Abstract
LORD RUSSELL interprets human knowledge narrowly.He deals with scientific knowledge and takes it to be, for the most part, mathematics physics, along with the cruder common-sense knowledge on which they are based. He admits, indeed emphasizes, that psychology is in some respects a distinct discipline, which has to be taken into account and has a certain primacy. Granted these limitations, which are certainly convenient for exposition, the book is a masterly and comprehensive piece of work. It contains, in the reviewer's opinion, far the best treatment that has yet appeared of the problems of inductive generalization. This is the central theme of the book and one on which Lord Russell has barely touched in previous books. There is a discussion of language (Part 2) intended to clear up ambiguities and dispose of fallacies, not very different from that in his "Inquiry into Meaning and Truth". There is a valuable section on probability (Part 5) which is intended to specify the useful but subordinate part which the mathematical theory of probability plays ; subordinate, because mathematical theory cannot be applied unless the basic problem of induction is taken as solved already, and because another non-mathematical notion of 'credibility' is required.
Human Knowledge
Its Scope and Limits. By Bertrand Russell. Pp. 538. (London : George Allen and Unwin, Ltd., 1948.) 18s. net.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
RITCHIE, A. Human Knowledge. Nature 163, 267–268 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1038/163267a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/163267a0