Soviet Genetics : The Real Issue*

Abstract

ONE misapprehension must be dealt with. Quite intelligent people often seem to think that, when a new theory wholly or partly replaces an old one, the whole fabric of the relevant branch of science has to be scrapped. That, of course, is quite incorrect. For example, the acceptance of relativity theory has not involved the jettisoning of classical Newtonian mechanics, but has in the great majority of cases only meant a slight correction, negligible for most purposes, in a number of laws. The body of ascertained knowledge remains : it has merely to be rendered more exact and incorporated into a more comprehensive framework. The same holds for neo-Mendelism : whatever new theories Lysenko or anyone else may contribute to genetics, the vast body of scientific fact comprised in neo-Mendelism remains as a contribution to our knowledge of the universe. (The difference between the two examples is that whereas Einstein has successfully introduced a radically new theory, or framework of ideas, to correlate the physical facts involved, there is at present no prospect of neo-Mendelian theory being overthrown by Lysenko's ideas–they are too vague to deserve the title of a framework—or, indeed, by any other general theory of genetics and evolution.)

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HUXLEY, J. Soviet Genetics : The Real Issue*. Nature 163, 974–982 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1038/163974a0

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.