Statistical Methods in Anthropology

Abstract

THERE has been a lively discussion, in Nature1 and elsewhere2, on the classification of recent fossil finds in South Africa. Prof. S. Zuckerman has rightly stressed the need for basing such decisions on statistical tests. But his findings have been at odds with those based on classical comparisons; so that anthropologists must now be in doubt whether their science has, indeed, anything to learn from statistics.

References

  1. 1

    Zuckerman, S., Nature, 165, 652; 166, 158, 953 (1950). Le Gros Clark, W. E., Nature, 165, 893; 166, 791 (1950).

  2. 2

    Le Gros Clark, W. E., Man, 51, 18 (1951). Zuckerman, S., Man, 51, 20 (1951).

  3. 3

    Ashton, E. H., and Zuckerman, S., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., B, 234, 471 and 485 (1950); Man, 51, 23 (1951).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BRONOWSKI, J., LONG, W. Statistical Methods in Anthropology. Nature 168, 794 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1038/168794a0

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.