Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

Detection of cardiovascular risk factors by anthropometric measures in Tehranian adults: receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis

Abstract

Objective: To determine optimal cutoff points of anthropometric measures as cardiovascular indicators in an Iranian adult population.

Design: Population-based cross-sectional study.

Setting: Tehran, the capital of Iran.

Subjects: A total of 10 522 subjects (4449 men and 6073 women) aged 18–74 y.

Methods: Demographic data were collected and anthropometric indices were measured. Blood pressure was evaluated and hypertension was defined based on JNC VI. Biochemical measurements were done. Diabetes was considered as FBS≥126 mg/dl (≥7.0 mmol/l) and dyslipidemia was defined according to ATP II. Risk factors were considered as: hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, ‘hypertension or diabetes’, ‘hypertension and diabetes’, ‘hypertension or dyslipidemia’, ‘hypertension and dyslipidemia’, ‘ diabetes or dyslipidemia’, ‘diabetes and dyslipidemia’, ‘at least one risk factor’ and ‘at least two risk factors’. ROC curve analysis was performed to determine optimal cutoff values—where the sensitivity approximates specificity.

Results: Younger men (the age category of 18–34 y) had higher WC than women. Men had higher waist-to-hip ratio (WHpR) and lower waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) than women in all age categories. Dyslipidemia, ‘hypertension or dyslipidemia’, ‘diabetes or dyslipidemia’ and ‘at least one risk factor’ were more prevalent risk categories in both genders. Range of areas under ROC curves for BMI and WC was 0.55–0.94 and 0.56–0.93 for men and 0.41–0.94 and 0.53–0.92 for women in various age groups, respectively. Range of areas for WHpR and WHtR in men was between 0.58–0.87 and 0.56–0.94, respectively, and for women varied between 0.53–0.91 and 0.53–0.90 in various age groups, respectively. Cutoff points of BMI for various risk factors were between 24 and 29 kg/m2 in men and 25–31 kg/m2 in women. Range of WHpR was between 0.86 and 0.97 in men and between 0.78 and 0.92 in women. Cutoff points for WC and WHtR were between 80 and 93 cm and 0.47 and 0.56 for men and between 79 and 96 cm and 0.50 and 0.63 for women in different age groups to detect various risk factors, respectively. In general, values were lowest for the most prevalent risk factors and highest for less prevalent conditions.

Conclusion: The results suggested cutoff points of anthropometric measures as indicators of cardiovascular risk factors. It seems that these cut-points are higher for Iranians than for other Asian populations.

Sponsorship: Endocrine Research Center, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azizi F, Allahverdian S, Mirmiran P, Rahmani M & Mohammadi F (2001): Dietary factors and body mass index in a group of Iranian adolescents: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 71, 123–127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Azizi F, Esmaillzadeh A & Mirmiran P (2004): Obesity in relation to cardiovascular disease risk factors: an epidemiologic study in Tehran. Iranian J. Endocrinol. Metab., in press.

  • Azizi F, Rahmani M, Emami H & Majid M (2000): Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study: rationale and design. C.V.D. Prev. 3, 242–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayatollahi SM & Carpenter RG (1993): Height, weight, BMI and weight-for-height of adults in southern Iran: how should obesity be defined? Ann. Hum. Biol. 20, 13–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beegom R, Beegom R, Niaz MA & Singh RB (1995): Diet, central obesity and prevalence of hypertension in urban population of south India. Int. J. Cardiol. 51, 183–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bray GA & Gray DS (1988): Treatment of obesity: an overview. Diabetes Metab. Rev. 4, 653–679.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dary KP, Evans SL, Stevenson ET & Sales DR (1996): Adiposity and regional body fat distribution in physically active young and middle-aged women. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 20, 777–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dipietro L, Katz LD & Nadel ER (1999): Excess abdominal adiposity remains correlated with altered lipid concentrations in healthy older women. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 23, 432–436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbelsteyn CJ, Joffres MR, MacLean DR, Flowerdew G & the Canadian Heart Health Surveys Research Group (2001): A comparative evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index as indicators of cardiovascular risk factors: The Canadian Heart Health Surveys. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 25, 652–661.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. (1997): Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diab. Care 20, 1183.

  • Folsom AR, Kaye SA, Sellers TA, Hong CP, Cerhan JR, Potter JD & Prineas RJ (1993): Body fat distribution and 5-year risk of death in older women. JAMA 269, 483–487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher D, Visser M, Sepulveda D, Pierson RN, Harris T & Heymsfield SB (1996): How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex and ethnic groups. Am. J. Epidemiol. 143, 228–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins M, Kannel W, Garrison R, Pinsky J & Stokes J (1988): Hazards of obesity—the Framingham experience. Acta. Med. Scand. 723, S23–S36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh SD, Yoshinaga H (1995): Abdominal fat distribution and coronary heart disease risk factors in men-waist/height ratio as a simple and useful predictor. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 19, 585–589.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ito H, Nakasuga K, Ohshima A, Maruyama T, Kaji Y, Harada M, Fukunaga M, Jingo S and Sakamoto M (2003): Detection of cardiovascular risk factors by indices of obesity obtained from anthropometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Japanese individuals. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 27, 232–237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. (1997): Sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure. Arch. Intern. Med. 157, 2413–2446.

  • Lapidus L, Bengstsson C, Larsson B, Penerrt K, Rybo E & Sjostrom L (1984): Distribution of adipose tissue and risk of cardiovascular disease and death: a 12-year follow up of participants in the population study of women in Gothenburg, Sweden. Br. Med. J. 289, 1257–1261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ledoux M, Lambert J, Reeder BA & Despres JP (1997): A comparative analysis of weight to height and waist to hip circumference indices as indicators of the presence of cardiovascular disease risk factors. Canadian Heart Health Surveys Research Group. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 157 (Suppl 1), S32–S38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemieux S, Prud'homme D, Bouchard C, Tremblay A & Despres JP (1996): A single threshold value of waist girth identifies normal-weight and overweight subjects with excess visceral adipose tissue. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 64, 685–693.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Molarius A & Seidell JC (1998): Selection of anthropometric indicators for classification of abdominal fatness—a critical review. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 22, 719–727.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, Field AE, Colditz G & Dietz WH (1999): The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA 282, 1523–1529.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel. (1993): Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults. JAMA 269, 3015–3023.

  • Okosun IS, Liao Y, Rotimi CN, Choi S & Cooper RS (2000): Predictive values of waist circumference for dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes and hypertension in overweight white, black and Hispanic American adults. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 53, 401–408.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pishdad GR (1996): Overweight and obesity in adults aged 20–74 in southern Iran. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 20, 963–965.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pi-Sunyer FX (1993): Medical hazards of obesity. Ann. Intern. Med. 119, 655–660.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pi-Sunyer FX (2000): Obesity: criteria and classification. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 59, 505–509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pouliot MC, Despres JP, Lemieux S, Moorjani S, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Nadeau A & Lupien PJ (1994): Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and women. Am. J. Cardiol. 73, 460–468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarraf-Zadegan N, Boshtam M, Malekafzali H, Bashardoost N, Sayed-Tabatabaei FA, Rafiei M, Khalili A, Mostafavi S, Khami M & Hassanvand R (1999a): Secular trends in cardiovascular mortality in Iran, with special reference to Isfahan. Acta. Cardiol. 54, 327–333.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarraf-Zadegan N, Sayed-Tabatabaei FA, Bashardoost N, Mleki A, Totonchi M, Habibi HR, Sotodehmaram E, Tafazoli F & Karimi A (1999b): The prevalence of coronary artery disease in an urban population in Isfahan, Iran. Acta. Cardiol. 54, 257–263.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seidell J, Han T, Feskens E & Lean M (1997): Narrow hips and broad waist circumferences independently contribute to increased risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J. Intern. Med. 242, 401–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seidell JC, Cigolini M, Charzewska J, Ellsinger BM & di-Biase G (1990): Fat distribution in European women: a comparison of anthropometric measurements in relation to cardiovascular risk factors. Int. J. Epidemiol. 19, 303–308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens J, Cai J, Pamuk ER, Williamson DF, Thun MJ & Wood JL (1998): The effect of age on the association between body mass index and mortality. N. Engl. J. Med. 338, 1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei M, Gaskill SP, Haffner SM & Stern MP (1997): Waist circumference as the best predictor of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus compared to BMI, WHR over other anthropometric measurements in Mexican Americans: a 7-year prospective study. Obes. Res. 5, 16–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1997a): Obesity epidemic puts millions at risk from related diseases, Press Release WHO/46 (online), June 12;: www.who.int/inf-prp1997/en/pr97-46.html.

  • World Health Organization. (1997b): Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic, Report of WHO consultation on obesity, 3–5 June; WHO/NUT/NCD/98.1. Geneva: WHO.

  • World Health Organization. (2000): The Asia-Pacific Perspective: Redefining Obesity. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Guarantor: F Azizi.

Contributors: FA supervised the research and corrected the manuscript. PM and AE designed the study, collected and analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F Azizi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mirmiran, P., Esmaillzadeh, A. & Azizi, F. Detection of cardiovascular risk factors by anthropometric measures in Tehranian adults: receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 58, 1110–1118 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601936

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601936

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links