Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

Variation in nutrient intakes among women in Shanghai, China

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 58, pages 1604–1611 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

Background: In 1997, we launched a large population-based cohort study, the Shanghai Women Health Study (SWHS), to investigate diet in relation to cancer risk among 74 943 Chinese women. Simultaneously, a dietary calibration study was conducted among 200 SWHS participants with biweekly 24-h dietary recall (24HDR) over a 1-y period in order to evaluate the validity and reliability of the SWHS food frequency questionnaire (FFQ).

Objective: The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the nature and magnitude of variances for intake of 26 nutrients among SWHS participants, and to estimate the number of 24HDR needed for estimate intake of the 26 nutrients examined in the study population.

Design: In all, 1-y biweekly 24HDR collected from 200 healthy, free-living women aged between 40 and 70 y, who participated in the SWHS dietary calibration study, was analyzed by mixed effects model and ratios of within-individual and between-individual dietary intake variances (w2/b2) were estimated.

Results: In agreement with reports from studies conducted in the US, we found that within-individual variances were larger than between-individual variances in dietary intake of most nutrients. The sum of all other variation (eg, weekday and weekend, seasonal, interviewer) accounted for less than 5% of total variation. Ratios of within- to between-individual variances (for log transformed data) ranged from 1.05 (carbohydrate) to 2.79 (fat) for macronutrient intake, 1.74 (niacin) to 8.48 (δ-tocopherol) for vitamin intake, and 1.35 (phosphorus) to 5.59 (sodium) for mineral intake.

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that within- and between-individual differences in nutrient intake are the major sources of variation in this population of adult Chinese women. Cultural practices as well as seasonal supply and consumption patterns of vegetable intake are likely the major contributors to the variation. Implications of these results are discussed.

Sponsorship: This study is supported by the NIH grant R01CA70867.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beaton GH, Milner J, Corey P & McGuire V et al. (1979): Source of variance in 24-hour dietary recall data: implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 32, 2546–2549.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beaton GH, Milner J, McGuire V, Feather TE & Little JA (1983): Source of variance in 24-hour dietary recall data: implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. Carbohydrate sources, vitamins, and minerals. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 37, 986–995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buzzard IM, Faucett CL, Jeffery RW, McBane L, McGovern P, Baxter JS, Shapiro AC, Blackburn GL, Chlebowski RT, Elashoff RM & Wynder EL (1996): Monitoring dietary change in a low-fat diet intervention study: advantages of using 24-hour dietary recalls vs food records. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 96, 574–579.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenheim JL & Marshall JR (1988): The problem of profound mismeasurement and the power of epidemiological studies of diet and cancer. Nutr. Cancer 11, 243–250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman AM, Brown CC, Palmgren J, Pietinen P, Verkasalo M, Myer D & Virtamo J (1990): Variability in nutrient and food intakes among older middle-aged men. Am. J. Epidemiol. 132, 999–1012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert JR, Clemow L, Pbert L, Ockene IS & Ockene JK (1995): Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures. Int. J. Epidemiol. 24, 389–398.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert JR, Gupta PC, Mehta H, Ebbeling CB, Bhonsle RR & Varghese F (2000): Sources of variability in dietary intake in two distinct regions of rural India: implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 54, 479–486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert JR, Hurley TG, Chiraboga DE & Barone J (1998): A comparison of selected nutrient intakes derived from three diet assessment methods used in a low-fat maintenance trial. Public Health Nutr. 1, 207–214.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert JR & Miller DR (1988): Methodologic considerations for investigating the diet–cancer link. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 47, 1068–1077.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt WC, Leonard AG, Garry PJ & Goodwin JS (1983): Components of variance in dietary data for an elderly population. Nutr. Res. 3, 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter DJ (1999): Role of dietary fat in the causation of breast cancer: counterpoint. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 8, 9–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlmeier L (1995): Future of dietary exposure assessment. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 61 (Suppl), 702S–709S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu K (1989): Consideration of and compensation of intra-individual variability in nutrient intakes. In Epidemiology, nutrition and health, eds Kohlmeier L & Helsing E London: Smith-Gordon; Niigate, Japan: Nishimura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu K, Stamler J, Dyer A, McKeever J & Mckeever P (1978): Statistical methods to assess and minimize the role of intra-individual variability in obscuring the relationship between dietary lipids and serum cholesterol. J. Chron. Dis. 31, 399–418.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mcavay G & Rodin J (1998): Interindividual and intraindividual variation in repeated measures of 24-hour dietary recall in the elderly. Appetite 11, 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcgee D, Rhoads G, Hankin J, Yano K & Tillotson J (1982): Within-person variability of nutrient intake in a group of Hawaiian men of Japanese ancestry. Am J. Clin. Nutr. 36, 657–663.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa K, Tsubono Y, Nishino Y, Watanabe Y, Ohkubo T, Watanabe T, Nakatsuka H, Takahashi N, Kawamura M, Tsuji I & Hisamichi S (1999): Inter- and Intra-individual variation of food and nutrient consumption in a rural Japanese population. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 53, 781–785.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oh S-Y & Hong MH (1999): Within- and Between-person variation of nutrient intakes of older people in Korea. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 53, 625–629.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Posner BM, Martin-Munley SS, Smigelski C, Cupples LA, Cobb JL, Schaefer E, Miller DR & D'Agostino RB (1992): Comparison of techniques for estimating nutrient intake: The Framingham Study. Epidemiology 3, 171–177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sempos CT, Johnson NE, Smith EL & Gilligan C (1985): Effects of intraindividual and interindividual variation in repeated dietary records. Am. J. Epidemiol. 121, 120–130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shu XO, Yang G, Jin F, Liu DK, Gao YT & Zheng W (2004): Validity and reproducibility of the food frequency questionnaire used in the Shanghai Women's Health Study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 58, 17–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stamler J, Caggiula A, Grandits GA, Kjelsberg M & Cutler JA (1996): Relationship to blood pressure of combinations of dietary macronutrients. Findings of the multiple risk factor intervention trial (MRFIT). Circulation 94, 2417–2423.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stram DO, Hankin JH, Wilkens LR, Pike MC, Monroe KR, Park S, Henderson BE, Nomura AM, Earle ME, Nagamine FS & Kolonel LN (2000): Calibration of the dietary questionnaire for a multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles. Am. J. Epidemiol. 151, 358–370.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subar AF, Thompson FE, Kipnis V & Subar et al. (2001): respond to ‘A further look at dietary questionnaire validation’ and ‘Another perspective on food frequency questionnaires’. Am. J. Epidemiol. 154, 1105–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarasuk V & Beaton GH. (1991): The nature and individuality of within-subject variation in energy intake. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 54, 464–470.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tokudome Y, Imaeda N, Nagaya T & Ikeda M et al. (2002): Daily, weekly, seasonal, within- and between-individual variation in nutrient intake according to four season consecutive 7 day weighed diet records in Japanese female dietitians. J. Epidemiol. 12, 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang GY & Shen ZP (eds) (1991): Chinese Food Composition Table. Beijing: People's Health Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett W (1998): Nutritional Epidemiology 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Willett WC (2001): Diet and cancer: One view at the start of the millennium. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 10, 3–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • William HC, Andrea LG, Philip GJ & James GS (1983): Components of variance in dietary data for an elderly population. Nutr. Res. 3, 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler RG, Wilcox HB, Mason TJ, Bill JS & Virgo PW (1987): Seasonal variation in intake of carotenoids and vegetables and fruits among white men in New Jersey. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 45, 107–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Center for Health Services Research and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA

    H Cai, X-O Shu, G Yang & W Zheng

  2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, and South Carolina Cancer Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

    J R Hebert

  3. Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, People's Republic of China

    F Jin, D-K Liu & Y-T Gao

Authors
  1. H Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. X-O Shu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J R Hebert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. G Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. D-K Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Y-T Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. W Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X-O Shu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cai, H., Shu, XO., Hebert, J. et al. Variation in nutrient intakes among women in Shanghai, China. Eur J Clin Nutr 58, 1604–1611 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602013

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602013

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links