The Nature of Time

Abstract

I CANNOT accept Prof. Campbell's criticism, which seems to me to be inconsistent. Apparently he holds that the time of an event is, by definition,a dial reading (“Fundamentally its nature is that of a dial reading”: “the scale readings are the times”). He agrees, however, that “the time distortion cannot be exhibited experimentally”. Hence there is no evidence for a change of dial reading (that is, of that which by definition is the time). What, then, is this “time distortion” which he accepts?

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DINGLE, H. The Nature of Time. Nature 145, 427–428 (1940). https://doi.org/10.1038/145427a0

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.