Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

High-fat and low-fat phenotypes: habitual eating of high- and low-fat foods not related to taste preference for fat

Abstract

Objective: To characterize taste preferences in habitual high fat (HF) and low fat (LF) phenotypes.

Design: Eighteen test solutions to taste for each subject group in a fully repeated 2×6×3 measures design.

Setting: The Human Appetite Research Unit at Leeds University, Psychology Department.

Subjects: Eight lean HF (mean percentage fat intake 43.4% daily energy) and eight lean LF (mean percentage fat intake 32.7% daily energy) were recruited from the staff/student population of Leeds University.

Interventions: All subjects were required to taste 18 solutions based on six levels of fat content and three levels of sucrose content. Subjects rated each solution for fat content, sweetness and pleasantness.

Results: HF and LF showed significant effect for the fat content of the solution on the perception of creaminess (P<0.000), and sugar content on the perception of sweetness (P<0.000). HF and LF did not differ in their taste preferences and no preferred level of fat or sweetness was detected in either group.

Conclusions: In young adult males, habitual food selection is not related to taste preference.

Sponsorship: This study was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC).

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2001) 55, 1016–1021

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blundell JE & Cooling J (1999) The high-fat and low-fat phenotype: food preferences are not related to taste preferences Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 23 (Suppl 5), S4 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell JE & Macdiarmid JI (1997) Fat as a risk factor for overconsumption: satiation, satiety, and patterns of eating J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 97(Suppl) S63–S69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooling JR & Blundell JE (1998a) Are high-fat and low-fat consumers distinct phenotypes? Differences in the subjective and behavioural response to energy and nutrient challenges Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 52 193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooling JR & Blundell JE (1998b) Differences in energy expenditure and substrate oxidation between habitual high fat and low fat consumers (phenotypes) Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 22 612–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooling JR, Barth J & Blundell JE (1998) The high-fat phenotype: Is leptin involved in the adaptive response to a high fat (high energy) diet? Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 22 1132–1135

  • de Graaf C (1993) The validity of appetite ratings Appetite 21 156–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski A (1997) Taste preferences and food intake A. Rev. Nutr. 17 237–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski A, Brunzel JD, Sande K, Iverius P & Greenwood MRC (1985) Sweet tooth reconsidered: Taste responsiveness in human obesity Physiol. Behav. 35 617–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski A & Greenwood MRC (1983) Cream and sugar: human preferences for high-fat foods Physiology and Behaviour 30 629–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski A, Shrager EE, Lipsky C, Stellar E & Greenwood MRC (1989) Sugar and fat: sensory and hedonic evaluation of liquid and solid foods Physiol. Behav. 45 177–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski A, Kurth C, Holden-Wiltse J & Saari J (1992) Food preferences in human obesity: carbohydrates versus fats Appetite 18 207–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Golay A & Bobbioni E (1997) The role of dietary fat in obesity Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 21(Suppl 3) S2–S11

    Google Scholar 

  • Green PR, Bowden DJ, Kestin M & Feng Z (1993) Influences on food selection of women on high- and low-fat diets J. Appl. Biobehav. Res. 1 174–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill AJ, Rogers PJ & Blundell JE (1995) Techniques for the experimental measurement of human eating behaviour and food intake: a practical guide Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 19 361–375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JO & Prentice AM (1995) Sugar and body weight regulation Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 52(Suppl) 264S–274S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lissner L & Heitmann BL (1995) Dietary fat and obesity: evidence from epidemiology Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 49 79–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macdiarmid JI, Hamilton KV & Blundell JE (1995) Leeds High Fat Study: comparison of food choice and dietary patterns in high and low fat consumers Appetite 24 29 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Margetts BM, Cade JE & Osmond C (1989) Comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a diet record Int. J. Epidemiol. 18 868–873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mattes RD (1993) Fat preference and adherence to a reduced-fat diet Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 57 373–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mela DJ & Sacchetti DA (1991) Sensory preference for fats: relationship with diet and body composition Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 53 908–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick ZS & Schiffman SS (1992) Role of dietary fat in calorie intake and weight gain Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 16 585–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Cooling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooling, J., Blundell, J. High-fat and low-fat phenotypes: habitual eating of high- and low-fat foods not related to taste preference for fat. Eur J Clin Nutr 55, 1016–1021 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601262

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601262

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links