Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Reply: The Thomas Jefferson paternity case

Abstract

It is true that men of Randolph Jefferson's family could have fathered Sally Hemings’ later children. Space constraints prevented us from expanding on alternative interpretations of our DNA analysis, including the interesting one proposed by Davis. The title assigned to our study was misleading in that it represented only the simplest explanation of our molecular findings: namely, that Thomas Jefferson, rather than one of the Carr brothers, was likely to have been the father of Eston Hemings Jefferson.

Foster et al. reply

It had been suggested to us earlier (by Herbert Barger, who also helped to recruit the descendants of Field Jefferson who participated in our study) that Isham Jefferson, son of Thomas Jefferson's brother Randolph, might have been the father of one or more of Sally Hemings’ children. Barger's proposal was based on a statement5 that Isham was reared by Thomas Jefferson; he suggested that Isham could have been at Monticello or at Snowden (Snowden was across the James River from Scottsville, which is about 20 miles from Monticello) when Eston Hemings was conceived. But it is not known for certain that Isham was at Monticello at that time, whereas it is documented that Thomas Jefferson was. From the historical knowledge we have, we cannot conclude that Isham, or any other member of the Jefferson family, was as likely as Thomas Jefferson to have fathered Eston Hemings.

We know from the historical and the DNA data that Thomas Jefferson can neither be definitely excluded nor solely implicated in the paternity of illegitimate children with his slave Sally Hemings. When we embarked on this study, we knew that the results could not be conclusive, but we hoped to obtain some objective data that would tilt the weight of evidence in one direction or another. We think we have provided such data and that the modest, probabilistic interpretations we have made are tenable at present.

See also David M. Abbey and Gary Davis

References

  1. Foster, E. A. et al. Nature 396, 27–28 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayo, B. & Bear, J. A. Jr Thomas Jefferson and his Unknown Brother (Univ. Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, 1981).

  3. Brodie, F. M. Thomas Jefferson: An Intimate History (Norton, New York, 1974).

  4. Randall, W. S. Thomas Jefferson: A Life (Holt, New York, 1993).

  5. History of Todd County, Kentucky (1884).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foster, E., Jobling, M., Taylor, P. et al. Reply: The Thomas Jefferson paternity case. Nature 397, 32 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/16181

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/16181

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing