Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

Potentials and pitfalls for nutrition counselling in general practice

Abstract

This paper was based on collaborative research efforts from Wageningen University and the University Medical Centre St Radboud in The Netherlands and describes the rationale for web-based nutrition counselling applications in general practice as well as some of the frequently used models and theories (predominantly the Stages of Change Model). General practitioners can play an important role in cardiovascular risk reduction by giving nutrition counselling to patients at elevated cardiovascular risk. Unfortunately, general practitioners perceive barriers that may limit their nutrition counselling practices. Some of these barriers may be overcome using computer and Internet technologies. Computerized reminders for preventive services, and websites with reliable high-quality information may prove to be valuable additions to usual care. Cooperation with dieticians may also lead to improvements in nutrition counselling in general practice. For example, general practitioners could use their unique position to create awareness and motivation among patients. They could subsequently refer motivated patients to dieticians for detailed personal dietary advice.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarts H, Paulussen T & Schaalma H (1997): Physical exercise habit: on the conceptualization and formation of habitual health behaviours. Health Educat. Res. 12, 363–374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abidi SS & Goh A (2000): A personalised Healthcare Information Delivery System: pushing customised healthcare information over the WWW. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 77, 663–667.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adams J & White M (2003): Are activity promotion interventions based on the transtheoretical model effective? A critical review. Br. J. Sports Med. 37, 106–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allegrante JP & Roizen MF (1998): Can net-present value economic theory be used to explain and change health-related behaviours? Health Educat. Res. 13, i–iv.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amarenco P, Lavallée P & Touboul PJ (2004): Stroke prevention, blood cholesterol, and statins. Lancet Neurol 3, 271–278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth P (1997): Breakthrough or bandwagon? Are interventions tailored to Stage of Change more effective than non-staged interventions? Health Educat. J. 56, 166–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrows Jr RC & Clayton PD (1996): Dialogue. Privacy protection: paper or computer records? Confidentiality of healthcare records. Behav. Healthcare Tomorrow 5, 38, 41 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenheimer T & Grumbach K (2003): Electronic technology. A spark to revitalize primary care? J. Am. Med. Assoc. 290, 259–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie M, Flournoy RE, Altman DE, Blendon RJ, Benson JM & Rosenbaum MD (2000): Health information, the Internet, and the digital divide. Health Affairs 19, 255–265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brug J, van Assema P, Kok G, Lenderink T & Glanz K (1994): Self-rated dietary fat intake: associations with objective assessments of fat, psychosocial factors, and intention to change. J. Nutr. Educat. 26, 218–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell MK, DeVellis BM, Strecher VJ, Ammerman AS, DeVellis RF & Sandler RS (1994): Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings. Am. J. Public Health 84, 783–787.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen SJ, Halvorson HW & Gosselink CA (1994): Changing physician behaviour to improve disease prevention. Prev. Med. 23, 284–291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries NK (2001): Unreasoned action: possibilities for worksite interventions (in dutch). In Leefstijl en werk, eds Walburg JA, Jansen J & Vaandrager L. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drenthen T (1997): Challenges to prevention in Dutch general practice. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 65, 1943S–1945S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M, Bandura A, Triandis HC, Kanfer FH, Becker MH & Middlestadt SE (1992): Factors influencing behaviour and behaviour change: Final report—Theorist's Workshop. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford P (2000): Is the Internet changing the relationship between consumers and practitioners? J. Healthcare Qual. 22, 41–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaare J, Maillet JO, King D & Gilbride JA (1990): Perceptions of clinical decision making by dietitians and physicians. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 90, 54–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glanz K, Brug J & Van Assema P (1997): Are awareness of dietary fat intake and actual fat consumption associated? A Dutch–American Comparison. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 51, 542–547.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group (2004): Effects of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin on stroke and other major vascular events in 20356 people with cerebrovascular disease or other high-risk conditions. Lancet 363, 757–767.

  • Hiddink GJ, Hautvast JGAJ, Van Woerkum CMJ, Fieren CJ & Van ‘t Hof MA (1997a): Consumers’ expectations about nutrition guidance: the importance of primary care physicians. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 65, 1974S–1979S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hiddink GJ, Hautvast JGAJ, Van Woerkum CMJ, Fieren CJ & Van ‘t Hof MA (1997b): Driving forces and barriers to nutrition guidance practices of Dutch primary care physicians. J. Nutr. Educat. 29, 36–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwath CC (1999): Applying the transtheoretical model to eating behaviour change: challenges and opportunities. Nutr. Res. Rev. 12, 281–317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones PH (2004): Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and cardiovascular disease prevention: the search for superior treatment. Am. J. Med. 116, 17S–25S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kedward J & Dakin L (2003): A qualitative study of barriers to the use of statins and the implementation of coronary heart disease prevention in primary care. Br. J. General Pract. 53, 684–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut R & Kiesler S (2003): The social impact of Internet use. Psychol. Sci. Agenda summer, 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristal AR, Glanz K, Curry SJ & Patterson RE (1999): How can stages of change be best used in dietary interventions? J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 99, 679–684.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D (1999): Computer-based approaches to patient education: a review of the literature. J. Am. Med. Informatics Assoc. 6, 272–282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm LH, Ekbom T, Dash C, Eriksson M, Tibblin G, Schersten B & on behalf of the CELL study group (1995): The impact of health care advice given in primary care on cardiovascular risk. Br. Med. J. 310, 1105–1109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd HM, Paisley CM & Mela DJ (1995): Barriers to the adoption of reduced-fat diets in a UK population. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 95, 316–322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • López-de-Munain J, Torcal J, López V & Garay J (2001): Prevention in routine general practice: activity patterns and potential promoting factors. Prev. Med. 32, 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay B (2004): Electronic records: Albertans’ health records go online despite concerns. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 170, 457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone M, Harris R, Hooker R, Tucker T, Tanna N & Honnor S (2004): Health and the Internet—changing boundaries in primary care. Family Pract. 21, 189–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann KV & Putnam WRW (1989): Physicians’ perceptions of their role in cardiovascular risk reduction. Prev. Med. 18, 45–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mant D (1997): Effectiveness of dietary intervention in general practice. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 65, 1933S–1938S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard A (1997): Evidence-based medicine: an incomplete method for informing treatment choices. Lancet 349, 126–128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer SL, Green LW, Rosenthal AC, Husten CG, Kettel Khan L & Dietz W (2003): Possible lessons from the tobacco experience for obesity control. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 77, 1073S–1082S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mirand AL, Beehler GP, Kuo CL & Mahoney MC (2002): Physician perceptions of primary care prevention: qualitative base for the conceptual shaping of a practice intervention tool. BioMed Central Public Health 2, 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas LG, Pond CD & Roberts DK (2003): Dietitian–general practitioner interface: a pilot study on what influences the provision of effective nutrition management. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 77, 1039S–1042S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pendrak RF & Ericson RP (1998): Information technologies need to protect patient confidentiality. Healthcare Financ. Manag. 52, 66–68.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Price D, Ramachandran S, Knight T, Jones PW & Neary RH (2000): Observed changes in the lipid profile and calculated coronary risk in patients given dietary advice in primary care. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 50, 712–715.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard DA, Hyndman J & Taba F (1999): Nutritional counselling in general practice: a cost-effective analysis. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 53, 311–316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska JO & DiClemente CC (1982): Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change. Psychother.: Theory, Res. Pract. 19, 276–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska JO & DiClemente CC (1983): Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 51, 390–395.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska JO & Velicer WF (1997): The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am. J. Health Promot. 12, 38–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Harlow LL, Rossi JS & Velicer WF (1994): The transtheoretical model of change and HIV prevention: a review. Health Education Quart. 21, 471–486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ronda G (2003): The Dutch heart health community intervention ‘Hartslag Limburg’. An evaluation—thesis. Maastricht: Maastricht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safran C (1994): Online medical records save time & energy. Healthcare Informatics 11, 81–82. 84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Safran C, Sands DZ & Rind DM (1999): Online medical records: a decade of experience. Methods Inform. Med. 38, 308–312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steptoe A, Doherty S, Rink E, Kerry S, Kendrick T & Hilton S (1999): Behavioural counselling in general practice for the promotion of healthy behaviour among adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease: randomised trial. Br. Med. J. 319, 943–947.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steptoe A, Kerry S, Rink E & Hilton S (2001): The impact of behavioral counseling on stage of change in fat intake, physical activity, and cigarette smoking in adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease. Am. J. Public Health 91, 265–269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RL, Summerbell CD, Hooper L, Higgins JPT, Little PS, Talbot D & Ebrahim S (2003): Relative efficacy of differential methods of dietary advice: a systematic review. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 77, 1052S–1057S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley BC, Glanz K, Kristal AR, Hirst K, Li S, Vernon SW & Myers R (1999): Nutrition intervention for high-risk auto workers: results of the Next Step Trial. Prev. Med. 28, 284–292.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Truswell S, Hiddink GJ & Blom J (2003): Nutrition guidance by family doctors in a changing world: problems, opportunities, and future possibilities. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 77, 1089S–1092S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Binsbergen JJ (1997): Nutritional factors in Dutch family medicine: an inventory. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 65, 1967S–1973S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Binsbergen JJ & Drenthen AJM (1999): ICPC-code approach of nutritional questions in general practice: a look at the future. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 53, S22–S24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Binsbergen JJ & Drenthen AJM (2003): Patient information letters on nutrition: development and implementation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 77, S1035–S1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veen J, Bakx C, Van den Hoogen H, Verheijden M, Van den Bosch W, Van Weel C & Van Staveren W (2002): Stage-matched nutrition guidance for patients at elevated risk for cardiovascular disease: A randomized intervention study in family practice. J. Family Pract. 51, 751–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Weel C (1999): Nutritional guidance in general practice – a conceptual framework. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 53, S108–S111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Weel C (2003): Dietary advice in family medicine. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 77 (Suppl), 1008S–1010S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verheijden MW, Koelen MA, Van der Veen JE & Van Staveren WA (2002): The Stages of Change-model. A theoretical model tested in practice (in Dutch). Ned. Tijdschr. Diëtisten 57, 263–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheijden MW, Van der Veen JE, Van Zadelhoff WM, Bakx JC, Koelen MA, Van den Hoogen HJM, Van Weel C & Van Staveren WA (2003): Nutrition guidance in Dutch family practice: behavioral determinants of reduction of fat consumption. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 77, 1058S–1064S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verheijden MW, Bakx JC, Delemarre CG, Wanders AJ, Van Woudenbergh NM, Bottema BJ, Van Weel C & Van Staveren WA (2005): General practitioners’ assessment of patients’ readiness to change diet, activity, and smoking. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 57, 263–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson DC (2002): The challenge of helping patients change. J. Family Pract. 51, 759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worsley A (1999): How to improve the impact of nutrition guidance by general physicians: public health versus individual patient? Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 53, S101–S107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarnall KSH, Pollak KI, Østbye T, Krause KM & Michener JL (2003): Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am. J. Public Health 93, 635–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M W Verheijden.

Additional information

Contributors: MWV wrote the paper based on her research on nutrition counselling in general practice as partial fulfillment of her PhD degree. All studies by MWV were conducted within a collaborative research effort by Wageningen University and the University Medical Centre St Radboud in The Netherlands. JCB, WAvS and CvW played a key role in this collaborative research effort, and were the supervisors of MWV.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verheijden, M., Bakx, J., Van Weel, C. et al. Potentials and pitfalls for nutrition counselling in general practice. Eur J Clin Nutr 59 (Suppl 1), S122–S129 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602185

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602185

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links