Abstract
IN a recent letter in Nature1, Schofield and Swain comment, inter alia, upon the failure of resonance theory to explain non-nitration of isoquinoline in position 7 : the following results may be of interest.
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
$199.00
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
from$8.99
All prices are NET prices.
References
- 1.
Nature, 161, 690 (1948).
- 2.
Hoffmann and Königs, Ber., 16, 736 (1883). v. Braun, Grabowski and Rawicz, Ber., 46, 3173 (1913).
- 3.
Noelting and Collin, Ber., 17, 265, 268 (1884).
- 4.
Andersag, Chem. Zentr., 1, 3595 (1934).
- 5.
Landsberger, Ber., 31, 2880 (1898).
- 6.
Ehrlich and Pistschimuka, Ber., 45, 2431 (1912).
Author information
Affiliations
Research Laboratories, May and Baker, Ltd., Dagenham, Essex. May 5.
- DAVID W. MATHIESON
- & A. MCCOUBREY
Authors
Search for DAVID W. MATHIESON in:
Search for A. MCCOUBREY in:
Rights and permissions
To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.
About this article
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
