Original Article

Impact of cyclosporine and methylprednisolone dose used for prophylaxis and therapy of graft-versus-host disease on survival and relapse after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

  • Bone Marrow Transplantation volume 23, pages 145150 (1999)
  • doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1701529
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published:

Abstract

In order to determine whether doses of cyclosporine and methylprednisolone used for prophylaxis and therapy of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) have any influence on relapse and survival following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), we studied 176 adult patients with hematologic malignancies, who underwent a first allogeneic transplant from an HLA-identical sibling donor. Two methods of management of acute GVHD used in two different centers were compared: group I included 62 patients who had ‘standard’ management of GVHD including prophylaxis with 1–3 mg/kg/day of cyclosporine and treatment with 2 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone when acute GVHD developed; group II included 114 patients who received ‘intensive’ management of GVHD including prophylaxis with 5 mg/kg/day of cyclosporine and treatment with high-dose methylprednisolone (8–20 mg/kg/day for 3 days) at the onset of GVHD. The overall incidence of GVHD was the same in both groups. However, acute GVHD was more severe in group I than in group II (P < 0.0001), with consequently less resolution of gvhd after treatment in group i (61%) than in group ii (80%) (P = 0.06). Overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) did not differ between the two groups. However, actuarial risk of disease relapse was significantly higher in group II than in group I (36% vs 17%, P = 0.02). In a multivariate analysis taking into account known factors influencing GVHD and relapse, only type of GVHD management and age were significantly predictive for the occurrence of GVHD, while only type of GVHD management and pathology other than chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) were predictive for relapse. This study demonstrates that intensity of GVHD prophylaxis and therapy can influence the graft-versus-leukemia effect by decreasing severity of GVHD but at the price of increasing relapse rate post transplant.

Author information

Author notes

    • E Archimbaud

    Deceased

Affiliations

  1. Unité de Greffe de Moëlle Osseuse, Service d’Hématologie, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France

    • M Michallet
    • , M-C Perrin
    • , A Belhabri
    • , JD Tigaud
    • , D Fière
    •  & E Archimbaud
  2. Unité de Greffe de Moëlle Osseuse, Service d’Hématologie, Hopital Michallon, Grenoble, France

    • L Molina
    • , F Nicolini
    •  & J-J Sotto
  3. Unité de Greffe de Moëlle Osseuse, Service d’Hématologie, Hôpital Nord, Saint-Etienne, France

    • D Guyotat

Authors

  1. Search for M Michallet in:

  2. Search for M-C Perrin in:

  3. Search for A Belhabri in:

  4. Search for L Molina in:

  5. Search for F Nicolini in:

  6. Search for JD Tigaud in:

  7. Search for J-J Sotto in:

  8. Search for D Guyotat in:

  9. Search for D Fière in:

  10. Search for E Archimbaud in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Michallet.