Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Relationship between the surrogate anthropometric measures, foot length and chest circumference and birth weight among newborns of Sarlahi, Nepal

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 61, pages 40–46 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Background:

Classification of infants into low birth weight (LBW, <2500 g) or very low birth weight (VLBW, <2000 g) categories is a crucial step in targeting interventions to high-risk infants.

Objective:

To compare the validity of chest circumference and foot length as surrogate anthropometric measures for the identification of LBW and VLBW infants.

Subjects and setting:

Newborn infants (n=1640) born between March and June 2004 in 30 Village Development Committees of Sarlahi district, Nepal.

Design:

Chest circumference, foot length and weight (SECA 727, precise to 2 g) of newborns were measured within 72 h after birth. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for a range of cutoff points of the anthropometric measures were estimated using the digital scale measurements as the gold standard.

Results:

Among LBW infants (469/1640, 28.6%), chest circumference measures <30.3 cm were 91% sensitive and 83% specific. Similar levels of sensitivity for foot length were achieved only with considerable loss of specificity (<45%). Foot length measurements <6.9 cm were 88% sensitive and 86% specific for the identification of VLBW infants.

Conclusion:

Chest circumference was superior to foot length in classification of infants into birth weight categories. For the identification of VLBW infants, foot length performed well, and may be preferable to chest circumference, as the former measure does not require removal of infant swaddling clothes. In the absence of more precise direct measures of birth weight, chest circumference is recommended over foot length for the identification of LBW infants.

Sponsorship:

The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; the Saving Newborn Lives Initiative, Save the Children – US and the Office of Heath and Nutrition, United States Agency for International Development (see Acknowledgements).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACC/SCN (2000). Low Birthweight: Report of a Meeting in Dhaka, Bangladesh on 14–17 June 1999. In: Pojda J, Kelley L (eds). Nutrition Policy Paper No. 18. ACC/SCN in collaboration with ICDDR,B: Geneva.

  • Ahmed FU, Karim E, Bhuiyan SN (2000). Mid-arm circumference at birth as predictor of low birth weight and neonatal mortality. J Biosoc Sci 32, 487–493.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arisoy AE, Sarman G (1995). Chest and mid-arm circumferences: identification of low birth weight newborns in Turkey. J Trop Pediatr 41, 34–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava SK, Ramji S, Kumar A, Mohan M, Marwah J, Sachdev HP (1985). Mid-arm and chest circumferences at birth as predictors of low birth weight and neonatal mortality in the community. BMJ 291, 1617–1619.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhutta ZA, Darmstadt GL, Hasan B, Haws R (2005). Community-based interventions for improving perinatal and neonatal health outcomes in developing countries: review of the evidence. Pediatrics 115, 519–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christian P, Khatry SK, Katz J, Pradhan EK, LeClerq SC, Shrestha SR et al. (2003). Effects of alternative maternal micronutrient supplements on low birth weight in rural Nepal: double blind randomised community trial. BMJ 15, 571–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daga SR, Daga AS, Patole S, Kadam S, Mukadam Y (1988). Foot length measurement from foot print for identifying a newborn at risk. J Trop Pediatr 34, 16–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darmstadt GL, Badrawi N, Law PA, Alam A, Ahmed S, Husein MH et al. (2004). Topical therapy with sunflower seed oil prevents nosocomial infections and mortality in premature babies in Egypt: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J 23, 719–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA, Cousens S, Adam T, Walker N, de Bernis L (2005a). Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save? Lancet 365, 977–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darmstadt GL, Saha SK, Ahmed AS, Chowdhury MA, Law PA, Ahmed S et al. (2005b). Effect of topical treatment with skin barrier-enhancing emollients on nosocomial infections in preterm infants in Bangladesh: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365, 1039–1045.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar B, Mowlah G, Nahar S, Islam N (2002). Birth-weight status of newborns and its relationship with other anthropometric parameters in a public maternity hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr 20, 36–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gohil JR, Sosi M, Vani SN, Desai AB (1991). Footlength measurement in the neonate. Indian J Pediatr 58, 675–677.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta V, Hatwal SK, Mathur S, Tripathi VN, Sharma SN, Saxena SC et al. (1996). Calf circumference as a predictor of low birth weight babies. Indian J Pediatr 33, 119–121.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143, 29–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirve SS, Ganatra BR (1993). Foot tape measure for identification of low birth weight newborns. Indian J Pediatr 30, 25–29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain MM, Habib M, DuPont HL (1994). Association between birth weight and birth arm circumference of neonates in rural Egypt. Indian J Pediatr 61, 81–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huque F, Hussain AM (1991). Detection of low birth-weight new born babies by anthropometric measurements in Bangladesh. Indian J Pediatr 58, 223–231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James DK, Dryburgh EH, Chiswick ML (1979). Foot length – a new and potentially useful measurement in the neonate. Arch Dis Child 54, 226–230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor SK, Kumar G, Anand K (1996). Use of mid-arm and chest circumferences to predict birth weight in rural north India. J Epidemiol Community Health 50, 683–686.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J (2005). Four million neonatal deaths: Where? When? Why? Neonatal Survival Series Paper 1. Lancet 365, 891–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald PD, Ross SR, Grant L, Young D (2003). Neonatal weight loss in breast and formula fed infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 88, F472–F476.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathur A, Tak SK, Kothari P (1984). ‘Foot length’ – a newer approach in neonatal anthropometry. J Trop Pediatr 30, 333–336.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mullany LC, Darmstadt GL, Coffey P, Khatry SK, LeClerq SC, Tielsch JM (2006a). A low-cost, color-coded, hand-held spring scale accurately categorizes birth weight in low-resource settings. Arch Dis Child 91, 410–413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mullany LC, Darmstadt GL, Khatry SK, Katz J, LeClerq SC, Shrestha SR et al. (2006b). Topical applications of chlorhexidine to the umbilical cord for prevention of omphalitis and neonatal mortality in Southern Nepal: a community-based, cluster-randomized trial. Lancet 367, 910–918.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naik DB, Kulkarni AP, Aswar NR (2003). Birth weight and anthropometry of newborns. Indian J Pediatr 70, 145–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngowi JA, Redding-Lallinger R, Hirji KF (1993). An assessment of the use of anthropometric measures for predicting low birth weight. J Trop Pediatr 39, 356–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan EK, LeClerq SC, Khatry SK, Adhikari RK, Ram RM, West Jr KP et al. (1999). A Window to Child Health in the Terai, NNIPS Monograph No. 1. Nepal Nutrition Intervention Project – Sarlahi: Kathmandu, Nepal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmathullah L, Tielsch JM, Thulasiraj RD, Katz J, Coles C, Devi S et al. (2003). Impact of supplementing newborn infants with vitamin A on early infant mortality: community based randomised trial in Southern India. BMJ 327, 254–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran CR (1986). A simple device for measurement of foot length in neonates. J Trop Pediatr 32, 267–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramji S, Marwah J, Satyanarayana L, Kapani V, Mohan M, Bhargava SK (1986). Neonatal thigh circumference as an alternative indicator of low birth weight. Indian J Med Res 83, 653–654.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond EG, Tafari N, Troendle JF, Clemens JD (1994). Development of a practical screening tool to identify preterm, low-birthweight neonates in Ethiopia. Lancet 344, 524–527.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samal GC, Swain AK (2001). Calf circumference as an alternative to birth weight for identification of low birth weight babies. Indian J Pediatr 38, 275–277.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sauerborn R, Ouiminga RM, Kone B, Sama R, Oepen C, Ebrahim GJ (1990). Neonatal mid-upper-arm circumference is a valid proxy for birth-weight. Trop Med Parasitol 41, 65–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Save the Children Federation (2001). World Health Organization 2001 Estimates in: Saving Newborn Lives, State of the World's Children. pp 1–49.

  • Sharma JN, Saxena S, Sharma U (1989). Thigh circumference at birth as the best predictor of low birth weight babies. Indian J Pediatr 26, 18–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh M, Paul VK, Deorari AD, Anandalakshmi PN, Sundaram KR (1988). Simple tricoloured measuring tapes for identification of low birthweight babies by community health workers. Ann Trop Paediatr 8, 87–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tielsch JM, Darmstadt GL, Mullany LC, Khatry SK, Katz J, LeClerq SC (2005). A Community-Based, Randomized Trial of Newborn Washing with Chlorhexidine on Neonatal Mortality in Southern Nepal. Pediatric Academic Societies (Annual Meeting, May 14 2005 (Abstract)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walraven GE, Mkanje RJ, van Roosmalen J, van Dongen PW, Dolmans WM (1994). Chest circumference as a screening method for low birth weight in newborns in rural Tanzania. Trop Geogr Med 46, 14–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WHO Collaborative Study of Birth Weight Surrogates (1993). Use of a simple anthropometric measurement to predict birth weight. Bull World Health Organ 71, 157–163.

  • Wright CM, Parkinson KN (2004). Postnatal weight loss in term infants: what is ‘normal’ and do growth charts allow for it? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 89, F254–F257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD44004 and HD38753); Save the Children – US through a grant from The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (810-2054); and cooperative agreements between the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Office of Health, Infectious Diseases and Nutrition, Global Health Bureau, United States Agency for International Development (HRN-A-00-97-00015-00, GHS-A-00-03-000019-00). We thank Vishwajeet Kumar for development and provision of the foot length boards used in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    L C Mullany, G L Darmstadt, S C LeClerq & J M Tielsch

  2. Save the Children – US, Washington, DC, USA

    G L Darmstadt

  3. Nepal Nutrition Intervention Project, Sarlahi (NNIPS), Katmandu, Nepal

    S K Khatry & S C LeClerq

Authors
  1. L C Mullany
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G L Darmstadt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S K Khatry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S C LeClerq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J M Tielsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L C Mullany.

Additional information

Guarantor: LC Mullany.

Contributors: LCM – concept, design, implementation, quality control, data management, analysis, interpretation and writing of manuscript; GLD – concept, design, interpretation and writing of manuscript; SKK – design, implementation, quality control, review and approval of manuscript; SCL – design, implementation, quality control, review and approval of manuscript; JMT – concept, design, interpretation and writing of manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mullany, L., Darmstadt, G., Khatry, S. et al. Relationship between the surrogate anthropometric measures, foot length and chest circumference and birth weight among newborns of Sarlahi, Nepal. Eur J Clin Nutr 61, 40–46 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602504

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602504

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links