and correlation of progenitor-cell dose with engraftment after high-dose chemotherapy in patients with germ cell cancer J Clin Oncol 1996 14: 1114–1121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from ‘Fundacion Hefame’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gómez-Espuch, J., Moraleda, J., Ortuño, F. et al. Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells with paclitaxel (taxol) as a single chemotheraupetic agent, associated with rhG-CSF. Bone Marrow Transplant 25, 231–235 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1702130

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1702130

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links