Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Effect of lutein and antioxidant dietary supplementation on contrast sensitivity in age-related macular disease: a randomized controlled trial

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 61, pages 1121–1127 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of the study is to determine the effect of lutein combined with vitamin and mineral supplementation on contrast sensitivity in people with age-related macular disease (ARMD).

Design:

A prospective, 9-month, double-masked randomized controlled trial.

Setting:

Aston University, Birmingham, UK and a UK optometric clinical practice.

Subjects:

Age-related maculopathy (ARM) and atrophic age-related macular degeneration (AMD) participants were randomized (using a random number generator) to either placebo (n=10) or active (n=15) groups. Three of the placebo group and two of the active group dropped out.

Interventions:

The active group supplemented daily with 6 mg lutein combined with vitamins and minerals. The outcome measure was contrast sensitivity (CS) measured using the Pelli–Robson chart, for which the study had 80% power at the 5% significance level to detect a change of 0.3 log units.

Results:

The CS score increased by 0.07±0.07 and decreased by 0.02±0.18 log units for the placebo and active groups, respectively. The difference between these values is not statistically significant (z=−0.903, P=0.376).

Conclusion:

The results suggest that 6 mg of lutein supplementation in combination with other antioxidants is not beneficial for this group. Further work is required to establish optimum dosage levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  • Bartlett H, Eperjesi F (2003). A randomised controlled trial investigating the effect of nutritional supplementation on visual function in normal, and age-related macular disease affected eyes: design and methodology [ISRCTN78467674]. BMC Nutr J 2, 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett H, Eperjesi F (2004). An ideal ocular nutritional supplement? Ophthal Physiol Opt 24, 339–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett H, Eperjesi F (2005). Adverse reactions and contraindications for ocular nutritional supplements. Ophthal Physiol Opt 25, 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty S, Murray IJ, Henson DB, Carden D, Koh H, Boulton ME (2001). Macular pigment and risk for age-related macular degeneration in subjects from a Northern European population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42, 439–446.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berendschot TT, Goldbohm RA, Klopping WA, van de Kraats J, van Norel J, van Norren D (2000). Influence of lutein supplementation on macular pigment, assessed with two objective techniques. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41, 3322–3326.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein PS, Khachik F, Carvalho LS, Muir GJ, Zhao DY, Katz NB (2001). Identification and quantitation of carotenoids and their metabolites in the tissues of the human eye. Exp Eye Res 72, 215–223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bird AEC, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Chisholm IH, Coscas G, Davis MD et al. (1995). An International classification and grading system for age- related maculopathy and age related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol 39, 367–374.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bone RA, Landrum JT, Mayne S, Gomez C, Tibor S, Twaroska E (2001). Macular pigment in donor eyes with and without AMD: a case–control study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42, 235–240.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen PE, Espinosa SM, Hussain EA, Stacewicz-Sapuntzakis M (2002). Esterification does not impair lutein bioavailability in humans. J Nutr 132, 3668–3673.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breithaupt D, Bamedi A, Wirt U (2002). Carotenol fatty acid esters: easy substrates for digestive enzymes? Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, BiochemMol Biol 132, 721–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew E, Ferris FL, de Monasterio F, Thompson D, Kim J, Csaky C et al. (2003). Dose ranging study of lutein supplementation in persons over age 60. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 E-Abstract 968.

  • Chung H-Y, Rasmussen H, Johnson E (2004). Lutein bioavaliability is higher from lutein-enriched eggs that from supplements and spinach in men. J Nutr 134, 1887–1893.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dagnelie G, Zorge I, McDonald T (2000). Lutein improves visual function in some patients with retinal degeneration: a pilot study via the internet. Optometry (St Louis Mo) 71, 147–164.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeFreitas Z (2004). Prevalence of Lutein Versus Lutein Estecs in Human Diets. Kemin Health, LC Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • EDCCS Group (1993). Antioxidant status and neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The eye disease case control study group. Arch Ophthalmol 111, 104–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott DB, Sanderson K, Conkey A (1990). The Reliability of the Pelli–Robson contrast sensitivity chart. Ophthal Physiol Opt 10, 21–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher D, Schuchard R (2006). Visual functionin patients with choroidal neovascularization resulting from age-related macular degeneration: the importance of looking beyond visual acuity Optom. Vis Sci 83, 178–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin T (1980). The Biochemistry of Carotenoids. Vol 1. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Granado F, Olmedilla B, Blanco I (2002). Serum depletion and bioavaliability of lutein in type I diabetic patients. EurJ Nutr 41, 47–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Schneck M, Lott L, Brabyn J (2000). The relation between visual acuity and other spatial vision measures. Optom Vis Sci 77, 653–662.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond Jr BR, Johnson EJ, Russell RM, Krinsky NI, Yeum KJ, Edwards RB et al. (1997). Dietary modification of human macular pigment density. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38, 1795–1801.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond BR, Wooten BR, Curran-Celentano J (2001). Carotenoids in the retina and lens: possible acute and chronic effects on human visual performance. Arch Biochem Biophys 385, 41–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyvarinen L (1995). Contrast sensitivity testing in clinical practice. Br J Ophthalmol 79, 867–868.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hyvarinen L, Laurinen P, Rovamo J (1983). Contrast sensitivity in evaluation of visual impairment due to macular degeneration and optic nerve lesions. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenhagen) 61, 161–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jin C, Wu D, Wu L (1992). The contrast sensitivity function in low vision. Yen Ko Hsueh Pao 8.

  • Klein R, Klein B, Jensen S, Meuer S (1997). The five-year incidence and progression of age-related maculopathy: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 104, 7–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krinsky NI (2002). Possible biologic mechanisms for a protective role of xanthophylls. J Nutr 132, 5405–5425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landrum JT, Bone RA (2001). Lutein, Zeaxanthin and the macular pigment. Arch Biochem Biophys 385, 28–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landrum J, Bone R (2004). Dietary lutein and zeaxanthin: reducing the risk for macular degeneration. Agro Food Ind. Hi-Tech 15, 22–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landrum JT, Bone R, Dixon Z, Etienne-Levielle V, Formosa M, Saint-Louis M (2004). Influence of lutein dosage on macular pigment response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 E-Abstract 1290.

  • Landrum JT, Bone RA, Joa H, Kilburn MD, Moore LL, Sprague KE (1997). A one year study of the macular pigment: the effect of 140 days of a lutein supplement. Exp Eye Res 65, 57–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mares-Perlman J (1999). Too soon for lutein supplements. Am J Clin Nutr 70, 431–432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moher D, Schulz K, Altman D (2001). The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 1, 2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mones J, Rubin G (2005). Contrast sensitvity as an outcome measure in patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation due to age-related macular degeneration. Eye 19, 1142–1150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newsome D, Miceli M, Liles M, Tate D, Oliver P (1994). Antioxidants in the retinal pigment epithelium. Prog Retin Eye Res 13, 101–123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noy N (2000). Vitamin A in Biochemical and Physiological Aspects of Human Nutrition M Stipanuk (Ed), WC Saunders CO: Philadelphia, pp 599–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease P, Adams A, Nuccio E (1987). Optical density of human macular pigment. Vis Res 27, 705–710.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp LM, Maple SS, Choi JH (2000). Lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations in rod outer segment membranes from perifoveal and peripheral human retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41, 1200–1209.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reading V, Weale R (1974). Macular pigment and chromatic aberration. J Optom Soc Am 64, 231–238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richer S (1999). ARMD – pilot (case series) environmental intervention data. J Am Optom Assoc 70, 24–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richer S, Stiles W, Statkute L, Pulido J, Frankowski J, Rudy D et al. (2004). Double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of lutein and antioxidant supplementation in the intervention of atrophic age-related macular degeneration: the Veterans LAST study (Lutein Antioxidant Supplementation Trial). Optometry 75, 216–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin G, Bandeen-Roche K, Huang G, Munoz B, CSchein O, Fried L et al. (2001). The association of multiple visual impairments with self-reported visual disability: SEE project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42, 64–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin G, Roche K, Prasada-Rao P, Fried L (1994). Visual imparment and disability in older adults. Optom Vis Sci 71, 750–760.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin G, West S, Munoz B, Bandeen-Roche K, KZeger S, Schein O et al. (1997). A comprehensive assessment of visual impairment in a population of older Americans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38, 557–568.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott I, Feuer W, Jacko J (2002). Impact of visual function on computer task accuracy and reaction time in a cohort of patients with age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 133, 350–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon JM, Ajani UA, Sperduto RD, Hiller R, Blair N, Burton TC et al. (1994). Dietary carotenoids, vitamins A, C, and E, and advanced age-related macular degeneration. Eye disease case–control study group. JAMA 272, 1413–1420.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snodderly DM, Brown B, Delori F, Auran J (1984). The macular pigment I. Absorbance spectra, localisation, and discrimination from other yellow pigments in primate retinas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25, 660–673.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerburg O, Siems W, Hurst J, Lewis J, Kliger D, van Kuijk F (1999). Lutein and zeaxanthin are associated with photoreceptors in the human retina. Curr Eye Res 19, 491–495.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sujak A, Gabrielska J, Grudzinsnki W, Borc R, Mazurek P, Gruszecki W (1999). Lutein and zeaxanthin as protectors of lipid membranes against oxidative damage: The structural aspects. Arch Biochem Biophys 15, 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The AREDS Research Group (2001). A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss – AREDS Report No. 8. Arch Ophthalmol 119, 1417–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The ATBC Cancer Prevention Study Group (1994). The effect of vitamin E and beta-carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers. New Engl Med J 330, 1029–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald G (1945). Human vision and the spectrum. Science 101, 653–658.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Medical Association (1997). Declaration of Helsinki. J Am Med Assoc 277, 925–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yemelyanov A, Katz N, Bernstein P (2001). Ligan-binding characterization of xanthophyll carotenoids to solubilized membrane proteins derived from human retina. Exp Eye Res 72, 381–392.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yeum K-J, Taylor A, Tang G, Russell R (1995). Measurement of carotenoids, retinoids, and tocopherols in human lenses. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci 36, 2756–2761.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zarbin M (2004). Current concepts in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 122, 598–614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project was sponsored by the UK College of Optometrists. Intervention and placebo tablets were provided by Quest Vitamins Ltd UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Opthalmic Research Group, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, UK

    H E Bartlett & F Eperjesi

Authors
  1. H E Bartlett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F Eperjesi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H E Bartlett.

Additional information

Guarantor: HE Bartlett.

Contributors: HEB and FE contributed to the design of the trial, statistical analyses, and preparation of the manuscript. HEB collected the data. HEB and FE read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartlett, H., Eperjesi, F. Effect of lutein and antioxidant dietary supplementation on contrast sensitivity in age-related macular disease: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr 61, 1121–1127 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602626

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602626

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links