Letter | Published:

So-called Non-adaptive or Neutral Characters in Evolution

Naturevolume 168page424 (1951) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

THE reaction that set in some thirty years ago against the facile assumption that all interspecific differences are adaptive was good but went too far. Several authors insisted that most specific and sub-specific differences were non-adaptive. More recently, Mayr1, while emphasizing the great importance of selection in speciation, considered that not all geographical variation is adaptive and, in particular, that most of the characters involved in polymorphism are completely neutral so far as survival value is concerned. Later2, he reversed this judgment on polymorphism.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Mayr, E., “Systematics and the Origin of Species” (Columbia, 1942).

  2. 2

    Mayr, E., and Stresemann, E., Evolution, 4, 291 (1950).

  3. 3

    Carter, G. S., “Animal Evolution” (London, 1951).

  4. 4

    Mayr, E., and de Schauensee, R. M., Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 91, 1 (1939).

  5. 5

    Dobzhansky, T., Genetics, 28, 162 (1943). Wright, S., and Dobzhansky, T., Genetics, 31, 125 (1946). Dobzhansky, T., and Levene, H., Genetics, 33, 537 (1948).

  6. 6

    Cain, A. J., and Sheppard, P. M., Heredity, 4, 275.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology and Comparative Anatomy, University of Oxford

    • A. J. CAIN

Authors

  1. Search for A. J. CAIN in:

About this article

Publication history

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/168424a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.