Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

Underestimation of percentage fat mass measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry method in obese children

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate whether there is a difference between body fat mass percentage measured by BIA and DXA method.

Design: Transversal study, randomized.

Setting: Lipid and Obesity Outpatient Clinic, Department of Pediatrics, University of Vienna, Austria.

Subjects: Twenty-seven children and adolescents from the Lipid and Obesity Outpatient Clinic, Department of Pediatrics, University of Vienna, were included in the study (14 boys and 13 girls between 6 and 18 y; mean age 12.6 and 13.1 y).

Methods: The body fat percentage was measured with BIA (bioelectrical impedance analyzer BIA 2000-M) and DXA (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) methods on the same day.

Results: The mean difference between the body fat mass percentage measured by BIA and DXA was 4.48 with a standard deviation of 2.93. The results measured by BIA were almost always lower than that by DXA by about 12%. The lower and upper limit of the difference in 95% confidence interval was −5.64 and −3.32. By paired t-test, these results were significantly different (P<0.001). The correlation between the two measurements was 0.826. The mean percentage of body fat mass measured by BIA was 34.86±7.08% and by DXA 39.75±5.63%. The differences were not changed by age and body fat percentage but they were by sex.

Conclusions: The results of the study show that the body fat percentages measured by BIA and DXA method were significantly different. This is very important because BIA technique is a routine technique for clinical purposes. Adjustments to the formula used for calculating the total fat mass in obese children and adolescence are necessary. Underestimation of body fat percentage measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis compared to dual X-ray absorptiometry method in obese children is three times higher with boys than with girls.

Sponsorship: Data Input GmbH, Hofheim, Germany.

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2001) 55, 423–429

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bland JM & Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet i 307–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Data Input GmbH (1998) BIA-Kompendium. Biophysikalische Grundlagen, Körperzusammensetzung, Ernährungszustand, Klinische Anwendungsbereiche, Fallbeispiele Hofheim, Germany

  • Deurenberg P (1996) Limitations of the bioelectrical impedance method for the assessment of body fat in severe obesity Am. J. Clin. Nutr 64(Suppl) 449S–452S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dezenberg CV, Nagy TR, Gower BA, Johnson R Goran MI (1999) Predicting body composition from anthropometry in pre-adolescent children Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord 23 253–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis KJ (1996) Measuring body fatness in children and young adults: comparison of bioelectric impedance analysis, total body electrical conductivity, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord 20 866–873

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer H & Lembcke B (1991) Die Anwendung der Bioelektrischen Impedananalyse (BIA) zur Beurteilung der Körperzusammensetzung und des Ernährungszustandes Innere Medizin Aktuell 18(1/1991) S13–S17

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusch C et al (1999) Neonatal body composition: dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, magnetic resonance imaging, and three-dimensional chemical shift imaging versus chemical analysis in piglets Pediatr. Res 46 465–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heber D, Ingles S, Ashley JM, Maxwell MH, Lyons RF & Elashoff RM (1996) Clinical detection of sarcopenic obesity by bioelectrical impedance analysis Am. J. Clin. Nutr 64 472S–477S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kushner RF & Schoeller DA (1986) Estimation of total body water by bioelectrical impedance analysis Am. J. Clin. Nutr 44 417–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenhagen DK, Borel MJ, Welch DC, Piasecki JH, Chen KY & Flakoll PJ (1999) A comparison of air displacement plethysmography with three other techniques to determine body fat in healthy adults J. Parent. Enteral. Nutr 23 293–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewy VD, Danadian K & Arslanian S (1999) Determination of body composition in African-American children: validation of bioelectrical impedance with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab 12 443–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lukaski HC (1987) Methods for the assessment of human body composition: traditional and new Am. J. Clin. Nutr 46 537–556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okasora K, Takaya R, Tokuda M, Fukunaga Y, Oguni T, Tanaka H, Konishi K & Tamani H (1999) Comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of body composition in children Pediatr. Int 41 121–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrobelli A, Wang ZM & Heymsfied SB (1998) Techniques used in measuring human body composition Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 1 439–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez G, Moreno LA, Sarria A, Fleta J & Bueno M (1999) Diurnal variation in the assessment of body composition using bioelectrical impedance in children Eur. J. Clin. Nutr 53 24 4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeller DA (1989) Changes in total-body water with age Am. J. Clin. Nutr 50 117 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal KR, Burastero S, Chun A, Coronel P, Pierson RN & Wang J (1991) Estimation of extracellular and total body water by multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance measurement Am. J. Clin. Nutr 54 26–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wattanapenpaiboon N, Lukito W, Strauss BJG, Hsu-Hage BH-H, Wahlqvist ML & Stroud DP (1998) Agreement of skinfold measurement and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) methods with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in estimating total body fat in Anglo-Celtic Australians Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord 22 854–860

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K Widhalm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eisenkölbl, J., Kartasurya, M. & Widhalm, K. Underestimation of percentage fat mass measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry method in obese children. Eur J Clin Nutr 55, 423–429 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601184

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601184

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links