Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Associations of menstrual pain with intakes of soy, fat and dietary fiber in Japanese women


Objective: Intakes of soy, fat, and dietary fiber may be associated with the symptoms of dysmenorrhea through their biological effects on estrogens or prostaglandin production. The present study was to examine the relationships between intakes of soy, fat, and dietary fiber and the severity of menstrual pain.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Three colleges and two nursing schools.

Subjects: A total of 276 Japanese women aged 19–24 y.

Methods: Intakes of nutrients and foods including soy products, isoflavones, fats and dietary fiber were estimated by a validated semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Severity of menstrual pain was assessed by the multidimensional scoring system reported by Andersch and Milson.

Results: Intake of dietary fiber was significantly inversely correlated with the menstrual pain scale (r=−0.12, P=0.04) after controlling for age, smoking status, age at menarche and total energy intake. Neither soy nor fat intake was significantly correlated with menstrual pain after controlling for the covariates.

Conclusions: The cross-sectional difference in dietary fiber intake across the level of menstrual pain was small in magnitude but warrants further studies.

Sponsorship: None.


Dysmenorrhea, or painful menses, is a common gynecological disorder among women in the reproductive age groups. Several theories regarding the causes of primary dysmenorrhea have been presented over the years (Deligeoroglou, 2000). Since elevated levels of prostaglandins have been found in the endometrium and menstrual fluid of dysmenorrheic women (Pickles et al, 1965), abundant evidence linking prostaglandins to dysmenorrhea has been accumulated. Increased prostaglandin production is now the most accepted theory to explain the etiology of primary dysmenorrhea (Deligeoroglou, 2000). Prostaglandin F2a (PGF2a) and PGE2 stimulate uterine contractions and cervical narrowing and increase vasopressin release, leading to ischemia and pain. Isoflavones, the phytoestrogens found mainly in soybeans, inhibit PGE2 production (Yamaki et al, 2001) and cyclooxygenase activity (Liang et al, 1999). Isoflavones also can reduce the responsiveness to PGF2a of rat uterine muscle (Picherit et al, 2000) and inhibit contractions of several types of smooth muscle (Steusloff et al, 1995). Dietary soy may have a beneficial effect on symptoms of dysmenorrhea by affecting the cyclooxygenase pathway. Estrogen has been suggested to modify PGE2 production (Miyagi et al, 1993; Pavan et al, 2001). A high intake of soy isoflavones has been shown to decrease blood estrogen levels in premenopausal women (Kurzer, 2002). Dietary fat and fiber have been also indicated to alter estrogen status (Rose et al, 1997; Wu et al, 1999). These dietary components may be associated with symptoms of dysmenorrhea through hormonal influence.

Strom et al (2001) reported that infant exposure to soy formula vs cow milk formula was not associated with menstrual cramps in young adult women. To our knowledge, no other studies have described the association of soy intake and dysmenorrhea. Epidemiolgical data on dysmenorrhea and intakes of fat and dietary fiber are also scanty. In the present cross-sectional study, we examined the relationships between intakes of soy, fat, and dietary fiber and the severity of menstrual pain among premenopausal Japanese women.


The study subjects were female students at three colleges and two nursing schools between 1998 and 2001. A total of 362 women agreed to participate in the present study and responded to a self-administered questionnaire that asked about menstrual history, demographic characteristics, smoking and drinking habits, diet, exercise, and past medical and reproductive histories. The response rate was 90.0%. The present study was approved by the institutional review board.

The severity of menstrual pain was measured using the verbal multidimensional scoring system reported by Andersch and Milson (1982). This scoring system grades pain as none, mild, moderate , or severe and takes into account the effect of pain on daily activity, systemic symptoms, and analgesic requirements. Each woman was asked to report the date of the beginning of her last menses, the length of her usual menstrual cycle, and the number of days of bleeding. For woman who reported irregular menstrual cycles, we asked the range of the length of cycles and allotted the median as her cycle length.

Exercise was assessed by asking the average hours per week spent performing various kinds of activities during the past year. The details including its validity are described elsewhere (Suzuki et al, 1998).

Diet including soy, fat, and dietary fiber intakes was assessed by a semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire. The women were asked to indicate the average frequency that they consumed 169 food items during the year prior to the study and the usual serving size of each item. We included nine food items for soy products (miso soup, tofu, deep-fried tofu, fried bean curd, dried bean curd, fermented soy beans, houba-miso, soymilk, and boiled soy beans). These nine items and some other dishes including soy products as ingredients were taken account for to obtain the estimates for total amount (g) of soy products and isoflavone intake. Isoflavone intake (mg/day) from soy products was estimated using isoflavone concentration in these soy foods (Wakai et al, 1999). The intakes of foods and nutrients were estimated from the frequency of ingestion and portion size using the Japanese Standard Tables of Food Composition, 4th and 5th editions, published by the Science and Technology Agency of Japan (2001). Fatty acid composition was evaluated using data published by Sasaki et al (1999). Detailed information on the questionnaire including its validity and reproducibility has been described elsewhere (Shimizu, 1996; Shimizu et al, 1999; Nagata et al, 2001). For example, the Spearman correlation coefficients comparing estimates of soy product intake from this questionnaire with the estimates from 12 daily diet records kept over a year period was 0.68. The corresponding figures for total fat and dietary fiber were 0.52 and 0.60.

Because of incomplete or unreliable responses to the dietary questionnaire (criteria shown in the reference by Shimizu, 1996), we did not assess the diets of 44 women. The response to the menstrual pain scale was missing for six women. One woman did not report her age. Therefore, the ultimate response rate was 77.4%. We restricted study subjects to women aged 24 y or less, because the frequency of secondary dysmenorrhea is likely to be higher in the elder women (Wentz, 1988). Therefore, 29 women were excluded. We further excluded women who had been taking steroid hormones during the previous 6 months (n=9) or who had a history of thyroid diseases (n=1) or other endocrine diseases (n=2). No one reported ovariectomy or use of oral contraceptives. The remaining 276 women aged 19–24 y consisted of the present study. Age distribution of the study subjects were 81 (29.3%), 106 (38.4%), 70 (25.4%) , 11 (3.9%), and 8 (2.9%) for 19, 20, 21, 22, 23+ y of age, respectively.

Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to examine the associations of severity of menstrual pain with study variables. Dietary values were log-transformed and adjusted for total energy using the method proposed by Willett (1990). Adjustment for potential confounders of the associations between dietary variables and the severity of menstrual pain was accomplished by regressing the menstrual pain scale and dietary values separately upon confounders. Spearman's correlation coefficients were then calculated. Several nondietary factors including weight, height, body mass index, smoking, exercise, marital status, age at menarche, menstrual cycle, days of bleeding, and number of births or pregnancies and intakes of macro- and micronutrients were examined as potential confounders. Age was always included in the model as a covariate to calculate the partial correlation coefficients. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS programs (Version 8, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).


The distribution of menstrual pain scores among the study subjects was 46 (16. 7%), 111 (40.2%), 95 (34.4%), and 24 (8.7%) for grades 0–3 (none, mild, moderate, and severe), respectively. Characteristics of subjects according to menstrual pain scale are shown in Table 1. Group comparison for any variable except age at menarche did not reveal a significant association with menstrual pain scale.

Table 1 Characteristics of study subjects according to menstrual pain score

Table 2 shows the correlation coefficients between selected nondietary variables and the menstrual pain scale. Age at menarche was significantly inversely correlated with the menstrual pain scale. Smoking status was positively associated with the menstrual pain scale, but this association was of borderline significance (P=0.06).

Table 2 Correlations of selected nondietary variables with menstrual pain scale

Dietary fiber was significantly inversely correlated with the menstrual pain scale after controlling for age, smoking status and age at menarche (r=−0.12, P=0.04) (Table 3). There were no significant correlations between the menstrual pain scale and intakes of soy product or isoflavone as well as any type of fat. The positive association between saturated fat intake and the menstrual pain scale was of borderline significance (P=0.08). The additional adjustment for marital status and numbers of days of bleeding did not alter the results substantially (for example, the correlation coefficient between dietary fiber and the menstrual pain scale was −0.13, P=0.03). Reanalysis restricting the subjects to those who reported a regular menstrual cycle with length of 25–35 days (n=156) did not attenuate the association between dietary fiber intake and the menstrual pain scale (r=−0.14, P=0.10).

Table 3 Correlation coefficients between dietary intakes and menstrual pain scale


In spite of the relatively low intake levels of dietary fiber in our study subjects, we found a moderate but significant inverse association between dietary fiber intake and menstrual pain. It is well known that primary dysmenorrhea occurs only in ovulatory cycles (Friederich, 1983), indicating that adequate uterine exposure to estrogen and then to progesterone is necessary. Studies have suggested that fiber intake decreases blood estrogen levels in women (Kaneda et al, 1997; Rose et al, 1997). Although fat intake has been associated with increased estrogen levels (Wu et al, 1999), we failed to find a significant positive association between fat intake and menstrual pain. Neither soy product nor isoflavone intake was associated with menstrual pain. We expected that dietary soy would be inversely associated with menstrual pain through its effects on estrogens or on the cyclooxygenase pathway. However, such effects did not appear to be clinically relevant regarding dysmenorrhea. It is also possible that a limited range of soy intake as well as fat intake among the study subjects may have obscured a real association. Additional findings on smoking and age at menarche in relation to menstrual pain were consistent with previous results from other studies (Klein & Litt, 1981; Sundell et al, 1990; Parazzini et al, 1994; Harlow & Park, 1996; Hornsby et al, 1998).

So far, to our knowledge, five studies have assessed the relationship between diet and menstrual pain (Deutch, 1995; Harel et al, 1996; Di Cintio et al, 1997; Balbi et al, 2000; Barnard et al, 2000). One of them (Harel et al, 1996) was based on dietary intervention using supplementation of n-3 fatty acids. In two other studies (Di Cintio et al, 1997; Balbi et al, 2000), dietary fiber as well as fat intake could not be estimated because the questionnaires used for measuring diet, which were apparently not validated, included a limited number of food items. Barnard et al (2000) reported that a low-fat vegetarian diet with a change of total fiber from 26.7 to 31.3 g was associated with an increase in sex hormone-binding globulin levels and with reductions in dysmenorrhea duration and intensity. Their findings are not contradictive with our results. In the remaining study reported by Deutch (1995), diet was measured by a 4-day diet record, and fat and dietary fiber intakes were not significantly associated with menstrual pain after controlling for covariates.

One of the limitations of our study is that we could not perform physical imaging and surgical examinations, such as uterosonography and laparoscopy, to rule out secondary cause of dysmenorrhea. The frequency of secondary dysmenorrhea is much lower than that of primary dysmenorrhea in this age group (Balbi et al, 2000). However, we cannot deny the possibility that our findings from a study with a small number of subjects were due to the inclusion of secondary dysmenorrhea.

The lack of endocrinologic measures of ovarian activity was another limitation of the present study. Women with anovulatory cycles do not experience menstrual pain. We could not determine whether each woman was ovulatory or not. Thus, there might be a concern that dietary fiber intake may be associated with anovulation rather than menstrual pain. However, when we reanalyzed data restricted to subjects with normal cycle lengths of 25–35 days, whom we thought to be ovulatory (Harlow & Ephross, 1995), the association between dietary fiber and the menstrual pain scale was not altered.

We employed a widely used scaling system to assess menstrual pain. However, pain is difficult to measure because it cannot be confirmed by any instrumental or clinical evaluation. Therefore, measurement error may have affected the results. However, it seems unlikely that women who had a lower intake of dietary fiber reported their pain more inaccurately or perceived more pain than those with a higher intake of dietary fiber. The food-frequency questionnaire, like all methods of dietary assessment, is subject to measurement error. Our questionnaire was designed to measure an individual's relative intakes of foods and nutrients rather than absolute values. The data presented for soy products may have been overestimated because soy product intake estimated from the questionnaire was 40% higher than that estimated from the 12 daily diet records. The estimate for dietary fiber was 8% higher than that from the diet records. However, again, it is likely that this measurement error was unrelated to menstrual pain and led to an underestimation of the true associations.

Owing to the cross-sectional study design, we can only infer associations. Neuroendocrine functions of the body, mental attitude, and food choice may be mutually related. It is possible that the decreased intake of dietary fiber might be a consequence of menstrual pain. However, if this is true, intakes of other nutrients should also have been affected. None of the other measured nutrients or food groups was associated with the menstrual pain scale. Although the cross-sectional differences in dietary fiber intake across the level of menstrual pain was small in magnitude, more attention should be paid to the role of diet, including soy, fat, and dietary fiber, in the etiology of dysmenorrhea cases that are amenable to public health intervention.


  1. Andersch B & Milson I (1982): An epidemiologic study of young women with dysmenorrhea. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 144, 655–660.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barnard ND, Scialli ARS, Hrlock D & Bertron P (2000): Diet and sex-hormone binding globulin, dysmenorrhea, and premenstrual symptoms. Obstet. Gynecol. 95, 245–250.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balbi C, Musone R, Menditto, Di Prisco L, Cassese E, D'Ajello nM, Ambrosio D & Cardone AA (2000): Influence of menstrual factors and dietary habits on menstrual pain in adolescence age. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 91, 143–148.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deligeoroglou E (2000): Dysmenorrhea. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 900, 237–244.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deutch B (1995): Menstrual pain in Danish women correlated with low n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 49, 508–516.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Di Cintio E, Parazzini F, Tozzi L, Luchini L, Mezzopane R, Marchini M & Fedele L (1997): Dietary habits, reproductive and menstrual factors and risk of dysmenorrhoea. Eur. J. Epidemiol . 13, 925–930.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Friederich MA (1983): Dysmenorrhea. Women Health 8, 91–106.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Harel Z, Biro FM, Kottenhahn RK & Rosenthal SL (1996): Supplementation with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in the management of dysmenorrhea in adolescents. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 174, 1335–1338.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harlow SD & Ephross SA (1995): Epidemiology of menstruation and its relevance to women's health. Epidemiol. Rev . 17, 265–286.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harlow S & Park M (1996): A longitudinal study of risk factors for the occurrence, duration and severity of menstrual cramps in a cohort of college women. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 103, 1134–1142.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hornsby PP, Wilcox AJ & Weinberg CR (1998): Cigarette smoking and disturbance of menstrual function. Epidemiology 9, 193–198.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaneda N, Nagata C, Kabuto M & Shimizu H (1997): Fat and fiber intakes in relation to serum estrogen concentration in premenopausal Japanese women. Nutr. Cancer 27, 279–283.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Klein JR & Litt IF (1981): Epidemiology of adolescent dysmenorrhea. Pediatrics 68, 661–664.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurzer MS (2002): Hormonal effects of soy in premenopausal women and men. J. Nutr. 132, 570S–573S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liang Y-C, Huang Y-T, Tsai S-H, Lin-Shiau S-Y, Chen C-F & Lin J-K (1999): Suppression of inducible cyclooxygenase and inducible nitric oxide synthase by apigenin and related flavonoids in mouse macrophages. Carcinogenesis 20, 1945–1952.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miyagi M, Morishita M & Iwamoto Y (1993): Effects of sex hormones on production of prostaglandin E2 by human peripheral monocytes. J. Periodontol. 64, 1075–1078.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagata C, Takatsuka N, Kawakami N & Shimizu H (2001): Soy product intake and hot flashes in Japanese women: results from a community-based prospective study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 153, 790–793.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pavan B, Biondi C, Ferretti ME, Lunghi L & Paganetto G (2001): 17 ß-estradiol medulates prostaglandin E2 release from human amnion-derived WISH cells. Biol. Reprod. 64, 1677–1681.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parazzini F, Tozzi L, Mezzopane R, Luchini L, Marchini M & Fedele L (1994): Cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and risk of primary dysmenorrhea. Epidemiology 5, 469–472.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Picherit C, Dalle M, Néliat G, Lebecque P, Davicco MJ, Barlet JP & Coxam V (2000): Genistein and daidzein modelate in vitro rat uterine contractile activity. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 75, 201–208.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pickles VR, Hall WJ, Best FA & Smith GN (1965): Prostaglandins in endometrium and menstrual fluid from normal and dysmenorrhoeic subjects. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Comm. 72, 185–192.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rose DP, Lubin M & Connolly JM (1997): Effects of diet supplementation with wheat bran on serum estrogen levels in the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. Nutrition 13, 535–539.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sasaki S, Kobayashi M & Tsugane S (1999): Development of substituted fatty acid composition table for the use in nutritional epidemiologic studies for Japanese populations: its methodological backgrounds and the evaluation. J. Epidemiol. 9, 190–207.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shimizu H (1996): The Basic Report on Takayama Study. Gifu, Japan: Department of Public Health, Gifu University School of Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shimizu H, Ohwaki A, Kurisu Y, Takatsuka N, Kawakami N, Ido M, Nagata C & Inaba S (1999): Validity and reproducibility of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire for a cohort study in Japan. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 38–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Steusloff A, Paul E, Semenchuk LA, Di Salvo J & Pfitzer G (1995): Modulation of Ca2+ sensitivity in smooth muscle by genistein and protein tyrosine phosphorylation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 320, 236–242.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Strom BL, Schinnar R, Ziegler EE, Barnhart KT, Sammel MD, Macones GA, Stallings VA, Drulis JM, Nelson SE & Hanson SA (2001): Exposure to soy-based fomula in infancy and endocrinological and reproductive outcomes in young adulthood. JAMA 286, 807–814.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sundell G, Milson I & Andersch B (1990): Factors influencing the prevalence and severity of dysmenorrhea in young women. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 97, 588–594.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Suzuki I, Kawakami N & Shimizu H (1998): Reliability and validity of a questionnaire for assessment of energy expenditure and physical activity in epidemiological studies. J. Epidemiol. 8, 152–159.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Willett W (1990): Implication of total energy intake for epidemiological analyses. In Nutritional Epidemiology ed. W Willett, pp 245–271. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wu AH, Pike MC & Stram DO (1999): Meta-analysis: dietary fat intake, serum estrogen levels, and the risk of breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91, 529–534.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wentz AC (1988): Dysmenorrhea, premenstrual syndrome, and related disorders. In Novak's Textbook of Gynecology eds. Jones HW, Wentz AC, Burnett LB, pp 240–251. London: Williams & Willkins.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wakai K, Egami I, Kato K, Kawamura T, Tamakoshi A, Lin Y, Nakayama T, Wada M & Ohno Y (1999): Dietary intake and sources of isoflavones among Japanese. Nutr. Cancer 33, 139–145.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yamaki K, Kim D-H, Ryu N, Kim YP, Shin KH & Ohuchi K (2001): Effects of naturally occurring isoflavones on prostaglandin E2 production. Planta Med. 68, 97–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Nagata.

Additional information

Guarantor: C Nagata.

Contributors: CN designed and coordinated the study and had overall responsibility for data analysis and writing the paper. KH and NS coordinated for sample collection. HS helped to design the study and undertook data interpretation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagata, C., Hirokawa, K., Shimizu, N. et al. Associations of menstrual pain with intakes of soy, fat and dietary fiber in Japanese women. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 88–92 (2005).

Download citation


  • dysmenorrhea
  • soy
  • isoflavones
  • fat
  • dietary fiber


Quick links