Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Palatability and glucose, insulin and satiety responses of chickpea flour and extruded chickpea flour bread eaten as part of a breakfast

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of adding chickpea flour or extruded chickpea flour to white bread on palatability and postprandial glycaemia, insulinaemia and satiety.

Design: A randomised, single-blind, cross-over study of four 50 g available carbohydrate breakfasts.

Setting: School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University.

Subjects: In all, 12 healthy subjects were recruited through posted notices. Totally, 11 (nine male, two female) completed the study (mean±s.e.m.; age 32±2 y; body mass index, 24.7±0.8 kg/m2).

Intervention: After overnight fasting, subjects consumed a control (white) bread (WB) breakfast twice, a chickpea bread (CHB) breakfast once and an extruded chickpea bread (EXB) breakfast once. Palatability and postprandial blood glucose, insulin and satiety responses were determined. Following this, food intakes from an ad libitum buffet and for the remainder of the day were assessed.

Results: A trend towards a lower incremental area under the curve (IAUC) of glucose for the CHB breakfast compared to the WB breakfast was observed (P=0.087). The IAUC of insulin and insulinaemic index (II) of the CHB breakfast were higher (P<0.05) than for the WB breakfast. No differences in glycaemic index (GI), satiety response, food intake or palatability were observed.

Conclusions: CHB and EXB demonstrated acceptable palatability. CHB demonstrated some hypoglycaemic effect compared to WB, but neither CHB nor EXB demonstrated effects on satiety or food intake. The hyperinsulinaemic effect of CHB observed in this study requires further investigation.

Sponsorship: Grains Research and Development Corporation.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

References

  • Alonso R, Grant G, Dewey P & Marzo F (2000): Nutritional assessment in vitro and in vivo of raw and extruded peas (Pisum sativum L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 48, 2286–2290.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JW, Smith BM & Washnock CS (1999): Cardiovascular and renal benefits of dry bean and soybean intake. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 70, 464S–474S.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • AOAC (1990): Official Methods of Analysis. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemist.

  • Bjorck I, Lilijberg H & Ostman E (2000): Low glycaemic-index foods. Br. J. Nutr. 83, S149–S155.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdon I, Olson B, Backus R, Richter BD, Davis PA & Schneeman BO (2001): Beans, as a source of dietary fiber, increase cholecystokinin and apolipoprotein B48 response to test meals in men. J. Nutr. 131, 1485–1490.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand-Miller J, Holt SH, de Jong V & Petocz P (2003): Cocoa powder increases postprandial insulinemia in lean young adults. J. Nutr. 133, 3149–3152.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand-Miller JC, Holt SHA, Pawlak DB & McMillan J (2002): Glycemic index and obesity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 76, S281–S285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calbet JA & MacLean DA (2002): Plasma glucagon and insulin responses depend on the rate of appearance of amino acids after ingestion of different protein solutions in humans. J. Nutr. 132, 2174–2182.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavan JK, Kadam SS & Salunkhe DK (1986): Biochemistry and technology of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 25, 107–158.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark RL & Johnson SK (2002): Sensory acceptability of foods with added lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) kernel fiber using pre-set criteria. J. Food Sci. 67, 356–362.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englyst HN & Hudson GJ (1996): The classification and measurement of dietary carbohydrates. Food Chem. 57, 15–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englyst KN, Vinoy S, Englyst HN & Lang V (2003): Glycaemic index of cereal products explained by their content of rapidly and slowly available glucose. Br. J. Nutr. 89, 329–339.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster-Powell K, Holt SHA & Brand-Miller JC (2002): International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 76, 5–56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goni I & Valentin-Gamazo C (2003): Chickpea flour ingredient slows glycemic response to pasta in healthy volunteers. Food Chem. 81, 511–515.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy R (2001): Extrusion Cooking Technologies and Applications. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt S, Brand J, Soveny C & Hansky J (1992): Relationship of satiety to post prandial glycaemic, insulin and cholecystokinin responses. Appetite 18, 129–141.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt SHA, Brand Miller JC, Petocz P & Farmakalidis E (1995): A satiety index of common foods. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 49, 675–690.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins DJA, Kendall CWC, Augustin LSA, Franceschi SMH, Marchie A, Jenkins AL & Axelsen M (2002): Glycemic index: overview of implications in health and disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 76, S266–S273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MA, Akhtar N, Ullah I & Jaffery S (1995): Nutritional evaluation of desi and kabuli chickpeas and their products commonly consumed in Pakistan. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 46, 215–223.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeds AR (2002): Glycemic index and heart disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 76, S286–S289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leterme P (2002): Recommendations by health organisations for pulse consumption. Br. J. Nutr. 88, S239–S242.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig DS (1999): High glycaemic index foods, overeating and obesity. Pediatrics [online] 103, e26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meance S, Achour L & Briend A (1999): Comparison of starch digestibility of a blended food prepared with and without extrusion cooking. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 53, 844–848.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messina MJ (1999): Legumes and soybeans: overview of their nutritional profiles and health effects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 70, 439S–450S.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milan-Carrillo J, Reyes-Moreno C, Camacho-Hernandez IL & Rouzaud- Sandez O (2002): Optimisation of extrusion process to transform hardened chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) into a useful product. J. Sci. Food Agric. 82, 1718–1728.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul AA & Southgate DAT (1978): McCance and Widdowson's the Composition of Foods. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizkalla S, Bellisle F & Slama G (2002): Health benefits of low glycaemic index foods, such as pulses, in diabetic patients and healthy individuals. Br. J. Nutr. 88, S255–S262.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts SB (2000): High-glycemic index foods, hunger, and obesity: is there a connection? Nutr. Rev. 58, 163.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider AVC (2002): Overview of the market and consumption of pulses in Europe. Br. J. Nutr. 88, S243–S250.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne M, Thompson LU & Jenkins DJA (1983): Factors affecting starch digestibility and the glycaemic response with special reference to legumes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 38, 481–488.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Haeften TW, Voetberg GA, Gerich JE & van der Veen EA (1989): Dose-response characteristics for arginine-stimulated insulin secretion in man and influence of hyperglycemia. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 69, 1059–1064.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willett W, Manson J & Liu S (2002): Glycemic index, glycemic load and risk of type 2 diabetes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 76, S274–S280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolever TMS (1990): The glycemic index. World Rev. Nutr. Diet. 62, 120–185.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolever TMS & Jenkins DJA (1986): The use of the glycemic index in predicting the blood glucose response to mixed meals. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 43, 167–172.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolever TMS, Jenkins DJA, Ocana AM, Rao VA & Collier GR (1988): Second-meal effect: low-glycemic-index foods eaten at dinner improve subsequent breakfast glycemic response. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 48, 1041–1047.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Carl Gibbons for database construction, Damien Jolley for assistance with statistical design and analysis, Andrew Garnham for performing catheterization, Rachel Kelly and Aung Htoon for preparation of extruded chickpea flour and Amynta Baxter and Amanda Hawkins for technical assistance. We would also like to thank study participants for their time.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S K Johnson.

Additional information

Guarantor: SK Johnson.

Contributors: SKJ was involved in all parts of the study from conception to preparation of the final manuscript. SJT and RSH performed the experimental aspects of the human study and some data analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, S., Thomas, S. & Hall, R. Palatability and glucose, insulin and satiety responses of chickpea flour and extruded chickpea flour bread eaten as part of a breakfast. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 169–176 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602054

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602054

Keywords

  • glycaemic
  • insulinaemic
  • satiety
  • chickpea
  • extrusion
  • palatability

Further reading

Search

Quick links