Abstract
All workers on colour vision will, I am sure, welcome Dr. Karplus' letter, especially for the historical notes on the dispute between Koenig and Hering. It is quite evident from this that the dichromatism of the central fovea, when reported by Koenig fifty years ago, was the subject of some heated discussion; at the same time, when Willmer1 re-discovered the effect in 1944, it is probably true to say that most workers in the subject had either ignored or were ignorant of both Koenig's results and Hering's discussion of them, and I would have to admit to being among that number. No doubt there were exceptions, and Dr. Karplus is certainly one honourable example; but then I understand that he had the great privilege of working under Koenig in his laboratory—a privilege that may well be unique among those alive to-day.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Willmer, E. N., Nature, 153, 774 (1944).
Willmer, E. N., and Wright, W. D., Nature, 156, 119 (1945).
Thomson, L. C., and Wright, W. D., J. Physiol, 105, 316 (1947).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WRIGHT, W. Letter. Nature 160, 647–648 (1947). https://doi.org/10.1038/160647b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/160647b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.